Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:33:00.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Methodology of Faunal Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Donald K. Grayson
Donald K. Grayson*
Affiliation:
Division of Social Sciences, Kirkland College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although faunal analysis has a long history in archaeological studies, little emphasis has been placed upon the development of methodologies which would allow the valid and reliable analysis of animal remains from archaeological sites. The most crucial decision which a faunal analyst must make as regards the statistical manipulation of his data concerns the proper unit to use in that manipulation. The 2 units which seem to have gained most popularity in faunal studies are discussed, as are the generally non-comparable results which stem from the various ways in which 1 of these units—the minimum number of individuals—has been applied. Finally, suggestions for the standardization of the use of minimum numbers in faunal analysis are made.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , October 1973 , pp. 432 - 439
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, H. L. Jr., 1963 The Levi site: a Paleo-Indian campsite in central Texas. American Antiquity 38:510–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaplin, R. E. 1971 The study of animal bones from archaeological Sites. Seminar Press, New York.Google Scholar
Cleland, Charles E. 1966 The prehistoric animal ecology and ethnozoology of the upper Great Lakes region. University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology, Anthropological Papers 29.Google Scholar
Coe, Michael D., and Flannery, Kent V. 1967 Early cultures and human ecology in south coastal Guatemala. Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornwall, I. W. 1956 Bones for the archaeologist. Phoenix House, London.Google Scholar
Flannery, Kent V. 1967 The vertebrate fauna and hunting patterns. In The prehistory of the Tehaucan Valley, Vol. 1, edited by Byers, Douglas S., pp. 132–178. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Harris, Arthur H. 1963 Vertebrate remains and past environmental reconstruction in the Navajo Reservoir District. Museum of New Mexico, Papers in Anthropology 11.Google Scholar
Howard, Hildegarde 1930 A census of the Pleistocene birds of Rancho La Brea from the collections of the Los Angeles Museum. Condor 32:81–88.Google Scholar
Howard, Hildegarde, and Miller, Alden H. 1940 The avifauna associated with human remains at Rancho La Brea, California. In Studies of Cenozoic vertebrates and stratigraphy of western North America. Carnegie Institute of Washington, Publication 514.Google Scholar
Linares de Sapir, Olga 1971 Cerro Brujo: a tiny Guaymi hamlet of the past. Expedition 13:27–35.Google Scholar
Linares de Sapir, Olga, and Ranere, Anthony J. 1971 Human adaptation to the tropical forests of western Panama. Archaeology 24:346–355.Google Scholar
Meighan, C. W. 1959 The Little Harbor site, Catalina Island: an example of ecological interpretation in archaeology. American Antiquity 24:383405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, Stanley J. 1960 Post-cranial skeletal characters of Bison and Bos. Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Papers 35:4.Google Scholar
Olsen, Stanley J. 1964 Mammal remains from archaeological sites, part 1, southeastern and southwestern United States. Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Papers 61:1.Google Scholar
Olsen, Stanley J. 1968 Fish, amphibian, and reptile remains from archaeological sites, part 1, southeastern and southwestern United States. Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Papers 61:2.Google Scholar
Olsen, Stanley J. 1971 Zooarchaeology: animal bones in archaeology and their interpretation. Addison-Wesley, Reading.Google Scholar
Sears, W. H. 1956 Excavations at Kolomoki (final report). University of Georgia Series in Anthropology 5.Google Scholar
Shotwell, J. Arnold 1955 An approach to the paleoecology of mammals. Ecology 36:327–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shotwell, J. Arnold 1958 Inter-community relationships in Hemphillian (mid-Pliocene) mammals. Ecology 39:271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shotwell, J. Arnold 1963 Pliocene mammalian communities of the Juntura Basin. In The Juntura Basin: studies in earth history and paleoecology, by J. Arnold Shotwell and others. American Philosophical Society, Transactions 53:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, Chester 1929 A census of the Pleistocene mammals of Rancho La Brea, based on the collections of the Los Angeles Museum. Journal of Mammalogy 10:281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, David H. 1969 Great Basin hunting patterns: a quantitative method for treating faunal remains. American Antiquity 34:392–401.Google Scholar
Thomas, David H. 1971 On Distinguishing natural from cutlural bone in archaeological sites. American Antiquity 36:366–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritz, John M., and Plog, Fred T. 1953a A method of calculating the dietary percentages of various food animals utilized by aboriginal peoples. American Antiquity 18:396–398.Google Scholar
Fritz, John M., and Plog, Fred T. 1953b Observations on the butchering technique of some aboriginal peoples, no. 2. American Antiquity 19:160–164.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. 1960 Early Miocene rodents and insectivores from northeastern Colorado. University of Kansas, Paleontological Contributions 7:1–92.Google Scholar