Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:10:39.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Obsidian Sources and Elemental Analyses of Artifacts in Southern Mesoamerica and the Northern Intermediate Area

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Payson Sheets ,
Kenneth Hirth ,
Fred Lange ,
Fred Stross ,
Frank Asaro  and
Helen Michel
Payson Sheets
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Colorado, Boulder CO 80309
Kenneth Hirth
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Kentucky, Lexington KY 40506
Fred Lange
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Museum, University of Colorado, Boulder CO 80309
Fred Stross
Affiliation:
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley CA 94720
Frank Asaro
Affiliation:
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley CA 94720
Helen Michel
Affiliation:
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley CA 94720
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Obsidian sources, and the proportions of those sources represented in site collections, are known poorly in the southeast mesoamerican periphery. The Honduran sources of La Esperanza and Güinope are described and “fingerprinted” chemically, and their utilization is explored in selected sites in Honduras, Nicaragua, and Costa Rica. Although prehistoric Nicaraguans and Costa Ricans used obsidian from sources as far away as Honduras and Guatemala, most of their cutting tools were made from local materials, using informal manufacturing techniques. The analytical results indicate two sources of new types of obsidian have yet to be found; they may lie in western Nicaragua.

Résumé

Résumé

Losfuentes naturales de obsidiana, y como ellos estan representados en colecciónes de sitios arqueólogicos, no son bien conocidos al suroeste de Mesoamerica. Datos descriptivos y quimicos de los fuentes hondureños La Esperanza y Güinope son presentados. Tambien, la llegada y uso de la obsidiana de estos fuentes en sitios arqueológicos en Honduras, Nicaragua, y Costa Rica son considerados. Aunque los indios prehistóricos de Nicaragua y Costa Rica usaron obsidiana de Honduras y Guatemala, de fuentes a larga distancia, hicieron la mayoria de sus artefactos para cortar de materiales locales, con un técnico no complicado. Los datos indican que por lo menos hay dos tipos de obsidiana en la zona con fuentes todavía desconocidos; tal \ez queden en el oeste de Nicaragua.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 55 , Issue 1 , January 1990 , pp. 144 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Asaro, F., Michel, H. V., Sidrys, R., and Stross, F. 1978 High-Precision Chemical Characterization of Major Obsidian Sources in Guatemala. American Antiquity 43: 436–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullen, R. P., and Plowden, W. W. Jr., 1963 Preceramic Archaic Sites in the Highlands of Honduras. American Antiquity 28: 382–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, A. 1982 Recent Research. Ms. on file, Instituto Hondureno de Anthropologia e Historia, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.Google Scholar
Coe, M. D., and Flannery, K. V. 1964 The Precolumbian Obsidian Industry of El Chayal, Guatemala. American Antiquity 30: 43–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, P. F. 1980 Archaeology of the Rivas Region, Nicaragua. Wilfrid Laurier University Press, Waterloo, Ontario.Google Scholar
Hirth, K. G. 1985 La Subsistencia e el Comercio en el Area de El Cayon, Honduras. Paper presented at the Tercero Seminario de Arqueologia Hondurena, Tela, Honduras.Google Scholar
Hirth, K. G. 1988 Beyond the Maya Frontier: Cultural Interaction and Syncretism Along the Central Honduran Corridor. In The Southeast Classic Maya Zone, edited by Boone, E. and Willey, G., pp. 294–334. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington D. C.Google Scholar
Lange, F., and Stone, D. (editors) 1984 The Archaeology of Lower Central America. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Lunardi, F. 1948 Honduras Maya: Ethnologia y Arqueologia de Honduras. Tegucigalpa, Honduras.Google Scholar
Perlman, I., and Asaro, F. 1969 Pottery Analysis by Neutron Activation. Archaeometry 11: 21–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlman, I., and Asaro, F. 1971 Pottery Analysis by Neutron Activation. In Science and Archaeology, edited by Brill, R. H., pp. 182–195. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Sheets, P. 1975 A Reassessment of the Precolumbia Obsidian Industry of El Chayal, Guatemala. American Antiquity 40: 98–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheets, P. 1978 Artifacts. In Artifacts and Figurines, edited by Sheets, P. D. and Dahlin, B. H., pp. 1–131. The Prehistory of Chalchuapa, El Salvador, vol. 2, Sharer, R., general editor. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Sheets, P. 1983 Guatemalan Obsidian: A Preliminary Study of Sources and Quirigua Artifacts. In Quirigua Reports II, edited by Sharer, R., pp. 87–101. University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Sorensen, J., and Hirth, K. 1984 Minas Precolombinas y Talleres de Obsidiana en La Esperanza, Departamento de Intibuca. Yaxkin 7: 31–45.Google Scholar
Stross, F., Sheets, P., Asaro, F., and Michel, H. V. 1983 Precise Characterization of Guatemalan Obsidian Sources, and Source Determination of Artifacts from Quirigua. American Antiquity 48: 323–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar