Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:20:26.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mississippian Chiefdoms and the Fission-Fusion Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

John H. Blitz*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Queens College, The City University of New York, 65-30 Kissena Boulevard, Flushing, NY 11367

Abstract

In the American Southeast, the simple-complex chiefdom cycle is the predominant model of sociopolítical development applied to the Precolumbian ranked societies known as Mississippian. In this paper, mound-center settlement patterns in the South Appalachian area are reviewed. Most of these distributions fail to conform to the hierarchy of centers predicted by the simple-complex chiefdom model. Contrary to the model, an absence of primary-secondary center hierarchies implies that extension of regional administrative control was not the primary determinant of mound-center distributions. A review of ethnohistorical sources suggests that another sociopolitical mechanism, the fission-fusion process, created the majority of mound-center settlement patterns through the aggregation or dispersal of basic political units. The fission-fusion process was the product of efforts by factional leaders to resolve the conflicting values of autonomy and security. Unlike the simple-complex chiefdom dichotomy, the fission-fusion model encompasses a greater diversity of Mississippian political forms and provides an alternative explanation for changes in mound center size, complexity, and location.

Résumé

Résumé

El modelo predominate para el desarrollo sociopolítico aplicado en el sureste Norteamericano a las sociedades jerárquicas precolombinas misisipianas es el cacicazgo simple-complejo. En este trabajo he analizado los patrones de asentamiento de centros con montículos al sur de los Apalaches. La mayoría de estas distribuciones no se alinean con una jerarquía de centros, como lo predeciría el modelo de cacicazgo simple-complejo. La ausencia de centros jerarquizados primario-secundarios implicaría que la extensión del control administrativo regional no era el principal determinante de estos centros con montículos. Un análisis de fuentes etnohistóricas sugiere que otro mecanismo sociopolítico, elproceso de fusión-rompimiento, creó la mayoría de estos patrones de asentamiento de centros con montículos a través de la acumulación o dispersion de pequehas unidades politícas. El proceso de fusión-rompimiento fue el producto del esfuerzo de líderes de facciones para resolver los conflictos resultantes de los intereses sociales conflictivos de autonomía y seguridad. A diferencia de la dicotomía de cacicazgos simple-complejo, el modelo de fusión-rompimiento incorpora una mayor diversidad deformas políticas misisipianas y presenta una alternativa para explicar los cambios en el tamaño, complejidad v ubicación de los centros con montículos.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Anderson, D. G. 1994 The Savannah River Chiefdoms. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Anderson, D. G. 1996a Fluctuations between Simple and Complex Chiefdoms: Cycling in the Late Prehistoric Southeast. In Political Structure and Change in the Prehistoric Southeastern United States, edited by Scarry, J. F., pp. 231252. The Ripley P. Bullen Series, Florida Museum of Natural History, The University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Anderson, D. G. 1996b Chiefly Cycling and Large-Scale Abandonments as Viewed from the Savannah River Basin. In Political Structure and Change in the Prehistoric Southeastern United States, edited by Scarry, J. F., pp. 150191. The Ripley P. Bullen Series, Florida Museum of Natural History, University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Anderson, D. G., Hally, D. J., and Rudolph, J. L. 1986 The Mississippian Occupation of the Savannah River Valley. Southeastern Archaeology 5: 3251.Google Scholar
Blitz, J. H. 1993 Ancient Chiefdoms of the Tomhighee. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Bozeman, T. K. 1981 Moundville Phase Sites in the Black Warrior Valley: Preliminary Results of the UMMA Survey. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 24: 8486.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, E. M., and Fox, J. W. (editors) 1994 Factional Competition in the New World. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, R. B. 1997 The Mississippian Succession on the Lower Ohio. Southeastern Archaeology 16: 1632.Google Scholar
DePratter, C. B. 1991 Late Prehistoric and Early Historic Chiefdoms in the Southeastern United States. Garland, New York.Google Scholar
Emerson, T. E. 1997 Cahokia and the Archaeology of Power. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Galloway, P. 1994 Confederacy as a Solution to Chiefdom Dissolution: Historical Evidence in the Choctaw Case. In The Forgotten Centuries: Indians and Europeans in the American South 1521-1704, edited by Hudson, C. and Tesser, C.C. pp. 393^-20. University of Georgia Press, Athens.Google Scholar
Galloway, P. 1995 Choctaw Genesis 1500-1700. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
Garland, E. B. 1992 The Obion Site, An Early Mississippian Center in Western Tennessee. Report of Investigations 7. Cobb Institute of Archaeology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State.Google Scholar
Haas, M. R. 1940 Creek Inter-Town Relations. American Anthropologist 42: 479189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hally, D. J. 1993 The Territorial Size of Mississippian Chiefdoms. In Archaeology of Eastern North America, Papers in Honor of Stephen Williams, edited by Stoltman, J. B., pp. 143168. Archaeological Report No. 25. Mississippi Department of Archives and History, Jackson.Google Scholar
Hally, D. J. 1994a An Overview of Lamar Culture. In Ocmulgee Archaeology 1936-1986, edited by Hally, D. J., pp. 144174. University of Georgia Press, Athens.Google Scholar
Hally, D. J. 1994b The Chiefdom of Coosa. In The Forgotten Centuries: Indians and Europeans in the American South 1521-1704, edited by Hudson, C. and Tesser, C.C. pp. 227253. University of Georgia Press, Athens.Google Scholar
Hally, D. J. 1996 Platform-Mound Construction and the Instability of Mississippian Chiefdoms. In Political Structure and Change in the Prehistoric Southeastern United States, edited by Scarry, J. F., pp. 92127. The Ripley P. Bullen Series. Florida Museum of Natural History, University Press of Florida. Gainesville.Google Scholar
Hally, D. J., and Langford, J. B. Jr. 1988 Mississippi Period Archaeology of the Georgia Valley and Ridge Province. Laboratory of Archaeology Series Report 25. Department of Anthropology, University of Georgia, Athens.Google Scholar
Hally, D. J., and Langford, J. B. Jr. 1990 The Archaeological Reality of DeSoto's Coosa. Columbian Consequences, Vol. 2, Archaeological and Historical Perspectives on the Spanish Borderlands East, edited by Thomas, D. H., pp. 121138. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.Google Scholar
Howard, J. H. 1968 The Southeastern Ceremonial Complex and Its Interpretation. Memoir No. 6. Missouri Archaeological Society, Columbia.Google Scholar
Hudson, C. 1976 The Southeastern Indians. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.Google Scholar
Hudson, C. 1997 Knights of Spain, Warriors of the Sun. University of Georgia Press, Athens.Google Scholar
Hudson, C. M., Smith, M. T., Hally, D. J., Polhemus, R., 1985 Coosa: A Chiefdom in the Sixteenth-Century United States. American Antiquity 52: 84085.Google Scholar
Johnson, G. A. 1977 Aspects of Regional Analysis in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 6: 479506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G. A. 1987 The Changing Organization of Uruk Administration on the Susiana Plain. In The Archaeology of Western Iran, edited by Hole, F., pp. 107155. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
King, A. 1996 Tracing Organizational Change in Mississippian Chiefdoms of the Etowah River Valley, Georgia. Ph.D. dissertation, Pennsylvania State University. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
King, A., and Freer, J. A. 1995 The Mississippian Southeast: A World-Systems Perspective. In Native American Interactions: Multiscalar Analyses and Interpretations in the Eastern Woodlands, edited by Nassaney, M. S. and Sassaman, K.E. pp. 266288. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.Google Scholar
Knight, V. J. Jr. 1979 Ceramic Stratigraphy at the Singer-Moye Site, 9SW2. Journal of Alabama Archaeology 25: 138151.Google Scholar
Knight, V. J. Jr. 1989 Symbolism of Mississippian Mounds. In Powhattan's Mantle, Indians of the Colonial Southeast, edited by Wood, P. H., Waselkov, G. A., and Hatley, M. T., pp. 279291. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
Knight, V. J. Jr. 1990 Social Organization and the Evolution of Hierarchy in Southeastern Chiefdoms. Journal of Anthropological Research 44-23. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, V. J. Jr. 1998 Moundville as a Diagrammatic Center. In Archaeology of the Moundville Chiefdom, edited by V. J. Knight Jr. and V. P. Steponaitis, pp. 4462. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Krause, R. A. 1988 The Snodgrass Small Mound and Middle Tennessee Valley Prehistory. Publications in Anthropology 52. Tennessee Valley Authority, Chattanooga.Google Scholar
Lankford, G. E. 1981 A Documentary Study of Native American Life in the Lower Tombigbee Valley. Report submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Mobile District.Google Scholar
Lindauer, O., and Blitz, J. H. 1997 Higher Ground: The Archaeology of North American Platform Mounds. Journal of Archaeological Research 5: 169207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, K. G. 1996 Small-Scale Mississippian Community Organization in the Big Black River Valley of Mississippi. Southeastern Archaeology 15: 145171.Google Scholar
McDowell, W. L. Jr. (editor) 1958 Documents Relating to Indian Affairs, May 21, 1750-August 7, 1754. Colonial Records of South Carolina. South Carolina Archives Department, Columbia.Google Scholar
Mereness, N. D. (editor) 1916 Travels in the American Colonies. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Milner, G. R. 1990 The Late Prehistoric Cahokia Cultural System of the Mississippi River Valley: Foundations, Florescence, and Fragmentation. Journal of World Prehistory 4: 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, G. R. 1998 The Cahokia Chiefdom: The Archaeology of a Mississippian Society. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Muller, J. 1997 Mississippian Political Economy. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, J. 1988 Nairne's Muskhogeon Journals: The 1708 Expedition to the Mississippi River, edited by Moore, A.. University Press of Mississippi, Jackson.Google Scholar
O'Brien, P. 1989 Cahokia: The Political Capital of the “Ramey” State? North American Archaeologist 10: 275292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peebles, C. S. 1971 Moundville and Surrounding Sites: Some Structural Considerations of Mortuary Practices II. American Antiquity 36: 6891.Google Scholar
Peebles, C. S. 1983 Moundville: Late Prehistoric Sociopolitical Organization in the Southeastern United States. In The Development of Political Organization in Native North America, edited by Tooker, E., pp. 183198. The American Ethnological Society, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Peebles, C. S., and Kus, S. M. 1977 Some Archaeological Correlates of Ranked Societies. American Antiquity 42: 42128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rafferty, J. 1995 Owl Creek Mounds: Test Excavations at a Vacant Mississippian Mound Center. Report of Investigations 7. Cobb Institute of Archaeology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State.Google Scholar
Reid, J. P. 1970 A Law of Blood: Primitive Law of the Cherokee Nation. New York University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1975 Trade as Action at a Distance: Questions of Integration and Communication. In Ancient Civilization and Trade, edited by Sabloff, J. A. and Lomberg-Karlovsky, C. L., pp. 359. University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Rogers, J. D., and Smith, B. D. (editors) 1995 Mississippian Communities and Households. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Scarry, J. F. (editor) 1996 Political Structure and Change in the Prehistoric Southeastern United Stales. The Ripley P. Bullen Series, Florida Museum of Natural History, The University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Scarry, J. E, and Payne, C. 1986 Mississippian Polities in the Fort Walton Area: A Model Generated from the Renfrew- Level XTENT Algorithm. Southeastern Archaeology 5: 7990.Google Scholar
Schroedl, G. E 1994 A Comparison of the Origins of Macon Plateau and Hiwassee Island Cultures. In Ocmulgee Archaeology 1936-1986, edited by Hally, D. J., pp. 138143. University of Georgia Press, Athens.Google Scholar
Smith, B. D. 1984 Mississippian Expansion: Tracing the Historical Development of an Explanatory Model. Southeastern Archaeology 3: 1322.Google Scholar
Steponaitis, V. P. 1978 Locational Theory and Complex Chiefdoms: A Mississippian Example. In Mississippian Settlement Patterns, edited by Smith, B. D., pp. 417^453. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Steponaitis, V. P. 1986 Prehistoric Archaeology in the Southeastern United States, 1970-1985. Annual Review of Anthropology 15: 363104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanton, J. R. 1911 Indian Tribes of the Lower Mississippi Valley and Adjacent Coast of the Gulf of Mexico. Bulletin No. 43. Bureau of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Swanton, J. R. 1928a The Interpretation of Aboriginal Mounds by Means of Creek Indian Customs. Annual Report for 1927, pp. 495506. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Swanton, J. R. 1928b Social Organization and Social Usages of the Indians of the Creek Confederacy. Forty-Second Annual Report 1924-1925, pp. 25172. Bureau of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Swanton, J. R. 1931 Modern Square Grounds of the Creek Indians. Miscellaneous Collections 85(8). Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Swanton, J. R. 1979 The Indians of the Southeastern United States. Reprinted. Classics of Smithsonian Anthropology, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. Originally published 1946, Bulletin No. 137, Bureau of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Waring, A. J. Jr. 1968 The Southern Cult and Muskhogean Ceremonial. In The Waring Papers, edited by Williams, S., pp. 3069. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology 58, Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Welch, P. D. 1991 Moundville's Economy. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Welch, P. D. 1994 The Occupational History of the Bessemer Site. Southeastern Archaeology 13: 126.Google Scholar
Williams, M. 1994 The Origins of the Macon Plateau Site. In Ocmulgee Archaeology 1936-1986, edited by Hally, D. J., pp. 130137. University of Georgia Press, Athens.Google Scholar
Williams, M., and Shapiro, G. 1990 Paired Towns. In Lamar Archaeology, Mississippian Chiefdoms in the Deep South, edited by Williams, M. and Shapiro, G., pp. 163174. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Williams, M., and Shapiro, G. 1996 Mississippian Political Dynamics in the Oconee Valley, Georgia. In Political Structure and Change in the Prehistoric Southeastern United States, edited by Scarry, J. F., pp. 128149. The Ripley P. Bullen Series, Florida Museum of Natural History, University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Willis, W. S. Jr. 1980 Fusion and Separation: Archaeology and Ethnohistory in Southeastern North America. In Theory and Practice: Essays Presented to Gene Weltfish, edited by Diamond, S., pp. 97123. Mouton Publications, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, H. T 1984 Prestate Political Formations. In On the Evolution of Complex Societies, Essays in Honor of Harry Hoijer, 1982, edited by Earle, T K., pp. 4178. Undena Press, Malibu, California.Google Scholar