Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:41:21.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

James Eisenstein, Counsel for the United States: U.S. Attorneys in the Political and Legal Systems. Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978. Pp. 264 + appendixes.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Donald M. McIntyre
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
American Bar Foundation Research Journal , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , Winter 1980 , pp. 149 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1980 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Jackson, Robert H., The Federal Prosecutor, 31 J. Am. Inst. Crim. L. & Criminology 3, 6 (1941).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Whitney North Seymour, Jr., United States Attorney (New York: William Morrow, 1975).Google Scholar

3 Peter M. Blau & W. Richard Scott, Formal Organizations: A Comparative Approach (San Francisco: Chandler Pub. Co., 1962).Google Scholar

4 Corwin, Ronald G., Patterns of Organizational Conflict, 14 Ad. Science Q. 507 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5 Jones, Frank E., Structural Determinants of Consensus and Cohesion in Complex Organizations, 5 Canadian Rev. Soc. & Anthropology 219 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Cardozo, Benjamin N., A Ministry of Justice, 35 Haw. L. Rev. 113, 123 (1922).Google Scholar

7 United States Department of Justice, Annual Report of the Attorney General: 1976, at 4 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1976).Google Scholar

8 National Association of Attorneys General, The Office of Attorney General 117 (1971). see also Mclntyre, Donald M., Administrative Authority, Discretion and Control, in National Association of Attorneys General, Committee on the Office of Attorney General, Summary of Proceedings—Management Institute ([Raleigh, N.C.]: National Association of Attorneys General, Nov. 1971).Google Scholar

9 United States Department of Justice, Annual Report of the Attorney General: 1977, at 95–96 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1977).Google Scholar

10 California, Criminal Justice Profile, 1977, at 84 (Sacramento: State of California, 1978).Google Scholar