Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:04:08.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Harold J. Spaeth's Rebuttal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1980 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. See text of review at pp. 618–19.Google Scholar

2. Id. at pp. 619–20.Google Scholar

3. Harold J. Spaeth & David J. Peterson, The Analysis and Interpretation of Dimensionality: The Case of Civil Liberties Decision Making, 15 Midwest J. Political Sci. 415 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. David W. Rohde & Harold J. Spaeth, Supreme Court Decision Making (San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Co., 1976).Google Scholar

5. Block writes, “Indeed, Spaeth's new book adds nothing to the decision model described in his 1976 Supreme Court Decision Making.” See text of review at p. 619.Google Scholar

6. See text of review at p. 625.Google Scholar

7. See note 5 of review.Google Scholar

8. Rohde & Spaeth, supra note 4, at 96 nn.19, 20.Google Scholar

9. Tanenhaus, Joseph, The Cumulative Scaling of Judicial Decisions, 79 Harv. L. Rev. 1583 (1966).Google Scholar

10. Spaeth, Harold J., Unidimensionality and Item Invariance in Judicial Scaling, 10 Behavioral Sci. 290 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11. See text of review at pp. 620–21.Google Scholar

12. Spaeth, Harold J., Supreme Court Policy Making: Explanation and Prediction 153 (San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Co., 1979).Google Scholar

14. Rohde & Spaeth, supra note 4, at 157–68.Google Scholar

15. Spaeth & Peterson, supra note 3, at 438–41.Google Scholar

16. See text of review at pp. 624–26.Google Scholar

17. Spaeth, supra note 12, at 137.Google Scholar

18. Id. at 124.Google Scholar

19. See text of review at p. 625.Google Scholar