Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:59:49.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation in Ohio Hopewell Political Economies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Matthew S. Coon
Matthew S. Coon*
Affiliation:
Indiana Department of Transportation, Office of Environmental Services, Cultural Resources Section, Indianapolis, IN 46204
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I examine mortuary, artifactual, symbolic, and proxemic data from Hopewell sites in southwestern and south-central Ohio to suggest that people associated with south-central Ohio sites such as Hopewell and Seip implemented more exclusionary political strategies, while people at southwestern sites such as Turner and Fort Ancient maintained a more corporate orientation through much of the Middle Woodland period. The recognition of this dimension of variation among Ohio Hopewell peoples has important implications for the study of the evolution of middle-range societies.

Résumé

Résumé

Por medio del análisis de múltiples líneas de evidencia encontrados en sitios de Hopewell al sudoeste y al surcentral de Ohio, propongo que los habitantes de sitos como Hopewell y Seip utilizaban estrategias políticas exclusionarias mientras que los habitantes de sitos tales como Turner y Fort Ancient mantuvieron una estrategia política corporativa durante la mayor parte del periodo Middle Woodland. El reconocimiento de esta variación entre los antiguos habitantes de Hopewell en Ohio tiene implicaciones importantes para el estudio de la evolución de estas sociedades de medio rango.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 74 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 49 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Baby, Raymond S., and Langlois, Suzanne M. 1979 Seip Mound Sate Memorial: Nonmortuary Aspects of Hopewell. In Hopewell Archaeology: The Chillicothe Conference, edited by David S. Brose and N’omi Greber, pp. 16–18. Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio.Google Scholar
Baldia, Christel M. 2005 Development of a Protocol to Detect and Classify Colorants in Archaeological Textiles and its Application to Selected Prehistoric Textiles from Seip Mound in Ohio. Ph.D. dissertation, College of Human Ecology, The OhioState University. Electronic document, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osul122567876. OhioLlNK ETD. Accessed July 28,2008.Google Scholar
Baldia, Christel M., and Jakes, Kathryn D. 2007 Photographic Methods to Detect Colourants in Archaeological Textiles. Journal of Archaeological Science 34:519–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldia, Christel M., Jakes, Kathryn D., and Baldia, Maximilian O. 2008 Coloration and Fabric Structure of Selected Polychrome Textiles from the Seip Mound Group. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 33(2), in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Glenn A. 1934 Archaeological Survey of Dearborn and Ohio Counties. Indiana History Bulletin 11(7):171–260.Google Scholar
Blanton, Richard E. 1998 Beyond Centralization: Steps Toward a Theory of Egalitarian Behavior in Archaic States. In Archaic States, edited by Gary M. Feinman and Joyce Marcus, pp. 135–172. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Blanton, Richard E., and Taylor, Jody 1995 Patterns of Exchange and the Social Reproduction of Pigs in Highland New Guinea: Their Relevance to Questions about the Origins and Evolution of Agriculture. Journal of Archaeological Research 3:113–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanton, Richard E., Feinman, Gary M., Kowalewski, Stephen A., and Peregrine, Peter N. 1996a A Dual-Processual Theory for the Evolution of Mesoamerican Civilization. Current Anthropology 37:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanton, Richard E., Feinman, Gary M., Kowalewski, Stephen A., and Peregrine, Peter N. 1996b Reply. Current Anthropology 37:65–68.Google Scholar
Blosser, Jack and Glotzhober, Robert C. 1993 Fort Ancient: Citadel, Cemetery, Cathedral, or Calendar? Ohio Historical Society, Columbus.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, Elizabeth M., and Earle, Timothy K. 1987 Specialization, Exchange, and Complex Societies: An Introduction. In Specialization, Exchange, and Complex Societies, edited by Elizabeth M. Brumfiel and Timothy K. Earle, pp. 1–9. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Byers, A. Martin 2004 The Ohio Hopewell Episode. University of Akron Press, Akron.Google Scholar
Carr, Christopher 2006 The Tripartite Ceremonial Alliance among Scioto Hopewellian Communities and the Question of Social Ranking. In Gathering Hopewell: Society, Ritual, and Ritual Interaction, edited by Christopher Carr and D. Troy Case, pp. 258–338. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Carr, Christopher, and Troy Case, D. 2006 The Nature of Leadership in Ohio Hopewellian Societies. In Gathering Hopewell: Society, Ritual, and Ritual Interaction, edited by Christopher Carr and D. Troy Case, pp. 177–237. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Carr, Christopher, and Komorowski, Jean-Christophe 1995 Identifying the Mineralogy of Rock Temper in Ceramics Using X-Radiography. American Antiquity 60:723–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Christopher and Maslowski, Robert F. 1995 Cordage and Fabrics: Relating Form, Technology, and Social Processes. In Style, Society, and Person: Archaeological and Ethnological Perspectives, edited by Christopher Carr and Jill E. Neitzel, pp. 297–343. Plenum, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, Flora 1983 An Analysis of Textile Fragments from Three Ohio Hopewell Sites. Ohio Archaeologist 33(1):10–16.Google Scholar
Church, Flora 1984 Textiles as Markers of Ohio Hopewell Social Identities. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 9:1–25.Google Scholar
Connolly, Robert P. 2004 The Evolution of Fort Ancient Embankment Wall Form. In The Fort Ancient Earthworks: Prehistoric Life-ways of the Hopewell Culture in Southwestern Ohio, edited by Robert P. Connolly and Bradley T. Lepper, pp. 35–50. Ohio Historical Society, Columbus.Google Scholar
Coon, Matthew S. 2008 The Oberting Site (12D25): An Ohio Hopewell Enclosure in Indiana. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Purdue University, West Lafayette. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Cowan, C. Wesley 1996 Social Implications of Ohio Hopewell Art. In A View from the Core: A Synthesis of Ohio Hopewell Archaeology, edited by Paul J. Pacheco, pp. 128–148. Ohio Archaeological Council, Columbus.Google Scholar
Cowan, Frank L. 2006 A Mobile Hopewell? Questioning Assumptions of Ohio Hopewell Sedentism. In Recreating Hopewell, edited by Douglas K Charles and Jane E. Buikstra, pp. 26–49. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Cowan, Frank L., and Greber, N’omi B. 2002 Hopewell Mound 11: Yet Another Look at an Old Collection. Hopewell Archeology 5(2):7–11.Google Scholar
Cowan, Frank L., Sunderhaus, Ted S., and Genheimer, Robert A. 2004 Earthwork Peripheries: Probing the Margins of the Fort Ancient Site. In The Fort Ancient Earthworks: Prehistoric Lifeways of the Hopewell Culture in Southwestern Ohio, edited by Robert P. Connolly and Bradley T. Lepper, pp. 107–124. Ohio Historical Society, Columbus.Google Scholar
Cox, Edward T. 1879 Antiquities. In Eighth, Ninth and Tenth Annual Reports of the Geological Survey of Indiana, edited by Edward T. Cox, pp. 121–137. Indianapolis Journal Company, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
DeBoer, Warren 1997 Ceremonial Centers from the Cayapas to Chillicothe. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 7:225–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBoer, Warren 2004 Little Bighorn on the Scioto: The Rocky Mountain Connection to Ohio Hopewell. American Antiquity 69:85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietler, Michael 2001 Theorizing the Feast: Rituals of Consumption, Commensal Politics, and Power in African Contexts. In Feasts: Archaeological and Ethnographic Perspectives on Food, Politics, and Power, edited by Michael Dietler and Brian Hayden, pp. 65–114. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.Google Scholar
Dietler, Michael and Herbich, Ingrid 2001 Feasts and Labor Mobilization: Dissecting a Fundamental Economic Practice. In Feasts: Archaeological and Ethnographic Perspectives on Food, Politics, and Power, edited by Michael Dietler and Brian Hayden, pp. 240–264. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.Google Scholar
Essenpreis, Patricia S., and Moseley, Michael E. 1984 Fort Ancient: Citadel or Coliseum. Field Museum of Natural History Bulletin 55:5–10, 20–26.Google Scholar
Fargher, Lane F., and Blanton, Richard E. 2007 Revenue, Voice, and Public Goods in Three Pre-Modern Societies. Comparative Studies in Society and History 49:848–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinman, Gary M. 2000 Dual-Processual Theory and Social Formations in the Southwest. In Alternative Leadership Strategies in the Pre-hispanic Southwest, edited by Barbara J. Mills, pp. 207–224. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Feinman, Gary M., Lightfoot, Kent G., and Upham, Steadman 2000 Political Hierarchies and Organizational Strategies in the Puebloan Southwest. American Antiquity 65:449–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, James G. 1989 Hierarchy in Simple ‘Egalitarian℉ Societies. Annual Review of Anthropology 18:245–266 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greber, N’omi 1976 Within Ohio Hopewell: Analyses of Burial Patterns from Several Classic Sites. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Greber, N’omi 1979a Variations in Social Structure of Ohio Hopewell Peoples. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 4:35–78.Google Scholar
Greber, N’omi 1979b A Comparative Study of Site Morphology and Burial Patterns at Edwin Harness Mound and Seip Mounds 1 and 2. In Hopewell Archaeology: The Chillicothe Conference, edited by N’omi Greber and David S. Brose, pp. 27–38. Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio.Google Scholar
Greber, N’omi 1983 Recent Excavations at the Edwin Harness Mound, Liberty Works, Ross County, Ohio. Mid-Continental Journal of Archaeology Special Publication 5. Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio.Google Scholar
Greber, N’omi 1996 A Commentary on the Contexts and Contents of Large to Small Ohio Hopewell Deposits. In A View from the Core: A Synthesis of Ohio Hopewell Archaeology, edited by Paul J. Pacheco, pp. 150–172. Ohio Archaeological Council, Columbus.Google Scholar
Greber, N’omi 1997 Two Geometric Enclosures in the Paint Creek Valley: An Estimate of Possible Changes in Community Patterns through Time. In Ohio Hopewell Community Organization, edited by William S. Dancey and Paul J. Pacheco, pp. 207–229. Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio.Google Scholar
Greber, N’omi 2003 Chronological Relationships among Ohio Hopewell Sites: Few Dates and Much Complexity. In Theory, Method, and Practice in Modern Archaeology, edited by Robert J. Jeske and Douglas K. Charles, pp. 88–113. Praeger, Westport, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Greber, N’omi, and Ruhl, Katharine C. 2001 The Hopewell Site: A Contemporary Analysis Based on the Work of Charles C. Willoughby. Eastern National, Ft. Washington, Pennsylvania. Originally printed 1989, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Griffin, James B. 1965 Hopewell and the Dark Black Glass. Michigan Archaeologist 11:115–155.Google Scholar
Griffin, James B. 1967 Eastern North American Archaeology: A Summary. Science 156(3772): 175–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harkness, Barbara M. 1982 Implications for Ohio Hopewell Polity Suggested by Lithic and lconographic Analysis. Ph.D. dissertation, The Union for Experimenting Colleges and Universities. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Hatch, James W., Michaels, Joseph W., Stevenson, Christopher M., Scheetz, Barry, and Geidel, Richard 1990 Hopewellian Obsidian Studies: Behavioral Implications of Recent Sourcing and Dating Research. American Antiquity 55:461–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Rebecca A. 1996 Revising the Ohio Middle Woodland Ceramic Typology: New Information from the Twin Mounds West Site. In A View from the Core: A Synthesis of Ohio Hopewell Archaeology, edited by Paul J. Pacheco, pp. 70–91. Ohio Archaeological Council, Columbus.Google Scholar
Helms, Mary W. 1979 Ancient Panama: Chiefs in Search of Power. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Helms, Mary W. 1988 Ulysses’ Sail. Princeton University Press, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helms, Mary W. 1992 Long-Distance Contacts, Elite Aspirations, and the Age of Discovery in Cosmological Context. In Resources, Power, and Interregional Interaction, edited by Edward M. Schortman and Patricia A. Urban, pp. 157–174. Plenum, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinkle, Kathleen Ann 1984 Ohio Hopewell Textiles: A Medium for the Exchange of Social and Stylistic Information. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.Google Scholar
Hughes, Richard 1992 Another Look at Hopewellian Obsidian Studies. American Antiquity 57:515–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junker, Laura Lee 2001 The Evolution of Ritual Feasting Systems in Prehispanic Philippine Chiefdoms. In Feasts: Archaeological and Ethnographic Perspectives on Food, Politics, and Power, edited by Michael Dietler and Brian Hayden, pp. 267–310. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.Google Scholar
Kime, Julie 1986 Fragment of the Past: The Ater Mound Blanket. Time-line 2(4):48–51.Google Scholar
Kuttruff, Jenna Tedrick 1993 Mississippian Period Status Differentiation through Textile Analysis: A Caddoan Example. American Antiquity 58:125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazazzera, Adrienne J. 2004 Hopewell Household Variation at the Fort Ancient Site. In The Fort Ancient Earthworks: Prehistoric Lifeways of the Hopewell Culture in Southwestern Ohio, edited by Robert P. Connolly and Bradley T. Lepper, pp. 84–106. Ohio Historical Society, Columbus.Google Scholar
Levi-Strauss, Claude 1967 Do Dual Organizations Exist? In Structural Anthropology, translated by Claire Jacobson and Brooke Grund-fest Schoepf, pp. 128–160. Doubleday, New York.Google Scholar
Lynott, Mark J. 1995 Research News. Hopewell Archeology 1(2).Google Scholar
Mainfort, Robert C. Jr., and Sullivan, Lynne P. 1998 Explaining Earthen Enclosures. In Ancient Earthen Enclosures of the Eastern Woodlands, edited by Robert C. Mainfort and Lynne P. Sullivan, pp. 1–16. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Mills, Barbara J. 2000 Alternative Models, Alternative Strategies: Leadership in the Prehispanic Southwest. In Alternative Leadership Strategies in the Prehispanic Southwest, edited by Barbara J. Mills, pp. 3–18. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Mills, William C. 1900 Report of Field Work. Ohio Archaeological and Historical Quarterly 8:309–344.Google Scholar
Mills, William C. 1909 Explorations of the Seip Mound. Ohio Archaeological and Historical Quarterly 18:268–321.Google Scholar
Mills, William C. 1922 Exploration of the Mound City Group. Ohio Archaeological and Historical Quarterly 31:423–584.Google Scholar
Moorehead, Warren K. 1890 Fort Ancient: The Great Prehistoric Earthwork of Warren County, Ohio. Robert Clarke, Cincinnati.Google Scholar
Moorehead, Warren K. 1896 A Description of Fort Ancient. Ohio Archaeological and Historical Quarterly 4:362–377.Google Scholar
Moorehead, Warren K. 1922 The Hopewell Mound Group of Ohio. Anthropological Series 6(5). Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Richard G. 1970 Fort Ancient. Ohio Historical Society, Columbus.Google Scholar
Otto, Martha Potter 2004 A Brief History of Archaeological Investigations at Fort Ancient, Warren County, Ohio. In The Fort Ancient Earthworks: Prehistoric Lifeways of the Hopewell Culture in Southwestern Ohio, edited by Robert P. Connolly and Bradley T. Lepper, pp. 3–13. Ohio Historical Society, Columbus.Google Scholar
Pacheco, Paul J. 1996 Ohio Hopewell Regional Settlement Patterns. In A View from the Core: A Synthesis of Ohio Hopewell Archaeology, edited by Paul J. Pacheco, pp. 16–35. Ohio Archaeological Council, Columbus.Google Scholar
Peregrine, Peter N. 1991 Some Political Aspects of Craft Specialization. World Archaeology 23:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peregrine, Peter N. 1992 Mississippian Evolution: A World-System Perspective. Prehistory Press, Madison.Google Scholar
Peregrine, Peter N. 2001 Matrilocality, Corporate Strategy, and the Organization of Production in the Chacoan World. American Antiquity 66:26–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickard, William H. 1996 1990 Excavations at Capitolium Mound (33WN13), Marietta, Washington County, Ohio: A Working Evaluation. In A View from the Core: A Synthesis of Ohio Hopewell Archaeology, edited by Paul J. Pacheco, pp. 274–285. Ohio Archaeological Council, Columbus.Google Scholar
Potter, Martha A. and Thomas, Edward S. 1970 Fort Hill. Ohio Historical Society, Columbus.Google Scholar
Prufer, Olaf H. 1964 The Hopewell Cult. Scientific American 211(6):90–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prufer, Olaf H. 1968 Ohio Hopewell Ceramics: An Analysis of the Extant Collections. Anthropological Papers 33. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, Colin 1985 The Archaeology of Cult: The Sanctuaryat Phylakopi. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Romain, William 1996 Hilltop enclosures: Were they the dwelling places of underworld monsters? Ohio Archaeologist 46(2):36–44.Google Scholar
Romain, William 2004 Journey to the Center of the World: Astronomy, Geometry, and Cosmology of the Fort Ancient Enclosure. In The Fort Ancient Earthworks: Prehistoric Lifeways of the Hopewell Culture in Southwestern Ohio, edited by Robert P. Connolly and Bradley T. Lepper, pp. 66–83. Ohio Historical Society, Columbus.Google Scholar
Ruby, Bret J., Carr, Christopher, and Charles, Douglas K. 2006 Community Organizations in the Scioto, Mann, and Havana Hopewellian Regions. In Gathering Hopewell: Society, Ritual, and Ritual Interaction, edited by Christopher Carr and D. Troy Case, pp. 119–176. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Ruhl, Katharine C. 1992 Copper Earspools from Ohio Hopewell Sites. Mid-continental Journal of Archaeology 17:46–49.Google Scholar
Ruhl, Katharine C. 2006 Hopewellian Copper Earspools from Eastern North America: The Social, Ritual, and Symbolic Significance of Their Contexts and Distribution. In Gathering Hopewell: Society, Ritual, and Ritual Interaction, edited by Christopher Carr and D. Troy Case, pp. 696–733. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Ruhl, Katharine C., and Seeman, Mark F. 1998 The Temporal and Social Implications of Ohio Hopewell Copper Earspool Design. American Antiquity 63:651–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeman, Mark F. 1979 Feasting with the Dead: Ohio Hopewell Charnel House Ritual as a Context for Redistribution. In Hopewell Archaeology: The Chillicothe Conference, edited by N’omi Greber and David S. Brose, pp. 39–46. Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio.Google Scholar
Shetrone, Henry C. 1926 Explorations of the Hopewell Group of Prehistoric Earthworks. Ohio Archaeological and Historical Quarterly 35:1–227.Google Scholar
Shetrone, Henry C. 1930 The Mound-Builders. D. Appleton, New York.Google Scholar
Shetrone, Henry C., and Greenman, Emerson F. 1931 Explorations of the Seip Group of Prehistoric Earth-works. Ohio Archaeological and Historical Quarterly 40:349–510.Google Scholar
Sieg, Lauren, and Sunderhaus, Ted 2004 The Fort Ancient Middle Woodland Ceramic Assemblage. In The Fort Ancient Earthworks: Prehistoric Life-ways of the Hopewell Culture in Southwestern Ohio, edited by Robert P. Connolly and Bradley T. Lepper, pp. 147–166. Ohio Historical Society, Columbus.Google Scholar
Song, Cheunsoon Ahn 1991 Variations in Fiber Morphology of Prehistoric Textiles from the Seip Group of Mounds: A Model for Explanation. Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Song, Cheunsoon A., Jakes, Kathryn A., and Yerkes, Richard W. 1996 Seip Hopewell Textile Analysis and Cultural Implications. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 21:247–265.Google Scholar
Spielmann, Katherine 1998 Ritual Craft Specialists in Small-Scale Societies. In Craft and Social Identity, edited by Cathy Costin and Rita Wright, pp. 153–159. Archaeological Publications of the American Anthropological Association 8, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Spielmann, Katherine 2002 Feasting, Craft Specialization, and the Ritual Mode of Production. American Anthropologist 104:195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squier, Ephraim G., and Davis, Edwin H. 1998 [1848] Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley, edited by David J. Meltzer. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Steiner, Christopher B. 1990 Body Personal and Body Politic: Adornment and Leadership in Cross-Cultural Perspective. Anthropos 85:431–445.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Christopher M., Abdelrehim, Ihab, and Novak, Steven W. 2004 High Precision Measurement of Obsidian Hydration Layers on Artifacts from the Hopewell Site Using Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry. American Antiquity 69:555–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Amanda J. 2003 Textiles as Indicators of Hopewellian Culture Burial Practices. Ph.D. dissertation, College of Human Ecology, The Ohio State University. Electronic document, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view7acc_nuirposul054507830. Accessed October 29, 2007.Google Scholar
Turff, Gina M. and Carr, Christopher 2006 Hopewellian Panpipes from Eastern North America. In Gathering Hopewell: Society, Ritual, and Ritual Interaction, edited by Christopher Carr and D. Troy Case, pp. 648–695. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Tuzin, Donald F. 2001 Social Complexity in the Making: A Case Study among the Arapesh of New Guinea. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
Whittlesey, Charles 1852 Descriptions of Ancient Works in Ohio. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge 3(7). Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Willey, Gordon R., and Phillips, Philip 1944 Negative-Painted Pottery from Crystal River, Florida. American Antiquity 10:173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willoughby, Charles C. 1922 The Turner Group of Earthworks, Hamilton County, Ohio. Papers 3(3). Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Willoughby, Charles C. 1935 Michabo the Great Hare: A Patron of the Hopewell Mound Settlement. American Anthropologist 37:280–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willoughby, Charles C. 1938 Textile Fabrics from the Burial Mounds of the Great Earthwork Builders of Ohio. Ohio Archaeological and Historical Quarterly 47:273–287.Google Scholar
Wimberley, Virginia S. 2004 Preserved Textiles on Hopewell Copper. In Perishable Material Culture in the Northeast, edited by Penelope Ballard Drooker, pp. 69–85. New York State Museum Bulletin 500. University of the State of New York, State Education Department, Albany.Google Scholar
Wobst, H. Martin 1977 Stylistic Behavior and Information Exchange. In For the Director: Essays in Honor of James B. Griffin, edited by Charles Cleland, pp. 317–342. Anthropological Papers No. 61. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Wright, Gary A. 1990 On the Interior Attached Ditch Enclosures of the Middle and Upper Ohio Valley. Ethnos 55:92–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar