Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:27:28.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Criminal Law's Nemesis: Drug Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Symposium: Current Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1985 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Trebach, Arnold S., The Heroin Solution (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1982); John Kaplan, The Hardest Drug: Heroin and Public Policy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983); Mark H. Moore, Review Essay, Regulating Heroin: Kaplan and Trebach on the Dilemmas of Public Policy (reviewing those volumes), 1984 A.B.F. Res. J. 722.Google Scholar

2 Ball, John C., Two Patterns of Narcotic Drug Addiction in the United States, 56 J. Crim. L., Criminology, & Police Sci. 203 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Blumstein, Alfred, Cohen, Jacqueline, & Miller, Harold D., Crime, Punishment, and Demographics, 2 Am. Demographics 32 (1980); Felson, Marcus & Gottfredson, Michael, Social Indicators of Adolescent Activities Near Peers and Parents, 46 J. Marriage & Fam. 709 (1984).Google Scholar

4 Jan M. Chaiken & Marcia M. Chaiken, Crime Rates and the Active Criminal, in James Q. Wilson, ed., Crime and Public Policy (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1983).Google Scholar

5 National Narcotics Intelligence Consumers Committee, Narcotics Intelligence Estimate, 1983, at 35 (Washington, D.C.: Drug Enforcement Administration, 1984).Google Scholar

6 Hulsman, Louk H. C., Holland: Liberalisierung um welchen Preis? (Liberalization at What Price?), 8 Drogalkohol 66 (1984); id., Heroine, Criminaliteit en Sociale Reacties (Heroin, Criminality and Social Reactions), 26 Tijdschrift voor Criminologie 73 (1984); Sebastian Scheerer, The New Dutch and German Drug Laws: Social and Political Conditions for Criminalization and Decriminalization, 12 Law & Soc'y Rev. 585 (1978).Google Scholar

7 Bruno, Francesco, ed., Combatting Drug Abuse and Related Crime, pub. no. 21, at 177 (Rome: United Nations Social Defence Research Institute, 1984).Google Scholar

8 National Institute on Drug Abuse, Main Findings for Drug Abuse Treatment Units, Sept. 1982, Statistical Series F, no. 10, table 2.01 (Rockville, Md.: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1983).Google Scholar

9 Durkheim, Emile, The Division of Labor in Society, trans. W. D. Halls (New York: Free Press, 1984).Google Scholar

10 Parsons, Talcott, The Evolution of Societies (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1977).Google Scholar

11 Heer, David M., Felson, Marcus, & Hodge, Robert W., The Cluttered Nest: Evidence That Young Adults are More Likely to Live at Home Now Than in the Recent Past, 69 Soc. & Soc. Research 436 (1985).Google Scholar

12 Johnston, Lloyd D., Patrick M. O'Malley, & Jerald G. Bachman, Highlights from Drugs and American High School Students, 1975–1983 (Rockville, Md.: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1984); id., University of Michigan Survey Research Center, news release (Jan. 4, 1985); and id., tables from the 1984 NIDA survey (unpublished and supplied to this reviewer).Google Scholar

13 America's Fitness Binge, U.S. News & World Rep., May 3, 1982, at 58.Google Scholar

14 J. Michael Polich et al., Strategies for Controlling Adolescent Drug Use (Santa Monica, Cal.: Rand, 1984); Gilbert J. Botvin, Prevention of Adolescent Substance Abuse Through the Development of Personal and Social Competence, in Thomas J. Glynn et al., eds., Preventing Adolescent Drug Abuse: Intervention Strategies, Research Monograph No. 47 (Rockville, Md.: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1983).Google Scholar