Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:41:15.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental Use of Clovis Weaponry and Tools on African Elephants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

George C. Frison
George C. Frison*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Clovis projectile points and chipped-stone tools have been recovered in a number of archaeological sites in the New World, but these cannot be tested on mammoths, which we know from the archaeological evidence Clovis hunters were able to procure. Extensive culling of elephants in Hwange National Park in Zimbabwe provided the necessary animals to test replicas of Clovis tools and weaponry. The experiments leave little doubt that Clovis projectile points can inflict lethal wounds on African elephants and that simple stone tools will perform the necessary butchering tasks. The physiology of mammoths and elephants is similar enough to make positive statements on the potential of this kind of stone-tool and weaponry assemblage, but we will never be able to compare elephant and mammoth behavior directly.

Résumé

Résumé

Las puntas de proyectiles tipo Clovis y las herramientas de piedra lascada han sido recobrado de varios sitios arqueológicos en el Nuevo Mundo, pero no es posible probar estas en los mamutes qué sabemós, de los datos arqueológicos, qué los cazadores Clovis podrían obtener. Entresacadura extensiva de los elefantes del Parque Nacional Hwange en Zimbabwe proporcionaba lo necessario de los animales para probar unas replicas de armas y herramientas tipo Clovis. Las pruebas no dejan duda que los proyectiles Clovis podrían hacer y dar heridas mortales a los elefantes africanos, y qué las herramientas liticas sencillas realizarán las tareas necesarias de la carnicería. La fisiología de los mamutes y de los elefantes es sufkiente parecida para ofrecer unas declaraciónes positivas sobre las funciones potenciales de este clase de conjunto de armas y herramientas liticas, pero nunca podríamos comprobar positivamente las maneras de los elefantes y de los mamutes.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , October 1989 , pp. 766 - 784
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1989

References

References Cited

Bradley, B. A. 1974 Comments on the Lithic Technology of the Casper Site Materials. In The Casper Site : A Hell Gap Bison Kill on the High Plains, edited by Frison, G. C., pp. 191–197. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Bradley, B. A. 1982 Lithic Technology. In The Agate Basin Site : A Record of the Paleoindian Occupation of the Northwestern High Plains, edited by Frison, G. C. and Stanford, D. J., pp. 181–208. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Bradley, B. A., and Stanford, D. J. 1987 The Claypool Study. In The Horner Site : The Type Site of the Cody Cultural Complex, edited by Frison, G. C. and Todd, L. C., pp. 405–434. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Figgins, J. D. 1933 A Further Contribution to the Antiquity of Man in America. Proceedings of the Colorado Museum of Natural History 12(2) : 4–8. Denver.Google Scholar
Frison, G. C. 1965 Spring Creek Cave, Wyoming. American Antiquity 31 : 81–94.Google Scholar
Frison, G. C. 1968 Daugherty Cave, Wyoming. Plains Anthropologist 13 : 253–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frison, G. C. 1978 Prehistoric Hunters of the High Plains. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Frison, G. C. 1982 The Sheaman Site : A Clovis Component. In The Agate Basin Site : A Record of the Paleoindian Occupation of the Northwestern High Plains, edited by Frison, G. C. and Stanford, D. J., pp. 143–157. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Frison, G. C, and Todd, L. C. 1986 The Colby Mammoth Site : Taphonomy and Archaeology of a Clovis Kill in Northern Wyoming. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Frison, G. C, and Stanford, D. J. 1982 The Agate Basin Site : A Record of the Paleoindian Occupation of the Northwestern High Plains. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Haury, E. W. 1953 Artifacts with Mammoth Remains, Naco, Arizona : 1. Discovery of the Naco Mammoth and Associated Projectile Points. American Antiquity 19 : 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haury, E. W., Sayles, E. B., and Wasley, W. H. 1959 The Lehner Mammoth Site, Southeastern Arizona. American Antiquity 25 : 2–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, C. V. 1982 Were Clovis Progenitors in Beringia? In Paleoecology of Beringia, edited by Hopkins, D. M., Matthews, J. V. Jr., Schweger, C. E., and Young, S. B., pp. 383–398. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herz, O. F. 1902 Frozen Mammoth in Siberia. Bulletin of Imperial Academy, St. Petersburg, Fifth series, Vol. 16, No. 4.Google Scholar
Hester, J. J. 1972 Blackwater Locality No. 1 : A Stratified Early Man Site in Eastern New Mexico. Publications of the Fort Burgwin Research Center No. 8, Taos, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Lahren, L. A., and Bonnichsen, R. 1974 Bone Foreshafts from a Clovis Burial in Southwestern Montana. Science 186 : 147–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonhardy, F. C. (editor) 1966 Domebo : A Paleo-Indian Mammoth Kill in the Prairie-Plains. Contribution No. 1. Museum of the Great Plains, Lawton, Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Stanford, D. J. 1979 Bison Kill by Ice Age Hunters. National Geographic 155 : 114–119.Google Scholar
Weaver, K. F. 1985 The Search for Our Ancestors. National Geographic 168 : 560–623.Google Scholar