Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:19:06.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors in organic farmers' decisionmaking: Diversity, challenge, and obstacles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Leslie A. Duram
Leslie A. Duram
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, EL 62901-4514; duram@siu.edu.
Get access

Abstract

This research promotes our understanding of organic farmers' decisionmaking through individual farmers' experiences. A twofold survey was conducted to investigate characteristics of certified organic farmers in Colorado. Data from a mail survey (26 responses to 49 surveys sent) reveal patterns of farm operations and attitudes among this group of farmers. These questionnaires focused on land use, land tenure, operational change, and personal characteristics. In-depth interviews of five case study farmers provide additional insight into farmers' agricultural decisionmaking. These interviews were conversations that the farmers guided toward topics of relevance to them. Taken together, the mail and interview surveys provided information about on-farm operational factors and personal characteristics. Quantitative analysis and qualitative data reduction techniques were used to identify factors in organic farmer decisionmaking. The following eight factors help us understand organic agriculture in this region: diversity, challenge, change, businesslike approach, no formal agricultural education, love of the land, anti-”radical environmentalist,” and obstacles.

Keywords

organic agricultureoperational changebehavior
Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 1999 , pp. 2 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Allen, P., and Sachs, C.. 1993. Sustainable agriculture in the United States: Engagements, silences, and possibilities for transformation. In Allen, P. (ed.). Food for the Future: Conditions and Contradictions of Sustainability. John Wiley, New York, NY. p. 139–167.Google Scholar
2.Altieri, M. 1995. Agroecology: The Science of Sustainable Agriculture. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
3.Batte, M.L., Forster, D., and Hitzhusen, F.. 1993. Organic agriculture in Ohio: An economic perspective. J. Production Agric. 6:536–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Benbrook, C. 1995. Healthy Food, Healthy Farms: Pest Management in the Public Interest. National Campaign for Pesticide Policy Reform, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
5.Beus, C., and Dunlap, R.. 1992. The alternative-conventional agricultural debate: Where do agricultural faculty stand? Rural Sociology 57:363–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Buttel, F., and Gillespie, G.. 1988. Preferences for crop production practices among conventional and alternative farmers. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 3:11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Bureau of the Census. 1992. Census of Agriculture. Vol. 1: State and County Data. Part 6: Colorado. U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
8.COPA. 1993. Marketing Directory. Colorado Organic Producers Association, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
9.Danbom, D.B. 1991. Romantic agrarianism in twentieth-century America. Agric. History 65:1–12.Google Scholar
10.Dunn, J. 1995. Organic food and fiber: An analysis of 1994 certified production in the United States. Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
11.Duram, L. 1997. A pragmatic study of conventional and alternative farmers in Colorado. The Professional Geographer 49:202–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Duram, L. 1998. Organic agriculture in the US: Current status and future regulation. Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues 2:34–38.Google Scholar
13.Jacobson, M., Lefferts, L., and Garland, A.. 1991. Safe Food: Eating Wisely in a Risky World. Center for Science in the Public Interest. Living Planet Press, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
14.Jolly, D., and Norris, K.. 1991. Marketing prospects for organic and pesticide-free produce. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 6:174–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Korsching, P., and Hoban, T.. 1990. Relationships between information sources and farmers' conservation perceptions and behavior. Society and Natural Resources 3:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Lockeretz, W. 1997. Diversity of personal and enterprise characteristics among organic growers in the northeastern United States. Biological Agric. and Horticulture 14:13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Lockeretz, W., and Madden, P. 1987. Midwestern organic farming: A tenyear follow-up. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 2:57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Lockeretz, W., Shearer, G., Klepper, R., and Sweeney, S.. 1978. Field crop production on organic farms in the midwest. J. Soil and Water Conservation 33:130–134.Google Scholar
19.Lockeretz, W., Shearer, G., and Kohl, D.. 1981. Organic farming in the corn belt. Science 211:540–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Merchant, C. 1992. Radical Ecology: The Search for a Livable World. Routledge, New York, NY.Google Scholar
21.Miles, M., and Huberman, A.M.. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
22.Natural Foods Merchandiser. 1997. Organic Sales. New Hope Communications, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
23.Padgitt, S., and Petrzelka, P.. 1994. Making sustainable agriculture the new conventional agriculture: Social change and sustainability. In Hatfield, J. and Karlen, D. (eds.). Sustainable Agricultural Systems. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL. p. 261–285.Google Scholar
24.Salamon, S., Farnsworth, R., Bullock, D., and Yusuf, R.. 1997. Family factors affecting adoption of sustainable farming systems. J. Soil and Water Conservation 52:265–271.Google Scholar
25.Smolik, J., and Dobbs, T.. 1991. Crop yields and economic returns accompanying the transition to alternative farming systems. J. Production Agric. 4:153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Smolik, J., Dobbs, T., and Rickerl, D.. 1995. The relative sustainability of alternative, conventional, and reducedtill farming systems. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 10:25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Stanhill, G. 1990. The comparative productivity of organic agriculture. Agric, Ecosystems and Environment 30:1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Swanson, L., Camboni, S., and Napier, T.. 1986. Barriers to adoption of soil conservation practices on farms. In Lovejoy, S. and Napier, T. (eds.). Conserving Soil: Insights from Socioeconomic Research. Soil Conservation Society of America, Ankeny, IA. p. 21–132.Google Scholar
29.U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. 1994. National Organic Standards Board: Final recommendations for organic crop production standards. Adopted June 1–4. USDA/AMS/TMD, Washington, DC.Google Scholar