Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:02:09.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Paleolithic of Trans-Baikal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

A. P. Okladnikov  and
Chester S. Chard
A. P. Okladnikov
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, Leningrad, U.S.S.R.
Chester S. Chard
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, Leningrad, U.S.S.R.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Paleolithic remains, mostly surface finds from blowouts, are known from 63 sites in the Trans-Baikal, one of the five large regional subdivisions of the Siberian Paleolithic. Most important recent discoveries are the stratified sites of Oshurkovo and Sannyi Mys and the Pleistocene faunal sequence on Tologoi Mountain. Characteristic stone tools are made from whole or split pebbles and from blades removed from prismatic cores. Bone artifacts, known only from Oshurkovo, include slotted points and knives and flat antler harpoons. The Trans-Baikal finds, all Upper Paleolithic in time, are tentatively arranged in five chronological stages. The earliest period is based on the lower levels at Sannyi Mys in which microblades, but no pebble tools, are found with woolly rhinoceros and mammoth. The next period is represented by large pebble tools and cores from Ust"-Kiakhta Locality 3. Typical Siberian pebble tools found with horse in the upper levels at Sannyi Mys are assigned to the third stage. The fourth is best known from Oshurkovo where all the common Siberian Paleolithic stone tools are found along with bone artifacts in deposits which contain abundant fish bones. A number of sites are assigned to the fifth stage, but it is best represented by the uppermost level at Oshurkovo where flakes, flaked pebbles, and small blade tools of regular outline replace the large blades and pebble cores of the earlier periods. This tentative sequence is strengthened by correlations with the Angara and Yenisei areas to the west and with Mongolia and North China to the east. The Trans-Baikal is seen as an area in which the prismatic core and blade tradition of Eurafrican origin and the split pebble-tool tradition of eastern Asia were in contact from the earliest known period.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , April 1961 , pp. 486 - 497
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibikova, V. I., Vereshchagin, N. K., Garutt, V. E., and Iur'ev, K. B. 1953. Novye Materialy po Chetvertichnoi Faune Zabaikal'ia [New Materials on the Pleistocene Fauna of Trans-Baikal]. Materialy i Issledovaniia po Arkheologii SSSR, No. 39, pp. 463–75. Moscow and Leningrad.Google Scholar
Beregovaia, N. A. 1960. Paleolitkheskie Mestonakhozhdeniia SSSR [Paleolithic Sites in the U.S.S.R.]. Materialy i Issledovaniia po Arkheologii SSSR, No. 81. Moscow and Leningrad.Google Scholar
Debets, G. F. 1930. Opyt Vydeleniia Kul'turnykh Kompleksov v Neolite Pribaikal'ia [An Attempt at Distinguishing Cultural Complexes in the Neolithic of the Baikal Region]. Izvestiia Assotsiatsii Nauchno-Issledovatel'nykh Institutov pri Fiz-Mat. Fakult., I, Mosk. Gosud. Universitet, Vol. 3, No. 2–A, pp. 151–69. Moscow.Google Scholar
Gromov, V. I. 1948. Paleontologicheskoe i Arkheologicheskoe Obosnovanie Stratigram Kontinental'nykh Otlozhenii Chetvertichnogo Perioda na Territorii SSSR [Paleontological and Archaeological Basis for the Stratigraphy of the Continental Deposits of the Pleistocene Period on the Territory of the U.S.S.R.]. Trudy Instituta Geologicheskikh Nauk, Vyp. 69, Geologicheskaia Seriia, No. 17. Moscow.Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P. 1950. Neolit i Bronzovyi Vek Pribaikal'ia [The Neolithic and Bronze Age of the Baikal Region]. Materialy i Issledovaniia po Arkheologii SSSR, No. 18. Moscow and Leningrad.Google Scholar
Okladnikov, A. P. and Florensov, N. A. n.d. Novye Dannye po Paleolitu i Chetvertichnoi Geologii Zabaikal'ia [New Data on the Paleolithic and Pleistocene Geology of Trans-Baikal]. MS.Google Scholar
Sosnovskii, G. P. 1932. O Nakhodkakh Drevnei Kamennoi Industrii i Ostatkov Strausa v Selenginskoi Daurii [Concerning Finds of an Ancient Stone Industry and Remains of Ostrich in Selenginsk Dauria]. Soobshcheniia Gosud. Akademii lstorii Material'noi Kul'tury, 1932, Nos. 11-12, pp. 19–24. Leningrad.Google Scholar
Sosnovskii, G. P. 1934. Sledy Prebyvaniia Paleoliticheskogo Cheloveka v Zabaikal'e [Traces of the Presence of Paleolithic Man in Trans-Baikal]. Trudy Komissii po Izucheniiu Chetvertichnogo Perioda, No. 3, pp. 23–40. Leningrad.Google Scholar
Sosnovskii, G. P. 1939. Paleoliticheskie Stoianki Severnoi Azii [Paleolithic sites of Northern Asia]. Trudy II Mezhdunarod. Konfer. Assots. po Izucheniiu Chetvertichnogo Perioda Evropy, Vyp. 5. Moscow.Google Scholar