Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:19:07.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agricultural use of organic amendments: A historical perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

James F. Parr  and
Sharon B. Hornick
James F. Parr
Affiliation:
Research Soil Scientists, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD 20705.
Sharon B. Hornick
Affiliation:
Research Soil Scientists, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD 20705.
Get access

Abstract

Agricultural research conducted in the United States since establishment of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture and Land-Grant University System in 1862 has shown that regular and proper additions of organic materials are very important for maintaining the tilth, fertility, and productivity of agricultural soils, protecting them from wind and water erosion, and preventing nutrient losses by runoff and leaching. Several millennia earlier, Roman agriculturists were advocating crop rotations, green manuring, composts, legumes, farmyard manures, crop residues, wood ashes, seaweed, and sewage wastes for supplying humus and nutrients to restore or enhance soil productivity. Even earlier, Asian farmers also used these practices to maintain healthy and productive soils. Today the most serious problem in U.S. agriculture and agriculture worldwide is the widespread degradation of agricultural soils through erosion and the consequential decline in productivity. In view of how much information is available on the benefits of organic recycling on agricultural lands, one wonders why we aren't doing a better job of protecting and conserving our land resource base. We discuss strategies for using organic resources more effectively to achieve a more sustainable agriculture for the future.

Keywords

early agriculturesoil organic mattererosionsoil qualitybest management practicesmunicipal solid wastesewage sludgecomposting
Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 181 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Allison, F.E. 1973. Sou Organic Matter and Its Role in Crop Production. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
2.Brosten, D. 1988. How much can we lose? Agrichemical Age 32(10):7–8. HBJ Farm Publications, Inc., San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
3.Brown, L.R., and Wolf, B.C.. 1984. Soil Erosion: Quiet Crisis in the World Economy. Worldwatch Paper No. 60. WorldWatch Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
4.Chaney, R.L. 1990a. Twenty years of land application research. BioCycle 31(9):55–59.Google Scholar
5.Chaney, R.L. 1990b. Public health and sludge utilization. BioCycle 31(10): 68–73.Google Scholar
6.Fussell, G.E. 1965. Farming Technique from Prehistoric to Modern Times. Pergamon Press, London, England.Google Scholar
7.Gibbons, B., and Wilson, S.C.. 1984. Do we treat our soil like dirt? National Geographic 166(3):350–389.Google Scholar
8.Hornick, S.B., Sikora, L.J., Sterrett, S.B., Murray, J.J., Millner, P.D., Burge, W.D., Colacicco, D., Parr, J.F., Chaney, R.L., and Willson, G.B.. 1984. Utilization of sewage sludge compost as a soil conditioner and fertilizer for plant growth. Agric. Information Bull. No. 464. U.S. Dept. of Agric. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
9.Hornick, S.B., and Parr, J.F.. 1987. Restoring the productivity of marginal soils with organic amendments. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 2(2):64–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.King, F.H. 1911. Farmers of Forty Centuries: Permanent Agriculture in China, Korea, and Japan. Reissued by Rodale Press, Emmaus, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
11.Leonard, J.N. 1973. The Emergence of Man: The First Farmers. Time-Life Books, New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
12.Lowdermilk, W.C. 1953. Conquest of the land through 7000 years. Agric. Information Bull. No. 99. U.S. Dept. of Agric. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
13.MacKay, A.I. 1950. Farming and Gardening in the Bible. Rodale Press, Emmaus, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
14.National Research Council. 1989. Alternative Agriculture. Board on Agriculture. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
15.Parr, J.F., and Colacicco, D.. 1987. Organic materials as alternative nutrient sources. In Helsel, Z.R. (ed). Energy in Plant Nutrition and Pest Control. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 81–99.Google Scholar
16.Parr, J.F., and Hornick, S.B.. 1992. Utilization of municipal wastes. In Metting, B. (ed). Soil Microbial Ecology: Applications in Agriculture, Forestry and Environmental Management. Marcel Dekker, New York, N.Y. pp. 545–559.Google Scholar
17.Parr, J.F., Stewart, B.A., Hornick, S.B., and Singh, R.P.. 1990. Improving the sustainability of dryland farming systems: A global perspective. Advances in Soil Sci. 13:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Parr, J.F., Papendick, R.I., Hornick, S.B., and Meyer, R.E.. 1992. Soil quality: Attributes and relationship to alternative and sustainable agriculture. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 7:5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Power, J.F., and Pollett, R.F.. 1987. Monoculture. Scientific American 255(3):79–86.Google Scholar
20.Reganold, J.P., Papendick, R.I., and Parr, J.F.. 1990. Sustainable agriculture. Scientific American 262(6): 112–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Smith, G.E. 1942. Sanborn Field: Fifty years of field experiments with crop rotations, manure, and fertilizers. Missouri Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. No. 458. Univ. of Missouri, Columbia.Google Scholar
22.Soil Science Society of America. 1984. Glossary of Soil Science Terms. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
23.U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. 1957. Soil. Yearbook of Agriculture. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
24.U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. 1978. Improving Soils With Organic Wastes. Report to the Congress in response to Section 1461 of the Food and Agriculture Act of 1977 (PL 95–113). U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
25.U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. 1980. Report and Recommendations on Organic Farming. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
26.U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. 1988. Low-Input/Sustainable Agriculture: Research and Education Program. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
27.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1989a. EPA's policy promoting the beneficial use of sewage sludge; and the new proposed technical sludge regulations. Office of Municipal Pollution Control, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
28.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1989b. The Solid Waste Dilemma: An Agenda for Action. EPA/530-SW-89-019. Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
29.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1990a. National sewage sludge survey: Availability of information and data, and anticipated impacts on proposed regulations; Proposed rule. Federal Register 55(218):47210–47283.Google Scholar
30.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1990b. Characterization of Municipal Waste in the United States: 1990 Update. Executive summary. EPA/530-SW-90-042A. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
31.White, K.D. 1970. Roman Farming. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
32.Willson, G.B., Parr, J.F., Epstein, E., Marsh, P.B., Chaney, R.L., Colacicco, D., Burge, W.D., Sikora, L.J., Tester, C.F., and Hornick, S.B.. 1980. Manual for Composting Sewage Sludge by the Beltsville Aerated Pile Method. EPA-600/8-80-022. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar