No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 December 2018
1. New York: Oxford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
2. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Co., 1978.Google Scholar
3. Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A (1966 & Cum. Supp. 1978).Google Scholar
4. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co., 248 N.Y. 339, 162 N.E. 99 (1928).Google Scholar
5. 13 Stan. L. Rev. 779 (1961).Google Scholar
6. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co., 24 Cal. 2d 453, 461, 150 P.2d 436, 440 (1944) (Traynor, J., concurring).Google Scholar
7. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc., 59 Cal. 2d 57, 377 P.2d 897, 27 Cal. Rptr. 697 (1962).Google Scholar
8. MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 217 N.Y. 382, 111 N.E. 1050 (1916).Google Scholar
9. White makes only passing reference to “compensation” as his preferred method of dealing with “routine” cases in the future (p. 235).Google Scholar
10. 26 Cal. 3d 588, 607 P.2d 924, 163 Cal. Rptr. 132 (1980).Google Scholar
11. P. xii.Google Scholar
12. 60 Mass. (6 Cush.) 292 (1850).Google Scholar
13. 53 N.H. 442 (1873).Google Scholar
14. 51 N.Y. 476 (1873).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Cf. Steven F. Williams's review of The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860, by Morton Horwitz (1977), in 25 U.C.L.A.L. Rev. 1187 (1978).Google Scholar