Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:50:27.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanical and cultural weed control in corn and soybeans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Jeffrey L. Gunsolus
Jeffrey L. Gunsolus
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.
Get access

Abstract

Many farmers and consumers are reevaluating chemical weed control because of the environmental risks of herbicides and their influence on farm size and diversity. This paper reviews research of the last 35 years on mechanical and cultural weed control in corn (Zea mays L.) and soybeans (Glycine max L.). Soybeans can better use the weed control advantages of late planting and narrow row spacing and are less affected by early stand losses from mechanical weed control. In Minnesota, delaying planting to early June allows early germinating weeds to be controlled by preplant tillage but reduces the maximum yield potential of corn by approximately 25 percent and soybeans by approximately 10 percent. Narrow rows allow the crop canopy to close earlier, preventing emerging weeds from developing. However, in a nonchemical weed control system, the row spacing should allow for inter-row cultivation to control weeds that emerge with the crop. Up to a 10 percent reduction in crop stand may be expected in fields that have been rotary hoed. In Minnesota, a 10 percent stand loss results in a 2 percent loss of corn yield potential and no loss of soybean yield potential. Successful mechanical weed control is directly related to the timeliness of the operation. Rotary hoeing is effective on weeds that have germinated but not yet emerged but not on weeds that germinate from deeper than 5 cm, on no-till fields, or on fields with more than 20 to 30 percent crop residue. Inter-row cultivation is most effective on weeds up to 10 to 15 cm tall. Successful nonchemical weed control requires highly refined management skills and is as much an art as a science.

Keywords

mechanical weed controlcultural weed controlcornsoybeansplanting daterow spacingcrop rotationcrop stand losstimeliness
Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , September 1990 , pp. 114 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bender, J. 1986. Get the most from your rotary hoe. The New Farm. March/April:23, 25–27.Google Scholar
2.Burnside, O. C., and Colville, W. L.. 1964. Soybean and weed yields as affected by irrigation, row spacing, tillage, and amiben. Weeds 12:109–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Chepil, W. S. 1946. Germination of weed seeds I. Longevity, periodicity of germination, and vitality of seeds in cultivated soil. Scientific Agriculture 26:307–346.Google Scholar
4.Doll, J., Doersch, R., Paulson, W., and Mulder, T.. 1990. Effectiveness of substituting cultivation for herbicides. Proceedings of the Fertilizer, Ag Lime and Pest Management Conference 29:244–252.Google Scholar
5.Fawcett, R. S., and Slife, F. W.. 1978. Effects of field applications of nitrate on weed seed germination and dormancy. Weed Science 26:594–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Fernholz, C. 1990. How I control weeds with-out herbicides. The New Farm. March/April: 17–20.Google Scholar
7.Granatstein, D. 1988. Sustainable farming: Making the transition. In Reshaping the Bottom Line: On-Farm Strategies for a Sustainable Agriculture. Land Stewardship Project, Stillwater, Minnesota, p. 6.Google Scholar
8.Hardman, L. L., Orf, J. H., Rehm, G. W., and Stienstra, W. C.. 1988. Tips for profitable soybean production. University of Minnesota Extension Service, AG-FO-2899.Google Scholar
9.Hicks, D. R. 1979. Corn replanting: Is it necessary? University of Minnesota Agricultural Extension Service Crop News No. 46.Google Scholar
10.Hicks, D. R., Otto, H. J., and Hasbargen, P. H.. 1970. Row width for corn and soybeans. University of Minnesota Extension Service, FSAG-16.Google Scholar
11.Johnson, M. D., Wyse, D. L., and Lueschen, W. E.. 1989. The influence of herbicide formulation on weed control in four tillage systems. Weed Science 37:239–249.Google Scholar
12.Liebman, M., and Janke, R. R.. 1990. Sustainable weed management practices. In Francis, C., Flora, C. B., and King, L. D. (eds.). Sustainable Agriculture in Temperate Zones. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, New York. pp. 111–143.Google Scholar
13.Lovely, W. G., Weber, C. R., Staniforth, D. W.. 1958. Effectiveness of the rotary hoe for weed control in soybeans. Agronomy Journal 50:621–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Lueschen, W. E., and Gunsolus, J. L.. 1989. Effects of cultivation on corn weed control. University of Minnesota Southern Experiment Station Research Report, pp. 55–59.Google Scholar
15.MacHoughton, J. 1973. Ecological Changes in Weed Populations as a Result of Crop Rotations and Herbicides. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana.Google Scholar
16.Peters, E. J., Gebhardt, M. R., and Stritzke, J. F.. 1965. Interrelations of row spacings, cultivations and herbicides for weed control in soybeans. Weeds 13:285–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Peters, E. J., Klingman, D. L., and Larson, R. E.. 1959. Rotary hoeing in combination with herbicides and other cultivations for weed control in soybeans. Weeds 7:449–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Robinson, R. G., and Dunham, R. S.. 1956. Pre-planting tillage for weed control in soybeans. Agronomy Journal 48:493–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Siemens, J. C., and McGlamery, M. D.. 1985. Effect of cultivation on central Illinois corn and soybean yields. Crops and Soils 37:13–16.Google Scholar
20.Slife, F. W., and Wax, L. M.. 1976. Weed and herbicide management. In Hill, L. D. (ed.). World Soybean Research. Interstate Printer & Publ., Inc., Danville, Illinois, pp. 397–403.Google Scholar
21.Springman, R., Buhler, D., Schuler, R., Mueller, D., and Doll, J.. 1989. Row crop cultivators for conservation tillage systems. University of Wisconsin Extension A3483.Google Scholar
22.Stoller, E. W., and Wax, L. M.. 1973. Periodicity of germination and emergence of some annual weeds. Weed Science 21:574–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Swanson, C. L. W., and Jacobson, H. G. M.. 1953. Herbicides: A new tool for use in studying soil physical properties affecting crop growth. Weeds 1:174–184.Google Scholar
24.Walker, R. H., and Buchanan, G. A.. 1982. Crop manipulation in integrated weed management systems. Weed Science 30 (Suppl. 1):17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Wax, L. M., and Pendleton, J. W.. 1968. Effect of row spacing on weed control in soybeans. Weeds 16:462–464.Google Scholar