Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:33:29.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Making Sense of Flake Scatters: Lithic Technological Strategies and Mobility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Frank L. Cowan*
Affiliation:
Cincinnati Museum Center, Museum of Natural History and Science, Geier Collections and Research Center, 1720 Gilbert Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45202

Abstract

Recent theoretical developments in the organization of lithic technology provide powerful tools for learning about prehistoric settlement systems and the roles of sites within settlement systems. Strong relationships between mobility and the designs and production methods of stone tools provide a means for testing hypotheses about the functional and organizational roles of sites; this is especially important for learning about "plow zone lithic scatters" and other small, poorly preserved sites. Subsistence-settlement models for three periods of western New York prehistory imply different roles for small sites in the interior of the region. These hypotheses are tested by the analysis of dominant tool-production methods. Strong differences in stone tool assemblages indicate major differences in site roles, but greater analytical detail and discriminatory power are obtained from the analysis of tool-production methods from flakes.

Résumé

Résumé

Recientes desarollos teóricos en la organización de la tecnología lítica se presentan como instrumentos poderosos para el aprendizaje de los sistemas de asentimenta prehistóricos y del papel que los sitios representan sitios dentro de dichos sistemas. Las fuertes relaciones entre la mobilidad y los diseños y métodos de productión de las herramientas de piedra proveen una manera de probar las hipótesis sobre el papel funcional y la organización de sitios; esto es especialmente importante para comprender las dispersiones líticas en las zonas de arado y también para aprender de otros sitios que son más chicos en pobre estado de preservación. Modelos de la relación entre el asentamiento y la alimentación para tres períodos de la prehistoria occidental de New York implican diferentes papeles para los sitios pequeños del interior de la región. Estas hipótesis son puesta a prueba por el análisis de los métodos dominantes de la producción de herramientas. Fuertes diferencias en el conjunto de herramientas de piedra indicán grandes diferencias en las funciones de los sitios, pew el énfasis en las lascas como la base del análisis de producción proporciona mayores detalles analiticos y potencia discriminatoria.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Ahler, S. A. 1971 Projectile Point Form and Function at Rodgers Shelter, Missouri. Research Series 8. Missouri Archaeological Society, Columbia.Google Scholar
Allen, K. S. 1988 Ceramic Style and Social Continuity in an Iroquoian Tribe. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Anthropology, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Amick, D. S., and Mauldin, R. P. (editors) 1989 Experiments in Lithic Technology. BAR International Series 528. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, L. R. 1979 Organization and Formation Processes: Looking at Curated Technologies. Journal of Anthropological Research 35: 255273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, L. R. 1980 Willow Smoke and Dog's Tails: Hunter-Gatherer Settlement Systems and Archaeological Site Formation. American Antiquity 45: 420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callender, C. 1978 Fox. laNortheast, edited by Trigger, B. G., pp. 622647. Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 15, Sturtevant, W. G., general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Callender, C. 1983 Archaic Mortuary Sites in the Central Mississippi Drainage: Distribution, Structure, and Behavioral Implications. In Archaic Hunters and Gatherers in the American Midwest, edited by Phillips, J. L. and Brown, J.A. pp. 117145. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Cleland, C. E. 1982 The Inland Shore Fishery of the Northern Great Lakes: Its Development and Importance in Prehistory. American Antiquity 47: 761784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, F. L. 1994 Prehistoric Mobility Strategies in Western New York: A Small Sites Perspective. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Anthropology, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Cowan, F. L., and Fletcher, T. 1991 Chert Quarries on the Niagara Frontier: An Iroquoian Example. Paper presented at the 31st Annual Meeting of the Northeastern Anthropological Association, Waterloo, Ontario.Google Scholar
Cowan, F. L., and Fletcher, T. 1978 Algonquin. In Northeast, edited by Trigger, B. G., pp. 792797. Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 15, Sturtevant, W. G., general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Cowan, F. L., and Fletcher, T. 1990 The Archaic. In The Archaeology of Southern Ontario toA.D. 1650, edited by Ellis, C. J. and Ferris, N., pp. 65124. Occasional Publication 5. Ontario Archaeological Society, London, Ontario.Google Scholar
Engelbrecht, W E. 1972 The Reflection of Patterned Behavior in Iroquois Pottery Decoration. Pennsylvania Archaeologist 42: 115.Google Scholar
Engelbrecht, W E. 1974 The Iroquois: Archaeological Patterning on the Tribal Level. World Archaeology 6: 5265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelbrecht, W E. 1978 Ceramic Patterning Between New York Iroquois Sites. In The Spatial Organization of Culture, edited by Hodder, I., pp. 141152. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Engelbrecht, W E. 1984 The Kleis Site Ceramics: An Interpretative Approach. In Extending the Rafters: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Iroquoian Studies, edited by Foster, M., Campisi, J., and Mithun, M., pp. 325339. State University of New York Press, Albany.Google Scholar
Engelbrecht, W E. 1978 Northern Iroquoian Culture Patterns. In Northeast, edited by Trigger, B. G., pp. 296321. Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 15, edited by Sturtevant, W. C.. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Gehring, C. T, and Starna, W. A. (eds.) 1988 A Journey into Mohawk and Oneida Country, 1634-1635: The Journal of Barmen Meyndertsz van den Bogaert. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, New York.Google Scholar
Goldstein, L. G. 1980 Mississippian Mortuary Practices: A Case Study of Two Cemeteries in the Lower Illinois Valley. Archeological Program, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.Google Scholar
Granger, J. E. 1978a Cache Blades, Chert and Communication: A Reappraisal of Certain Aspects of Meadowood Phase and the Concept of a Burial Cult in the Northeast. In Essays in Northeastern Anthropology in Memory of Marian E. White, edited by Engelbrecht, W. E. and Grayson, D.K. pp. 96122. Occasional Papers in Northeastern Anthropology 5. Franklin Pierce College, Rindge, New Hampshire.Google Scholar
Granger, J. E. 1978b Meadowood Settlement Pattern in the Niagara Frontier Region of Western New York. Anthropological Papers 65. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger, J. E. 1981 The Seward Site Cache and a Study of the Meadowood Phase “Cache Blade” in the Northeast. Archaeology of Eastern North America 9: 63103.Google Scholar
Hair, J. K, Jr., Anderson, R. E., and Tatham, R. L. 1987 Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. 2nd ed. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Hunt, E. D. 1990a Canadaway Creek Anthropology Project: Excavations at the Mallory Site. Bulletin of the New York State Archaeological Association 100: 517.Google Scholar
Hunt, E. D. 1990b A Consideration of Environmental, Physiographic and Horticultural Systems as They Impact Late Woodland Settlement Patterns in Western New York: A Geographic Information System (GIS) Analysis of Site Location. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, State University of New York, Buffalo.Google Scholar
Keeley, L. H. 1982 Hafting and Retooling: Effects on the Archaeological Record. American Antiquity 47: 798809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, R. L. 1988 The Three Sides of a Biface. American Antiquity 53: 717734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, S. L. 1994 A Formal Approach to the Design and Assembly of Mobile Toolkits. American Antiquity 59: 426442. Minitab, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, S. L. 1989 Minitab Data Analysis Software, Release 7.2. Minitab, Inc. State College, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Morrow, T. A. 1997 A Chip off the Old Block: Alternative Approaches to Debitage Analysis. Lithic Technology 22: 5169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, M. C. 1991 The Study of Technological Organization. In Archaeological Method and Theory. 3, edited by Schiffer, M. B., pp. 57100. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Odell, G. H. 1981 The Morphological Express at Function Junction: Searching for Meaning in Lithic Tool Types. Journal of Anthropological Research 37: 319342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odell, G. H. 1988 Addressing Prehistoric Hunting Practices through Stone Tool Analysis. American Anthropologist 90: 335356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odell, G. H. 1989 Fitting Analytical Techniques to Prehistoric Problems with Lithic Data. In Alternative Approaches to Lithic Analysis, edited by Henry, D. O. and Odell, G.H. pp. 159182. Archeological Papers 1. American Anthropological Association, Arlington, Virginia.Google Scholar
Odell, G. H. 1996 Stone Tools and Mobility in the Illinois Valley: From Hunter-Gatherer Camps to Agricultural Villages. Archaeological Series 10. International Monographs in Prehistory, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Odell, G. H. 1998 Investigating Correlates of Sedentism and Domestication in Prehistoric North America. American Antiquity 63: 553571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odell, G. H., and Cowan, F. L. 1986 Experiments with Spears and Arrows on Animal Targets. Journal of Field Archaeology 13: 195212.Google Scholar
Parry, W., and Kelly, R. 1987 Expedient Core Technology and Sedentism. In The Organization of Core Technology, edited by Johnson, J. K. and Morrow, C.A. pp. 285304. Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
Perrelli, D. J., Cowan, F. L., and Rayner-Herter, N. 1993 Stage 3 Cultural Resources Investigations of the Brompton 2 Site (UB 2412), Town of Amherst, Erie County, New York. Reports of the Archaeological Survey 25(9). Department of Anthropology, State University of New York, Buffalo.Google Scholar
Prisch, B. C. 1976 The Divers Lake Quarry Site, Genesee County, New York. Bulletin of the New York State Archaeological Association 66: 818.Google Scholar
Ritchie, W. A. 1969 The Archaeology of New York State. Rev. 2nd ed. Natural History Press, Garden City, New York.Google Scholar
Ritchie, W. A., and Funk, R. E. 1973 Aboriginal Settlement Patterns in the Northeast. Memoir 20. New York State Museum, Albany.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. S., and Rogers, J. H. 1959 The Yearly Cycle of the Mistassini Indians. Arctic 12(3): 131138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rue, L. L., II 1978 The Deer of North America. Outdoor Life Books, Crown, New York.Google Scholar
Schock, J. M. 1974 The Chautauqua Phase and Other Late Woodland Sites in Southwestern New York. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, State University of New York, Buffalo.Google Scholar
Short, M. J. 1986 Technological Organization and Settlement Mobility: An Ethnographic Examination. Journal of Anthropological Research 41: 1551.Google Scholar
Short, M. J. 1994 Size and Form in the Analysis of Flake Debris: Review and Recent Approaches. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1: 69110.Google Scholar
Snow, D. R. 1978 Eastern Abenaki. In Northeast, edited by Trigger, B. G., pp. 137147. Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 15, W. G. Sturtevant, general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Sollberger, J. D. 1971 A Technological Study of Beveled Knives. Plains Anthropologist 16: 209218.Google Scholar
Spence, M. W., Pihl, R.H., and Murphy, C.R. 1990 Cultural Complexes of the Early and Middle Woodland Periods. In The Archaeology of Southern Ontario to A.D. 1650, edited by Ellis, C.J. and Ferris, N., pp. 125169. Occasional Publication 5. Ontario Archaeological Society, London, Ontario Google Scholar
Talbot, F. X. 1949 Saint among the Hurons, The Life of Jean de Brebeuf. Harper, New York.Google Scholar
Trigger, B. G. 1978 Cultural Unity and Diversity. In Northeast, edited by Trigger, B. G., pp. 798804. Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 15, Sturtevant, W. G., general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Trigger, B. G. 1990 The Huron: Farmers of the North. 2nd ed. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, Fort Worth.Google Scholar
White, M. E. 1961 Iroquois Culture History in the Niagara Frontier Area of New York State. Anthropological Papers 16. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. E. 1963 Settlement Pattern Change and the Development of Horticulture in the New York-Ontario Area. Pennsylvania Archaeologist 33(1-2): 112.Google Scholar
Wray, C. F. 1948 Varieties and Sources of Flint Found in New York State. Pennsylvania Archaeologist 18(1-2): 2545.Google Scholar
Wray, C. F. 1973 Manualfor Seneca Iroquois Archeology. Cultures Primitive. Rochester, New York.Google Scholar
Wray, C. F, Sempowski, M. L., Saunders, L. P., and Cervone, G. C. 1987 The Adams and Culbertson Sites. Charles F. Wray Series in Seneca Archaeology 1, Research Records 19. Rochester Museum and Science Center, Rochester, New York.Google Scholar