Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:24:09.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Value and Diversity of Indigenous Archaeology: A Response to McGhee

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Stephen W. Silliman
Stephen W. Silliman*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA 02125 (stephen.silliman @ umb.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Robert McGhee (2008) recently argued against the validity and viability of Indigenous archaeology based on claims that untenable “Aboriginalism” supports the entire enterprise. However, he mischaracterizes and simplifies Indigenous archaeology, despite the wealth of literature suggesting that such community approaches have had and will continue to have great value for method, theory, rigorous interpretation, and political value in archaeology.

Resumen

Resumen

Robert McGhee (2008) se ha manifestado recientemente en contra de la validez y viabilidad de la arqueología indígena alegando que el “aboriginalismo” inalcanzable sostiene toda la empresa. Sin embargo, él malinterpreta y simplifica la arqueología indígena a pesar de que la vasta literatura sobre el tema señala el gran valor que dicho acercamiento comunitario ha tenido y continua teniendo para el método, la teoría, la interpretación rigurosa y la importancia política de la arqueología.

Type
Forum
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , April 2010 , pp. 217 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Atalay, Sonya, guest editor 2006 Special Issue: Decolonizing Archaeology. American Indian Quarterly 30 (3&4).Google Scholar
Barrera, Jorge 2008 First Nation Olympian Calls for Pound to Resign over ‘Savages’ Remark. The Montreal Gazette, October 19. Electronic document, http://www.canada.com/montreal-gazette/news/story.html?id=b86e0f53-70d2-47b2-alle-f7951d0a8ebe&k=28068, accessed November 14, 2008.Google Scholar
Colwell-Chanthaphonh, Chip, and Ferguson, T. J. (editors) 2007 Collaboration in Archaeological Practice: Engaging Descendant Communities. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
Dowdall, Katherine M., and Parrish, Otis O. 2002 A Meaningful Disturbance of the Earth. Journal of Social Archaeology 3(1):99–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, T. J., and Colwell-Chanthaphonh, Chip 2006 History is in the Land: Multivocal Tribal Traditions in Arizona’s San Pedro Valley. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Grande, Sandy 2000 American Indian Identity and Intellectualism: The Quest for a New Red Pedagogy. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 13:343–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerber, Jordan E. (editor) 2006 Cross-Cultural Collaboration: Native Peoples and Archaeology in the Northeastern United States. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
McGhee, Robert 2008 Aboriginalism and the Problem of Indigenous Archaeology. American Antiquity 73:579–597.Google Scholar
Nicholas, George P. 1997 Education and Empowerment: Archaeology with, for, and by the Shuswap Nation, British Columbia. In At a Crossroads: Archaeology and First Peoples in Canada, edited by George P. Nicholas and Thomas D. Andrews, pp. 85–104. Simon Fraser University Archaeology Press, Burnaby, British Columbia.Google Scholar
Nicholas, George P. 2008 Native Peoples and Archaeology. In Encyclopedia of Archaeology, Volume 3, edited by Deborah M. Pearsall, pp. 1660–1669. Elsevier, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Nicholas, George P., and Andrews, Thomas D. 1997 Indigenous Archaeology in the Post-Modern World. In At a Crossroads: Archaeology and First Peoples in Canada, edited by George P. Nichoas and Thomas D. Andrews, pp. 1–18. Archaeology Press, Burnaby, B.C.Google Scholar
Peck, Trevor, Siegfried, Evelyn, and Oetalaar, Gerald A. (editors) 2003 Indigenous People and Archaeology: Honouring the Past, Discussing the Present, Building for the Future. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Chacmool Conference. Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary, Calgary.Google Scholar
Silliman, Stephen W. 2008 The “Old West” in the Middle East: U.S. Military Metaphors in Real and Imagined Indian Country. American Anthropologist 110:237–247.Google Scholar
Silliman, Stephen W. (editor) 2008 Collaborating at the Trowel’s Edge: Teaching and Learning in Indigenous Archaeology. Amerind Studies in Archaeology #2. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Smith, Claire, and Martin Wobst, H. (editors) 2005 Indigenous Archaeologies: Decolonizing Theory and Practice. Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
Watkins, Joe E. 2000 Indigenous Archaeology: American Indian Values and Scientific Practice. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
Watkins, Joe E. 2003 Archaeological Ethics and American Indians. In Ethical Issues in Archaeology, edited by Larry J. Zimmerman, Karen D. Vitelli, and Julie Hollowell-Zimmer, pp. 129–141. AltaMira, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Larry J. 2003 Sharing Control of the Past. In Archaeological Ethics, Second Edition, edited by Karen D. Vitelli and Chip Colwell-Chanthaphonh, pp. 170–175. AltaMira, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar