Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:39:53.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growing out of the niche – can organic agriculture keep its promises? A study of two Austrian cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Rebecka Milestad*
Affiliation:
Research School of Ecological Land Use, Department of Rural Development Studies, Box 7005, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Sonja Hadatsch
Affiliation:
Ecologist, was formerly at the Institute of Organic Farming, Austrian University of Agricultural Sciences, Gregor Mendelstr. 33, 1180 Vienna, Austria.
*
Rebecka Milestad (rebecka.milestad@ lbutv.slu.se).
Get access

Abstract

The expansion of organic farming has taken off in the European Union and particularly in Austria, where 9% of farmland is certified organic. The main reasons for this development are subsidies and cooperation with supermarket chains. In Austria, many organic farms are located in the mountainous areas, while lowlands with arable cropping have fewer organic farms than the national average. Exploring two regions as case studies, this paper investigates whether the organic farming movement can keep its promises of environmental safety, economic viability and social justice. There is a high level of environmental concern among those who practice organic farming, but local differences are large. It is the individual farmer who determines whether environmental issues beyond the official organic regulations are considered. The economic situation for organic farms is positive due to the financial support from the government and cooperation with supermarket chains, but processing and marketing operations are still lacking for organic products. Regarding social justice, organic farming enjoys a high esteem among consumers, but relations and cooperation between organic and conventional farm sectors is poor. We conclude that it is crucial for the organic movement to focus on qualitative issues rather than quantitative expansion for further sound development of organic farming in Austria.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Her current address is Lindengasse 3, 1070 Vienna, Austria.

References

Allen, P., and Kovach, M.. 2000. The capitalist composition of organic: The potential of markets in fulfilling the promise of organic agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 17:221232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahner, T. 2000. Bürgernetze statt Subventionen. ABL Bauernblatt, Rheda-Wi, Germany.Google Scholar
Bartel, A., Darnhofer, I., Eder, M., Freyer, B., Hadatsch, S., Lindenthal, T., Milestad, R., Muhar, A., Payer, H., Penker, M., Rützler, H., Schneeberger, W., Velimirov, A., and Waltzer, A.. 2002. Flächendeckende Umstellung auf biologischen Landbau: Integrative Akzeptanz- und Wirkungsanalyse anhand ausgewählter Untersuchungsregionen. Final Report. Austrian Landscape Research Program, BMBWK, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Bätzing, W. 1991. Die Alpen. Entstehung und Gefährdung einer europäischen Kulturlandschaft. Verlag C.H. Beck, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
Bätzing, W. 1997. Kleines Alpen-Lexikon. Umwelt. Wirtschaft. Kultur. Verlag C.H. Beck, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
Bio Ernte. 2001. Produktionsrichtlinien für den organischbiologischen Landbau in Österreich. July 2001. Available at Web site http://www.bio-ernte.at/pdf_und_bilder/ernte-richtlinien_10-02.pdf (verified 09 2002).Google Scholar
BMLFUW. 2000. ÖPUL 2000. Sonderrichtlinie für das Österreische Programm zur Förderung einer umweltgerechten, extensiven und den natürlichen Lebensraum schützenden Landwirtschaft. ZI. 25.014/37-II/B8/00, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
BMLFUW. 2001a. Organic Farming in Austria. Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Environment and Water Management, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
BMLFUW. 2001b. Endbericht ÖPUL 95 und ÖPUL 98 - Bericht 2001. Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Environment and Water Management, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
BMLFUW. 2001c. Aktionsprogramm biologische Landwirtschaft des Bundesministeriums für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft für die Jahre 2001 und 2002. Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Environment and Water Management, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Browne, A.W., Harris, P.J.C., Hofny-Collins, A.H., Pasiecznik, N., and Wallace, R.R.. 2000. Organic production and ethical trade: definition, practice and links. Food Policy 25:6989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, D., Getz, C., and Guthman, J.. 1997. From farm to table: The organic vegetable commodity chain of Northern California. Sociologia Ruralis 37:320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conford, P. 2001. The Origins of the Organic Movement. Floris Books, Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
DeLind, L. 2000. Transforming organic agriculture into industrial organic products: Reconsidering national organic standards. Human Organization 59:198208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denzin, N., and Lincoln, Y.. 2000. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
Drake, L., and Björklund, J.. 2001. Effekter av olika sätt alt jämföra livsmedel - en inventering av jämförelser mellan ekologisk och konventionell production. CUL publication series. Available at Web site http://www.cul.slu.se/publik/effekteravlivsm.pdf (verified 09 2002).Google Scholar
Eder, M., Schneeberger, W., and Gernig, H.. 2001. Anteil der Biobetriebe steigt mit der Erschwernis. Blick ins Land 6/2001 :3436.Google Scholar
Freyer, B., Eder, M., Darnhofer, I., Kirner, L., Lindenthal, T., Schneeberger, W., and Zollitsch, W.. 2001. Der biologische Landbau in Österreich - Entwicklungen und Perspektiven. Agrarwirtschaft 50(7):400409.Google Scholar
Friedel, J.K., Dierenbach, E., and Gabel, D.. 1997. Öko-äcker sind umsatzaktiver und können Stickstoff effizienter speichern. Ökologie und Landbau 25(3): 1415.Google Scholar
Froschauer, U., and Lueger, M.. 1992. Das Qualitative Interview zur Analyse sozialer Systeme. WUV Universitätsverlag, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Gigler, G. 2001. Stickstoff - Phosphor - und Kalium - Hoftorbilanzen von biologisch und konventionell wirtschaftenden Betrieben in den NUTS III Regionen Liezen und Weinviertel. Masters Thesis, Institute of Organic Farming, Austrian Agricultural University, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Groier, M. 1998. Entwicklung und Bedeutung des biologischen Landbaus in Österreich im internationalen Kontext. Facts and Features 19, Bundesanstalt für Bergbauernfragen, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Groier, M. 1999. Agrarische Umweltpolitik und biologische Landbau in Österreich und Europa. In Kritische Geographie (ÖGKG) Landwirtschaft und Agrarpolitik in den 90er Jahren: Österreich zwischen Tradition und Moderne. Promedia, Vienna, Austria, p. 148166.Google Scholar
Hadatsch, S., Kratochvil, R., Vabitsch, A., Freyer, B., and GÖtz, B.. 2000. Biologische Landwirtschaft im Marchfeld. Potentiale zur Entlastung des Natur- und Landschaftshaushaltes. Monographien Band 127. Federal Environment Agency, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Hall, A., and Mogyorody, V.. 2001. Organic farmers in Ontario: An examination of the conventionalization argument. Sociologia Ruralis 41:399422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, B., Alröe, H. Fjelsted, and Kristensen, E.S.. 1999. Environmental impacts from organic farming. Contribution at Session 1: Environmental effects of organic agriculture. Environmental impacts on water, air, soil, biodiversity, landscape systems; organic agriculture as part of environmental strategies; integrated measures. EU Conference 05 27, 1999.Google Scholar
IFOAM. 2002. Final Draft 2002. Basic standards for organic production and processing. Available at Web site http://www.ifoam.org/standard/ibs_final02.html (verified 09 2002).Google Scholar
Kinsella, J., Wilson, S., de Jong, F., and Renting, H.. 2000. Pluriactivity as a livelihood strategy in Irish farm households and its role in rural development. Sociologia Ruralis 40:479496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirner, L., and Schneeberger, W.. 1999a. Vergleich der Struktur der Betriebe mit biologischer Wirtschaftsweise und Verzicht auf bestimmte ertragssteigernde Betriebsmittel im österreichischen Umweltprogramm. Die Bodenkultur 50(2): 133142.Google Scholar
Kirner, L., and Schneeberger, W.. 1999b. Hemmnisse für die Umstellung auf biologischer Wirtschaftsweise in Österreich. Analyse einer Befragung von Betrieben mit Verzicht auf bestimmte ertragssteigernde Betriebsmittel. Die Bodenkultur 50(4):227234.Google Scholar
Kirner, L., and Schneeberger, W.. 2002. Österreich: Weniger Biobetriebe, mehr Bioabsatz. Ökologie und Landbau 121 (1):3335.Google Scholar
Kirner, L., Eder, M., and Schneeberger, W.. 2002. Strukturelle Merkmale der Biobetriebe 2000 in Österreich - Vergleich zu den konventionellen Betrieben im Invekos und der Agrarstrukturerhebung, Ländlicher Raum 1/2002. Available at Web site http://www.laendlicher-raum.at (verified Sep. 2002).Google Scholar
Kvale, S. 1996. An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
Lampkin, N. 1990. Organic Farming. Farming Press Books, Ipswich UK.Google Scholar
Lampkin, N. 2002. Development of policies for organic agriculture. Proceedings of the COR Conference, March 26–28, 2002. UK Organic Research 2002, Aberystwyth, UK. p. 321324.Google Scholar
Lampkin, N., Foster, C., and Padel, S.. 1999. The Policy and Regulatory Environment for Organic Farming in Europe: Country Reports. Organic Farming in Europe: Economics and Policy, Vol. 2. Universität Hohenheim, Hohenheim, Germany.Google Scholar
Le Guillou, G., and Scharp, A.é. 2000. Organic Farming. Guide to Community Rules. European Commission Directorate-General for Agriculture. European Communities, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Lindenthal, T., Müller, W., Hess, J., Plakolm, G., and Hartl, W.. 1993. Forschung im biologischen Landbau - Eine Bestandsaufnahme im deutschsprachigen Raum unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Österreich. Monographien 36. Federal Environment Agency, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Loseries-Leick, A. 2000. Sölkspuren I. Eine Kulturgeschichtliche Dokumentation des Naturparkes Sölktäler. Naturschutzbund Steiermark und Verein Naturpark Sölktäler, Stein an der Enns, Austria.Google Scholar
Lyson, T.A., and Green, J.. 1999. The agricultural marketscape: A framework for sustaining agriculture and communities in the Northeast. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 15(2/3): 133150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackinnon, N., Bryden, J.M., Bell, C., Fuller, A.M., and Spearman, M.. 1991. Pluriactivity, structural change and farm household vulnerability in Western Europe. Sociologia Ruralis 31:5871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mäder, P., Fliessbach, A., Dubois, D., Gunst, L., Fried, P., and Niggli, U.. 2002. Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science 296:16941697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michelsen, J., Hamm, U., Wynen, E., and Roth, E.. 1999. The European Market for Organic Products: Growth and Development. Organic Farming in Europe: Economics and Policy, Vol. 7. Universität Hohenheim, Hohenheim, Germany.Google Scholar
Michelsen, J., Lynggaard, K., Padel, S., and Foster, C.. 2001. Organic Farming Development and Agricultural Institutions in Europe: A Study of Six Countries. Organic Fanning in Europe: Economics and Policy, Vol. 9. Universität Hohenheim, Hohenheim, Germany.Google Scholar
Miles, M.B., and Huberman, A.M.. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publications, London, UK.Google Scholar
Milestad, R., and Darnhofer, I.. 2003. Building farm resilience: The prospects and challenges of organic farming. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 22(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, C., Hopkins, A., and Winter, M.. 2001. Comparison of the social, economic and environmental effects of organic, ICM and conventional farming. The Countryside and Community Research Unit and The Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar
Pugliese, P. 2001. Organic farming and sustainable rural development: a multifaceted and promising convergence. Sociologia Ruralis 41(1):113130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiller, L. 2000. Das Vegetationsmosaik von biologisch und konventionell bewirtschafteten Acker- und Grünlandflächen in verschiedenen Naturräumen Süddeutschlands. Cramer, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
Schneeberger, W., Lacovara, M. A. L., and Eder, M.. 2002a. Bio oder konventionell: Welche Betriebe erwirtschaften ein höheres Einkommen? Blick ins Land 4:3637.Google Scholar
Schneeberger, W., Darnhofer, I., and Eder, M.. 2002b. Barriers to the adoption of organic farming by cash-crop producers in Austria. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 17(1):2431.Google Scholar
Statistik Austria. 2001. Agrarstrukturerhebung 1999: Gesamtergebnisse. Statistik Austria, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Stolze, M., Piorr, A., Härling, A., and Dabbert, S.. 2000. Environmental Impacts of Organic Farming in Europe. Organic Farming in Europe: Economics and Policy, Vol. 6. University of Hohenheim, Hohenheim, Germany.Google Scholar
Tilman, D., Cassman, K.G., Matson, P.A., Naylor, R., and Polasky, S.. 2002. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tovey, H. 1997. Food, environmentalism and rural sociology: On the organic farming movement in Ireland. Sociologia Ruralis 37:2137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogl, C.R., and Hess, J.. 1999. Organic farming in Austria. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 14:137143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, G. 2000. Origins, development, and future challenges of organic farming. Proceedings 13th IFOAM Scientific Conference, Basel, Switzerland. p. 708711.Google Scholar
Woese, K., Lange, D., Boess, C., and ögl, K.W.B.. 1997. A comparison of organically and conventionally grown foods - results of a review of the relevant literature. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 74:281293.3.0.CO;2-Z>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, R.K. 1994. Case Study Research. Design and Methods. Sage Publications, London, UK.Google Scholar