Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:04:14.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Second-Terrace Perspective on Monks Mound

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

James M. Collins
Affiliation:
Office of the State Archaeologist, Eastlawn, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242
Michael L. Chalfant
Affiliation:
Soil and Water Conservation Program, Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Box 1322, Marble Hill, MO 63762

Abstract

Monks Mound is a premier example of monumental architecture occupying the center of Cahokia, the largest prehistoric Indian site north of Mexico. A massive slump on the so-called "second terrace" of the mound prompted geoarchaeological testing resulting in new data concerning the age and function of this enigmatic structure. These data support theory suggesting that construction of monumental architecture is most likely to occur early in the development of complex societies, in this case the Cahokia polity. It is concluded that Monks Mound was a purposeful political tool for the manipulation of mass psychology.

Resumen

Resumen

Monks Mound es un ejemplo superior de la arquitectura monumental situada en el centro de Cahokia, el sitio arqueológico norteamericano más grande fuera de México. Un derrumbamiento macizo de tierra en el llamado "segundo terraplén" instigó las investigaciones geoarqueológicas que produjeron nuevos datos sobre la edad y función de esta estructura enigmática. Estos datos sostienen la teoría que sugiere que la construcción de la arquitectura monumental debe ocurrir temprano en la secuencia de desarrollo de las sociedades complejas, en este caso la entidad político de Cahokia. Se concluye que Monks Mound funcionó como instrumento político intencional para la manipulación psicológica de las masas.

Type
Reports
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Bareis, C. J. 1975a Report of 1972 University of Illinois-Urbana Excavations at the Cahokia Site. In Cahokia Archaeology : Field Reports, edited by Fowler, M. L., pp. 1115. Research Series, Papers in Anthropology No. 3. Illinois State Museum, Springfield.Google Scholar
Bareis, C. J. 1975b Report of 1971 University of Illinois-Urbana Excavations at the Cahokia Site. In Cahokia Archaeology : Field Reports, edited by Fowler, M. L., pp. 911. Research Series, Papers in Anthropology No. 3. Illinois State Museum, Springfield.Google Scholar
Benchley, E. D. 1975 Summary Field Report of Excavations on the Southwest Corner of the First Terrace of Monks Mound : 1968, 1969, 1971. In Cahokia Archaeology : Field Reports, edited by Fowler, M. L., pp. 1624. Research Series, Papers in Anthropology No. 3. Illinois State Museum, Springfield.Google Scholar
Bettis, E. A. III 1988 Pedogenesis in Late Prehistoric Indian Mounds, Upper Mississippi Valley. Physical Geography 9 : 263279.Google Scholar
Collins, J. M. 1990 The Archaeology of the Cahokia Mounds ICT-II : Site Structure. Illinois Cultural Resources Study No. 10. Illinois Historic Preservation Agency, Springfield.Google Scholar
Collins, J. M., Chalfant, M. L., and Holley, G. R. 1986 Archaeological Testing of the Slump Area on the West Face of Monks Mound, Madison County, Illinois. Report submitted to the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency, Springfield. Copies available from the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency, Springfield.Google Scholar
DeHass, W. 1869 Archaeology of the Mississippi Valley. Proceedings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. 17 th Meeting Held at Chicago, Illinois, August, 1868, pp. 288302. Joseph Lovering, Springfield, Illinois.Google Scholar
Emerson, T. E., and Woods, W. I. 1990 The Slumping of the Great Knob : An Archaeological and Geotechnic Case Study of the Stability of a Great Earthen Mound. In 6th International Conference on the Conservation of Earthen Architecture, Adobe 90 Preprints, pp. 219224. The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Fowler, M. L. 1969 The Cahokia Site. In Explorations into Cahokia Archaeology, edited by Fowler, M. L., pp. 130. Bulletin No. 7. Illinois Archaeological Survey, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Fowler, M. L. 1978 Cahokia and the American Bottom : Settlement Archaeology. In Mississippian Settlement Patterns, edited by Smith, B. D., pp. 455478. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Fowler, M. L. 1989 The Cahokia Atlas : A Historical Atlas of Cahokia Archaeology. Studies in Illinois Archaeology No. 6. Illinois Historic Preservation Agency, Springfield.Google Scholar
Fowler, M. L. 1991 Mound 72 and Early Mississippian at Cahokia. In New Perspectives on Cahokia : Views From the Periphery, edited by Stoltman, J. B., pp. 128. Monographs in World Archaeology No. 2. Prehistory Press, Madison.Google Scholar
Fowler, M. L., and Hall, R. L. 1975 Archaeological Phases at Cahokia. In Perspectives in Cahokia Archaeology, edited by Brown, J. A., pp. 114. Bulletin No. 10. Illinois Archaeological Survey, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Freimuth, G. A. 1974 The Lunsford-Pulcher Site : An Examination of Selected Traits and Their Social Implications in American Bottom Prehistory [unpublished pre-dissertation paper]. Ms. on file, Department of Anthropology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. B. 1977 The University of Michigan Excavations at the Pulcher Site in 1950. American Antiquity 42 : 462488.Google Scholar
Holley, G. R. 1989 The Archaeology of the Cahokia Mounds ICT-II : Ceramics. Illinois Cultural Resources Study No. 11. Illinois Historic Preservation Agency, Springfield.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. E. 1982 Formative Developments at Cahokia and the Adjacent American Bottom : A Merrell Tract Perspective. Archaeological Research Laboratory, Western Illinois University, Macomb.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. E. 1988 Archaeological Investigations of the East St. Louis Mound Center : Past and Present. Paper presented at the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Midwest Archaeological Conference, Urbana, Illinois.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. E., Ozuk, S. J., Jackson, D. K., McElrath, D. L., Finney, F. A., and Esarey, D. 1984 Emergent Mississippian Period. In American Bottom Archaeology, edited by Bareis, C. J. and Porter, J. W., pp. 128157. University of Illinois Press, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Li, L. C. 1943 Rate of Soil Development as Indicated by Profile Studies of Indian Mounds. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Geology, University of Illinois, Urbana.Google Scholar
Mathes Geotechnical Services, Inc. 1988 Monks Mound Stabilization, Cahokia Mounds State Historical Site. Report submitted to the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency, Springfield. Copies available from the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency, Springfield.Google Scholar
McAdams, W. 1887 Records of Ancient Races in the Mississippi Valley. C. R. Barnes, St. Louis.Google Scholar
McGimsey, C. R., and Wiant, M. D. 1984 Limited Archaeological Investigations at Monks Mound : Some Perspectives on its Stability, Structure, and Age. Studies in Illinois Archaeology No. 1. Illinois Historic Preservation Agency, Springfield.Google Scholar
Milner, G. R., Emerson, T. E., Mehrer, M. W., Williams, J. A., and Esarey, D. 1984 Mississippian and Oneota Periods. In American Bottom Archaeology, edited by Bareis, C. J. and Porter, J. W., pp. 158186. University of Illinois Press, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Moorehead, W. K. 1923 The Cahokia Mounds. University of Illinois Bulletin 21, No. 6. Urbana.Google Scholar
Parsons, R. B. 1962 Indian Mounds of Northeast Iowa as Soil Genesis Benchmarks. Journal of the Iowa Archeologicai Society 12(2) : 170.Google Scholar
Porter, J. W. 1969 The Mitchell Site and Prehistoric Exchange Systems at Cahokia. In Explorations into Cahokia Archaeology, edited by Fowler, M. L., pp. 137164. Bulletin No. 7. Illinois Archaeological Survey, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Putnam, F. W., and Patrick, J. J. R. 1880 Twelfth Annual Report of the Peabody Museum. Reports of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology in Connection with Harvard University, 1876-79, vol. II. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Reed, N., Bennett, J. W., and Porter, J. W. 1968 Solid Core Drilling of Monks Mound : Technique and Findings. American Antiquity 33 : 137148.Google Scholar
Skele, M. 1988 The Great Knob : Interpretations of Monks Mound. Studies in Illinois Archaeology No. 4. Illinois Historic Preservation Agency, Springfield.Google Scholar
Snyder, J. F. 1909 Prehistoric Illinois. Certain Indian Mounds Technically Considered. Journal of the Illinois State Historical Society 2(2) : 7192.Google Scholar
Trigger, B. G. 1990 Monumental Architecture : A Thermodynamic Explanation of Symbolic Behaviour. World Archaeology 22 : 119132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walthall, J. A., and Benchley, E. D. 1987 The River LAbbe Mission. Studies in Illinois Archaeology No. 2. Illinois Historic Preservation Agency, Springfield.Google Scholar
Wild, J. C. 1841 The Valley of the Mississippi; Illustrated in a Series of Views. Chambers and Knapp, St. Louis.Google Scholar
Williams, S., and Goggin, J. M. 1956 The Long Nosed God Mask in Eastern United States. The Missouri Archaeologist 18 : 372.Google Scholar
Wittry, W. L. 1969 The American Woodhenge. In Explorations into Cahokia Archaeology, edited by Fowler, M. L., pp. 4348. Bulletin No. 7. Illinois Archaeological Survey, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar