Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:10:57.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Middle-Range Theory in Archaeology: A Critical Review of Origins and Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

L. Mark Raab  and
Albert C. Goodyear
L. Mark Raab
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, California StateUniversity at Northridge, Northridge, CA 91324
Albert C. Goodyear
Affiliation:
Institute of Archeology and Anthropology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The concept of middle-range theory, arising over three decades ago in sociology, is reviewed. The concept was proposed as an approach to theorizing, urging consolidation of high-order theories with low-order empirical studies. The critical elements in such hierarchies are theories of a middle-range of abstraction. However, most current conceptions of “middle-range theory” in archaeology are far more narrowly conceived. Derived primarily from Binford's work, they continue the New Archaeology's attempt to develop a materialist epistemology for archaeology. In this view, principles of site formation processes are nearly synonymous with “middle-range theory.” The dangers to theory-building of this approach are outlined. Examples of middle-range theory that expand our capacity for explanation of cultural behavior are presented.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , April 1984 , pp. 255 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Baker, Charles M. 1978 The Size Effect: An Explanation of Variability in Surface Artifact Assemblage Content. American Antiquity 43: 288–293.Google Scholar
Beer, Stafford 1967 Cybernetics and Management. The English Universities Press, London.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1968a Archaeological Perspectives. In New Perspectives in Archaeology, edited by Binford, S. R. and Binford, L.R., pp. 5–33. Aldine Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1968b. Some Comments on Historical Versus Processual Archaeology. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 24: 267–275.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1977a Introduction. In For Theory Building in Archaeology, edited by R. Binford, Lewis, pp. 1–10. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1977b. Forty-seven Trips. In Stone Tools as Cultural Markers, edited by Wright, R. V. S., pp. 24–36. Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies. Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1978 Nunamiut Ethnoarchaeology. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1979 Organization and Formation Processes: Looking at Curated Technologies. Journal of Anthropological Research 35(3): 255–273.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1980 Willow Smoke and Dogs’ Tails: Hunter-Gatherer Settlement Systems and Archaeological Site Formation. American Antiquity 45: 4–20.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1981a Bones: Ancient Men, and Modern Myths. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1981b Behavioral Archaeology and the “Pompeii Premise.” Journal of Anthropological Research 37: 195–208.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R., and Bertram, Jack B. 1977 Bone Frequencies—and Attritional Processes. In For Theory Building in Archaeology, edited by Binford, L. R., pp. 77–156. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Binford, Sally R., and Binford, Lewis R. 1968 Archaeological Theory and Method. In New Perspectives in Archaeology, edited by Binford, S. R and Binford, L. R., pp. 1–3. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Joseph R. (editor) 1966 New Roads to Yesterday: Essays in Archaeology. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. L. 1973 Archaeology: The Loss of Innocence. Antiquity 47: 6–18.Google Scholar
Coser, Lewis A. 1975 Commentaries on Merton's Work. In The Idea of Social Structure, Papers in Honor of Robert K. Merton, edited by A. Coser, Lewis, pp. 516–522. Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, New York.Google Scholar
Dubin, R. 1959 Stability of Human Organizations. In Modern Organization Theory, edited by Hains, M., pp. 218–248. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Flannery, Kent V. 1972 The Cultural Evolution of Civilizations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 3: 399–426.Google Scholar
Freese, Lee 1980a The Problem of Cumulative Knowledge. In Theoretical Methods in Sociology, edited by Freese, Lee, pp. 13–69. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Freese, Lee 1980b Formal Theorizing. Annual Review of Sociology 6: 187–212.Google Scholar
Fritz, John M. 1968 Archaeological Epistemology: Two Views. Unpublished Master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Fritz, John M. 1972 Archaeological Systems for Indirect Observation of the Past. In Contemporary Archaeology, edited by P. Leone, Mark, pp. 135–157. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Fritz, John M., and Plog, Fred T. 1970 The Nature of Archaeological Reasoning. American Antiquity 35: 405–412.Google Scholar
Glaser, Barney G., and Strauss, Anselm L. 1967 The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Goodyear, Albert C. 1977 Review of Behavioral Archaeology, by Schiffer, Michael B.. American Antiquity 42: 668–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodyear, Albert C., Mark Raab, L., and Klinger, Timothy C. 1978 The Status of Archaeological Research Design in Cultural Resource Management. American Antiquity 43: 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. 1965 Aspects of Scientific Explanation. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hill, James N. 1972 The Methodological Debate in Contemporary Archaeology: A Model. In Models in Archaeology, edited by L. Clark, David, pp. 61–107. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Johnson, Gregory 1982 Organizational Structure and Scalar Stress. In Theory and Explanation in Archaeology, The Southampton Conference, edited by Colin, Renfrew, Rowlands, Michael J., and Barbara Abbott, Segraves-Whallon, pp. 389–421. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Kluckhohn, Clyde 1940 The Conceptual Structure in Middle American Studies. In The Maya and Their Neighbors, edited by Hay, C. L. et al., pp. 41–51. Appleton-Century, New York.Google Scholar
Larson, Calvin J. 1973 Major Themes in Sociological Theory. David McKay, New York.Google Scholar
Mac White, Eoin 1956 On the Interpretation of Archaeological Evidence in Historical and Sociological Terms. American Anthropologist 58: 3–25.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1948 Discussion of Parsons. American Sociological Review 13: 164–168.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1949 Social Theory and Social Structure. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1967 On Theoretical Sociology. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1968 Social Theory and Social Structure (3rd ed.). Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Morse, Dan F. 1977 Dalton Settlement Systems: Reply to Schif Fer (2). Plains Anthropologist 22: 149–158.Google Scholar
Mullins, N. C. 1973 Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott 1948 The Position of Sociological Theory. American Sociological Review 13: 156–164.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott 1950 The Prospects of Sociological Theory. American Sociological Review 16: 3–16.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott 1951 Toward a General Theory of Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Peebles, Christopher S., and Kus, Susan M. 1977 Some Archaeological Correlates of Ranked Societies. American Antiquity 42: 421–448.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl R. 1959 The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Price, Barbara J. 1982 Cultural Materialism: A Theoretical Review. American Antiquity 47: 709–741.Google Scholar
Raab, L. Mark, and C. Goodyear, Albert 1973 On the Value of Middle Range Theory in Archaeological Research Strategies. Ms. in the possession of the authors.Google Scholar
Reid, J. Jefferson, B. Schiffer, Michael, and L. Rathje, William 1975 Behavioral Archaeology: Four Strategies. American Anthropologist 77: 864–869.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B. 1972 Archaeological Context and Systemic Context. American Antiquity 37: 156–165.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B. 1976 Behavioral Archaeology. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B. 1977 Toward a Unified Science of the Cultural Past. In Research Strategies in Historical Archaeology, edited by South, Stanley, pp. 13–40. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B. 1980 Review of For Theory Building in Archaeology: Essays on Faunal Remains, Aquatic Resources, Spatial Analysis, and Systemic Modeling , edited by R. Binford, Lewis. American Antiquity 45: 377.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B. 1983 Toward the Identification of Formation Processes. American Antiquity 48: 675–706.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B., and Rathje, William L. 1973 Efficient Exploitation of the Archaeological Record: Penetrating Problems. In Research and Theory in Current Archaeology, edited by L. Redman, Charles, pp. 169–179. Wiley Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
Shannon, Claude E., and Weaver, Warren 1949 The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Allan P. 1978 Inference and Evidence in Archaeology: A Discussion of the Conceptual Problems. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. I, edited by B. Schiffer, Michael, pp. 183–222. Academic Press, N. Y.Google Scholar
Taylor, Walter W. Jr. 1948 A Study of Archaeology, AAA Memoir No. 69, American Anthropological Association, Menasha.Google Scholar
Thomas, David H. 1979 Archaeology. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
Watson, Patty Jo, LeBlanc, Steven A., and Redman, Charles R. 1971 Explanation in Archeology: An Explicitly Scientific Approach. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Watson, Richard A. 1976 Inference in Archaeology. American Antiquity 41: 58–66.Google Scholar
Wiener, Norbert 1967 The Human Use of Human Beings. Avon, New York.Google Scholar
Wiessner, Polly 1982 Beyond Willow Smoke and Dogs’ Tails: A Comment on Binford's Analysis of Hunter-Gatherer Settlement Systems. American Antiquity 47: 171–178.Google Scholar
Willey, Gordon R., and Sabloff, Jeremy A. 1980 A History of American Archaeology (2nd ed.). W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Wood, W. Raymond, and L. Johnson, Donald 1978 A Survey of Disturbance Processes in Archaeological Site Formation. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. I, edited by B. Schiffer, Michael, pp. 315–381. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Wright, Henry T., and Johnson, Gregory A. 1975 Population, Exchange and Early State Formation in Southwestern Iran. American Anthropologist 77: 267–289.Google Scholar