Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:00:59.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stone Disks as Treaty “Suns”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Walter Abell*
Affiliation:
Michigan State College, East Lansing, Michigan

Extract

One of the minor mysteries of American archaeology concerns the use made by the Indians of certain stone disks found in the Mississippi Valley and the Southeast. According to Charles C. Jones, Jr., the first of these disks was “ploughed up in 1859, on the lower terrace of the large temple-mound on the Etowah River … near Cartersville,” Georgia. Other discoveries followed, and several scores of the disks are now in archaeological collections.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, Calvin S. 1926. Archeology of Mississippi. University of Missis.Google Scholar
Colden, Cadwallader 1902. History of the Five Indian Nations of Canada. N. W. Amsterdam Co., N. Y. Google Scholar
Douglas, F. H., , and R. D'Harnoncourt, 1941. Indian Art of the United States. Museum of Modern Art, N. Y. Google Scholar
Holmes, W. H. 1883. “Art in Shell of the Ancient Americans.” Bureau of American Ethnology, 2nd Annual Report, pp. 179305.Google Scholar
Holmes, W. H. 1906. “Certain Notched or Scalloped Stone Tablets of the Mound Builders.American Anthropologist, n.s., Vol.8.Google Scholar
Jones, Charles C Jr. 1873. Antiquities of the Southern Indians, Particularly of the Georgia Tribes. Appleton, N. Y. Google Scholar
Kenton, Edna 1927. The Indians of North America. 2 vols. Harcourt, Brace and Co., N. Y. Google Scholar
Moore, Clarence B. 1905. “Certain Aboriginal Remains of the Black Warrior River.Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Vol. 13, Second Series, pp. 123244.Google Scholar
Moore, Clarence B. 1907. “Moundville Revisited.Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Vol. 13, Second Series, pp. 337405.Google Scholar
Moorehead, Warren K. 1910. The Stone Age in North America. 2 vols. Houghton Mifflin, N. Y. Google Scholar
Page, J. R. 1875. “Results of Investigations of Indian Mounds.Cincinnati Quarterly Journal of Science, Vol. 2, pp. 371378.Google Scholar
Phillips, Philip 1940. “Middle American influence on the Archaeology of the Southeastern United States.” In The Maya and Their Neighbors. Appleton-Century, N. Y. Google Scholar
Spence, Lewis N. D., Mexico and Peru.Myths and Legends, Vol. 8. Nickerson Co., Boston.Google Scholar
Stoddard, H. L. 1904. “The Abstruse Significance of the Numbers Thirty-Six and Twelve.American Antiquarian and Oriental Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 153164.Google Scholar
Swanton, John R. 1928. “Social Organization and Social Usages of the Indians of the Creek Confederacy.” Bureau of American Ethnology, 42nd Annual Report, pp. 23472.Google Scholar
Thruston, Gates P. 1897. The Antiquities of Tennessee and the Adjacent States. Clarke Co., Cincinnati.Google Scholar
Waring, A. J., , and Holder, P. 1945. “A Prehistoric Ceremonial Complex in the Southeastern United States.American Anthropologist, n.s., Vol. 47, No. 1.Google Scholar
Webb, W. S., , and Dejarnette, D. L. 1942. An Archeolgoical Survey of Pickwick Basin in the Adjacent Parts of the States of Alabama, Mississippi and Tennessee. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 129.Google Scholar
Wintemberg, W. J. 1923. “Certain Eye Designs on Archaeological Artifacts from North America.Proceedings and Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, Third Series, Vol. 17, Section 2, pp. 5770.Google Scholar