Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:18:12.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modeling Colonial Paternalism: GIS and Multispectral Satellite Imagery at Kingstown, British Virgin Islands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2021

John M. Chenoweth*
Affiliation:
Department of Behavioral Sciences, University of Michigan-Dearborn, 4901 Evergreen Road, Dearborn, MI48170, USA
Laura M. Bossio
Affiliation:
Museum of Anthropological Archaeology, University of Michigan, 3010 School of Education Building, 610 E. University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI48109, USA
Mark Salvatore
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy and Planetary Science, Northern Arizona University, NAU Box 6010, Flagstaff, AZ 86011-6010, USA
*
(jmchenow@umich.edu, corresponding author)

Abstract

GIS modeling and analysis of multispectral satellite imagery are applied to a former plantation in the British Virgin Islands (BVI), which, in 1831, became a settlement of free Africans who lived within slavery-based British colonialism. A map of the settlement represents the paternalist British government ideal for this community—an “experiment” for controlling a postemancipation peasantry—and the techniques discussed here allow clearer understanding of the way these ideals would have interacted with the physical and social landscape of the BVI had they been implemented. The residents were certainly aware of their situation, and this study does not mean to imply that they simply adopted the plan they were handed. Instead, our goal is to interrogate the implications of the plan itself. We combine least cost path (LCP), Normalized Difference Vegetation Indexes (NDVI), and other technical analyses to show the interaction of the British plan and the BVI landscape in order to describe the context in which the Kingstown community was built and maintained. Although schematic, this study quantifies at least some of the barriers the community overcame and contributes in a limited way to broader considerations of the place of land and landscape in structures of colonialism.

Análisis y modelos de imágenes satelitales multiespectrales de SIG, fueron aplicadas a una antigua plantación en las Islas Vírgenes Británicas (IVB), las cuales en 1831, llegaron a asentarse de africanos libres quienes vivían dentro del colonialism británico basado en la esclavitud. El mapa del asentimiento simboliza el ideal paternalista del gobierno Británico para esta comunidad —como una “experimentación” para controlar la posterior liberación del campesinado— y las técnicas examinadas permiten un claro entendimiento de la manera en las cuales estos ideales hubieran interactuado con el entorno físico y social de las IVB si hubiesen sido establecidos. Los residentes estaban ciertamente conscientes de su situación y esta investigación no tiene la intención de insinuar que los residentes simplemente adoptaron el ideal que les fue proporcionado; al contrario, nuestro objetivo es cuestionar las implicaciones del ideal en sí mismo. Hemos combinado la técnica de Least Cost Path (LCP por sus siglas en inglés), el Índice de Vegetación de la Diferencia Normalizada (NVDI), junto a otros análisis técnicos a fin de exhibir la interacción entre el ideal Británico y el panorama de las IVB con el propósito de caracterizar el contexto en el que la comunidad de Kingstown fue construida y mantenida. Aunque sea esquemático, este estudio cuantifica al menos algunos de los obstáculos superados por la comunidad y contribuye en una manera limitada consideraciones más amplias sobre el ambiente del panorama cultural y el territorio dentro de las estructuras del colonialismo.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for American Archaeology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Adderley, Rosanne Marion 2006 “New Negroes from Africa”: Slave Trade Abolition and Free African Settlement in the Nineteenth-Century Caribbean. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Douglas V. 1990 The Old Village and the Great House: An Archaeological and Historical Examination of Drax Hall Plantation, St. Ann's Bay, Jamaica. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
Barnes, Jodi A. (editor) 2011 The Materiality of Freedom: Archaeologies of Postemancipation Life. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia.Google Scholar
Bates, Lynsey 2016 Provisioning and Marketing: Surplus and Access on Jamaican Sugar Estates. In Archaeologies of Slavery and Freedom in the Caribbean: Exploring the Spaces in Between, edited by Bates, Lynsey, Chenoweth, John M., and Delle, James A., pp. 79110. University of Florida Press, Gainesville.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Lynsey, Chenoweth, John M., and Delle, James A. (editors) 2016 Archaeologies of Freedom and Slavery in the Caribbean: Exploring the Spaces in Between. University of Florida Press, Gainesville.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battle-Baptiste, Whitney 2011 Black Feminist Archaeology. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
Camp, Stephanie M. H. 2004 Closer to Freedom: Enslaved Women and Everyday Resistance in the Plantation South. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Chenoweth, John M. 2017 Simplicity, Equality, and Slavery: An Archaeology of Quakerism in the British Virgin Islands, 1740–1780. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chenoweth, John M. 2018 Marine Shell and Small Island Slavery. Historical Archaeology 52:467488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Certeau, Michel 1984 The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated by Rendall, Steven F.. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Delle, James A. 2016 Life beyond the Village: Field Houses and Liminal Space on a Jamaican Coffee Plantation. In Archaeologies of Slavery and Freedom in the Caribbean: Exploring the Spaces in Between, edited by Bates, Lynsey, Chenoweth, John M., and Delle, James A., pp. 111128. University of Florida Press, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Dietler, Michael 1998 Consumption, Agency, and Cultural Entanglement: Theoretical Implications of a Mediterranean Colonial Encounter. In Studies in Culture Contact: Interaction, Culture Change, and Archaeology, edited by Cusick, James G., pp. 288315. Occasional Paper No. 25. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Dookhan, Isaac 1975 A History of the British Virgin Islands, 1672 to 1970. Caribbean Universities Press in association with Bowker Pub. Co., Epping, UK.Google Scholar
Flewellen, Ayana Omilade 2019 African Diasporic Choices: Locating the Lived Experiences of Afro-Crucians in the Archival and Archaeological Record. NTiK: Nordisk Tidsskrift for Informationsvidenskab Og Kulturformidling 8(2):5474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Given, Michael 2004 Archaeology of the Colonized. Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Tennant, Edward 2016 Recent Directions and Future Developments in Geographic Information Systems for Historical Archaeology. Historical Archaeology 50(3):2449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goucher, Candice 1999 African-Caribbean Metal Technology: Forging Cultural Survivals in the Atlantic World. In African Sites Archaeology in the Caribbean, edited by Haviser, Jay B., pp. 143156. Marcus Wiener Publishers, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Hare, Timothy S. 2004 Using Measures of Cost Distance in the Estimation of Polity Boundaries in the Postclassic Yautepec Valley, Mexico. Journal of Archaeological Science 31:799814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrigan, Norwell, and Varlack, Pearl 1975 The Virgin Islands Story. Caribbean Universities Press, Kingston, Jamaica.Google Scholar
Herzog, Irmela 2014 A Review of Case Studies in Archaeological Least-Cost Analysis. Archeologia e Calcolatori 25:223239.Google Scholar
Hicks, Dan 2007 “The Garden of the World”: An Historical Archaeology of Sugar Landscapes in the Eastern Caribbean. British Archaeological Reports 1632. Archaeopress, Oxford.Google Scholar
Higman, Barry 1998 Montpelier, Jamaica: A Plantation Community in Slavery and Freedom, 1739–1912. University of the West Indies Press, Kingston, Jamaica.Google Scholar
House of Commons 1825 Further Papers Related to Captured Negroes . . . 16 March, 1825. UK Parliamentary Papers 1825 XXV.575 (115).Google Scholar
House of Commons 1831 Africans Captured . . . UK Parliamentary Papers XIX.261 (304).Google Scholar
House of Commons 1837–1838 Negroe Education . . . UK Parliamentary Papers XLVIII (520).Google Scholar
House of Commons 1864 Reports Made for the Year 1862 . . . UK Parliamentary Papers XL.1 (3304).Google Scholar
Lucas, Gavin 2004 An Archaeology of Colonial Identity: Power and Material Culture in the Dwars Valley, South Africa. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Odewale, Alicia 2019 An Archaeology of Struggle: Material Remnants of a Double Consciousness in the American South and Danish Caribbean Communities. Transforming Anthropology 27:114132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neal, Michael E. 2012 Slavery, Smallholding, and Tourism: Social Transformations in the British Virgin Islands. Quid Pro Books, New Orleans, Louisiana.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1990 Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Silliman, Stephen 2001a Agency, Practical Politics and the Archaeology of Culture Contact. Journal of Social Archaeology 1:190209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silliman, Stephen 2001b Theoretical Perspectives on Labor and Colonialism: Reconsidering the California Missions. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 20:379407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silliman, Stephen 2004 Lost Laborers in Colonial California: Native Americans and the Archaeology of Rancho Petaluma. University of Arizona Press, Tuscon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singleton, Theresa A. 1988 An Archaeological Framework for Slavery and Emancipation, 1740–1880. In The Recovery of Meaning: Historical Archaeology in the Eastern United States, edited by Leone, Mark P. and Potter, Parker B., pp. 345370. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Singleton, Theresa A. 1998 Cultural Interaction and African American Identity in Plantation Archaeology. In Studies in Culture Contact: Interaction, Culture Change, and Archaeology, edited by Cusick, James G., pp. 172190. Occasional Paper No. 25. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Smith, Katherine A. 2009 Forging an Identity: British Virgin Islands' Slave Society 1672–1838. PhD dissertation, Department of History, Howard University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Tobler, Waldo 1993 Three Presentations on Geographical Analysis and Modeling. Technical Report 93-1. National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, Santa Barbara, California.Google Scholar
White, Devin A., and Surface-Evans, Sarah (editors) 2012 Least Cost Analysis of Social Landscapes: Archaeological Case Studies. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Wilkie, Laurie 1999 Evidence of African Continuities in the Material Culture of Clifton Plantation, Bahamas. In African Sites Archaeology in the Caribbean, edited by Haviser, Jay B., pp. 264276. Marcus Wiener Publishers, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Wilkie, Laurie 2000 Culture Bought: Evidence of Creolization in the Consumer Goods of an Enslaved Bahamian Family. Historical Archaeology 34(3):1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkie, Laurie 2001 Methodist Intentions and African Sensibilities: The Victory of African Consumerism over Planter Paternalism at a Bahamian Plantation. In Island Lives: Historical Archaeologies of the Caribbean, edited by Farnsworth, Paul, pp. 272300. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Wilkie, Laurie, and Farnsworth, Paul 2005 Sampling Many Pots: An Archaeology of Memory and Tradition at a Bahamian Plantation. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Chenoweth et al. supplementary material

Chenoweth et al. supplementary material

Download Chenoweth et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 211.4 KB