Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:05:24.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Reply to Plog and Thomas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

James W. Mueller
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , April 1978 , pp. 286 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Binford, Lewis R. 1964 A consideration of archaeological research design. American Antiquity 29:425–41.Google Scholar
Blalock, Hubert M. 1972 Social statistics. Second edition. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Cochran, William G. 1963 Sampling techniques. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Kish, Leslie 1965 Survey sampling. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Mueller, James W. 1974 The use of sampling in archaeological survey. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology 28.Google Scholar
Plog, Steve 1976 Relative efficiencies of sampling techniques for archaeological surveys. In The early mesoamerican village, edited by Flannery, Kent V., pp. 136–58. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Ragir, Sonia 1967 A review of techniques for archeological sampling. In a guide to field methods in archaeology, edited by Heizer, Robert F. and Graham, John A., pp. 181–94. The National Press, Palo Alto.Google Scholar