Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:36:44.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Middle Woodland Culture History in the Great Lakes Riverine Area*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Stuart Struever
Stuart Struever*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There are multiple structural and stylistic differences between local Middle Woodland expressions in the Great Lakes-Riverine area. These reflect not only different cultural systems but also in some cases different levels of cultural complexity. At present these manifestations are grouped into a single Hopewellian culture on the basis of selected artifact commonalities. Variations within Great Lakes-Riverine Middle Woodland are of several kinds: (1) complexes that include diagnostic Hopewellian culture artifacts are concentrated in the major river valleys, while apparently contemporary manifestations in neighboring localities lack Hopewellian forms; (2) if we employ artifact classes other than those used as Hopewellian diagnostics, Middle Woodland regional traditions can be defined that have distributions sharply different from those of specifically Hopewellian complexes; (3) comparison of Hopewellian manifestations in Ohio, Illinois, and elsewhere indicates that these are not local expressions of a homogeneous culture but probably representatives of more than one cultural system; and (4) structural analysis of Middle Woodland mortuary and subsistence-settlement patterns in two regions, Illinois and Ohio, indicates contrasting cultural systems. It is argued that if ceramics of the Havana tradition are classified according to criteria developed in the central Illinois Valley, then potentially significant local style variations will go unrecognized. Tentative definition of four microstyle zones within the Havana tradition illustrates the utility of a system of analysis geared to recognition of small-scale style differences.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 31 , Issue 2Part1 , October 1965 , pp. 211 - 223
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was presented at the annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 1964.

References

References Cited

Bennett, John W. 1952 The Prehistory of the Northern Mississippi Valley. In Archeology of Eastern United States, edited by James B. Griffin, pp. 108–23. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1962 Archaeology as Anthropology. American Antiquity, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 217–25. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Brown, James A. 1964 The Northeastern Extension of the Havana Tradition. In Hopewellian Studies, edited by Joseph R. Caldwell and Robert L. Hall (in press). Illinois State Museum, Springfield.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Joseph R. 1958 Trend and Tradition in the Prehistory of the Eastern United States. Memoirs of the American Anthropological Association, No. 88. Menasha.Google Scholar
Crane, H. R. and Griffin, James B. 1962 University of Michigan Radiocarbon Dates VII. Radiocarbon, Vol. 4, pp. 183–203. New Haven.Google Scholar
Gillihan, James E. and Beeson, William J. 1960 The Gamble Site. In Indian Mounds and Villages in Illinois, edited by Elaine A. Bluhm, pp. 31–70, Bulletin of the Illinois Archaeological Survey, No. 2. Urbana.Google Scholar
Griffin, James B. 1952 Culture Periods in Eastern United States Archeology. In Archeology of Eastern United States, edited by James 6. Griffin, pp. 352–64. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Mills, William C. 1907 Explorations of the Edwin Harness Mound. Ohio Archaeological and Historical Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 113–93. Columbus.Google Scholar
Mills, William C. 1916 Exploration of the Tremper Mound. Ohio Archaeological and Historical Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 262–398. Columbus.Google Scholar
Moorehead, Warren K. 1922 The Hopewell Mound Group of Ohio. Field Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Series, Vol. 6, No. 5. Chicago.Google Scholar
Morse, Dan F. 1963 The Steuben Village and Mounds: A Multicomponent Late Hopewell Site in Illinois. Anthropological Papers, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, No. 21. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Prufer, Olaf H. 1965 The McGraw Site: A Study in Hopewellian Dynamics. Cleveland Museum of Natural History, Scientific Papers, Vol. 3, No. 1. Cleveland.Google Scholar
Quimby, George I. 1941 The Goodall Focus. Prehistory Research Series, Vol. 2, No. 2. Indiana Historical Society, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Quimby, George I. 1952 The Archeology of the Upper Great Lakes Area. In Archeology of Eastern United States, edited by James B. Griffin, pp. 99–107. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall D. 1958 Social Stratification in Polynesia. University of Washington Press, Seattle.Google Scholar
Service, Elman R. 1962 Primitive Social Organization. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
Shetrone, H. C. 1926 Explorations of the Hopewell Group of Prehistoric Earthworks. Ohio Archaeological and Historical Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 1. Columbus.Google Scholar
Squier, Ephraim G. and Davis, Edwin H. 1848 Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, Vol. 1. Washington.Google Scholar
Struever, Stuart 1960 The Kamp Mound Group and a Hopewell Mortuary Complex in the Lower Illinois Valley. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Northwestern University, Evanston.Google Scholar
Struever, Stuart 1964 The Hopewell Interaction Sphere in Riverine-Western Great Lakes Culture History. In Hopewellian Studies, edited by Joseph R. Caldwell and Robert L. Hall. Illinois State Museum, Scientific Papers, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 85–106. Springfield.Google Scholar
Webb, William S. and Snow, Charles E. 1945 The Adena People. University of Kentucky, Reports in Anthropology and Archaeology, Vol. 6. Lexington.Google Scholar
Willey, Gordon R. 1956 Problems Concerning Prehistoric Settlement Patterns in the Maya Lowlands. In Prehistoric Settlement Patterns in the New World, edited by Gordon R. Willey, pp. 107–14. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, No. 23. New York.Google Scholar
Willey, Gordon R. and Phillips, Philip 1958 Method and Theory in American Archaeology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Winters, Howard D. 1963 An Archaeological Survey of the Wabash Valley in Illinois. Illinois State Museum, Reports of Investigations, No. 10. Springfield.Google Scholar