Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:08:19.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Small-scale, intensive cultivation methods: The effects of deep hand tillage on the productivity of bush beans and red beets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Ben F. Holt
Affiliation:
Graduate student, Ohio University, Department of Environmental and Plant Biology, Athens, OH 45701.
Ivan K. Smith
Affiliation:
Professor, Ohio University, Department of Environmental and Plant Biology, Athens, OH 45701.
Get access

Abstract

This study examined how one aspect of intensive cultivation, double digging by hand (loosening the planting bed to 50 cm deep), contributed to crop productivity and nutrient uptake in bush beans (1994 and 1995) and red beets (1995 only). Comparison beds were prepared with the soil cultivated to 25 cm (single dig) and 6 cm (surface cultivation). Although there were significant differences (1994 beans) between the surface cultivated beds and other cultivation types for leaf mass and chlorophyll content, there were no significant differences in the total mass of beans (whole fruit) produced. There were no significant differences in beet green or root (edible portion) biomass among cultivation methods. Levels of Ca, Mg, and K in the bean fruits and beet roots were not significantly different among cultivation methods. This study demonstrated that deep cultivation significantly alters the soil profile as measured by penetrometer resistance, but that this change does not necessarily alter productivity or nutrient uptake. We suggest that deep hand tillage has little effect on crop productivity in well-watered and moderate to high fertility soils. These results are similar to those found in mechanically subsoiled systems.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Barber, R.G., and Diaz, O.. 1992. Effects of deep tillage and fertilization on soya yields in a compacted Ustchrept during seven cropping seasons, Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Soil Tillage Res. 22:371381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Barber, R.G., and Navarro, F.. 1994. The rehabilitation of degraded soils in Eastern Bolivia by subsoiling and the incorporation of cover crops. Land Degradation and Rehabilitation 5:247259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Bennie, A.T.P., and Botha, F.J.P.. 1986. Effects of deep tillage and controlled traffic on root growth, wateruse efficiency and yield of irrigated maize and wheat. Soil Tillage Res. 7:8595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Corbett, A. 1994. Double-digging it. Bio-intensive gardening: big yield in a small space. The Washington Post. January 24.Google Scholar
5.Dawkins, T.C.K., McGowan, M., Hebblethwaite, P.D., and Brereton, J.C.. 1984. The effect of thorough subsoil loosening on the yield of peas (1980) and subsequent crop of winter wheat (1981). R. and D. in Agric. 1:5357.Google Scholar
6.El-Karouri, M.O.H., and Gooderham, P.T.. 1977. The effect of soil physical conditions and nitrogen fertilizer on the yield of Italian ryegrass. J. Agric. Sci. (Cambridge) 88:743751.Google Scholar
7.Fisher, N.M., Gooderham, P.T., and Ingram, J.. 1975. The effects on the yields of barley and kale of soil conditions induced by cultivation at high moisture content. J. Agric. Sci. (Cambridge) 85:385393.Google Scholar
8.Greenwood, P.B., and Cameron, K.C.. 1990. Subsoiling research in North Otago and Canterbury: an overview. In Home, D.J. and Furkert, I.F.H. (eds). Proc. Fifth National Land Drainage Seminar. Massey Univ., Palmerston North, New Zealand, pp. 3859.Google Scholar
9.Harrison, D.F., Cameron, K.C., and McLaren, R.G.. 1994. Effects of subsoil loosening on soil physical properties, plant root growth, and pasture yield. New Zealand J. Agric. Res. 37:559567.Google Scholar
10.Harrison, H. 1991. Alternatives in intensive gardening. Country Small Stock J. 75:9.Google Scholar
11.Hendershot, W.H., Lalande, H., and Duquette, M.. 1993a. Ion exchange and exchangeable cations. In Carter, M.R. (ed). Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Canadian Soc. Soil Sci., Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 167176.Google Scholar
12.Hendershot, W.H., Lalande, H., and Duquette, M.. 1993b. Soil reaction and exchangeable acidity. In Carter, M.R. (ed). Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Canadian Society of Soil Sci., Boca Raton, Florida. pp. 141145.Google Scholar
13.Inskeep, W.P., and Bloom, P.R.. 1985. Extinction coefficients of chlorophyll a and b in N, N-dimethylformamide and 80% acetone. Plant Physiology 77:483485.Google Scholar
14.Jeavons, J. 1991. How to Grow More Vegetables. Ten Speed Press, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
15.Johnston, A.E., and Warren, R.G.. 1964. Improving soil structure at Woburn. Rothamsted Report for 1963. pp. 3941.Google Scholar
16.Karam, A. 1993. Chemical properties of organic soils. In Carter, M.R. (ed). Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Canadian Soc. Soil Sci., Boca Raton, Florida. pp. 459471.Google Scholar
17.Karlen, D.L., Wollenhaupt, N.C., Erbach, D.C., Berry, E.C., Swan, J.B., Eash, N.S., and Jordahl, J.L.. 1994. Longterm tillage effects on soil quality. Soil Tillage Res. 32:313327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Lipiec, J., and Stepniewski, W.. 1995. Effects of soil compaction and tillage systems on uptake and losses of nutrients. Soil Tillage Res. 35:3752.Google Scholar
19.MacFadyen, J.T. 1985. The call to dig. Horticulture 63:3847.Google Scholar
20.Marks, M.J., and Soane, G.C.. 1987. Crop and soil response to subsoil loosening, deep incorporation of phosphorus and potassium fertilizer and subsequent soil management on a range of soil types. Part 1: Response of arable crops. Soil Use Management 3:115121.Google Scholar
21.McEwen, J., and Johnston, A.E.. 1979. The effects of subsoiling and deep incorporationof P and K fertilizers on the yield and nutrient uptake of barley, wheat and sugar beet. J. Agric. Sci. (Cambridge) 92:695702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Moran, R. 1982. Formulae for determination of chlorophyllous pigments extracted with N, N-dimethylformamide. Plant Physiology 69:13761381.Google Scholar
23.Ouwerkerk, C.V., and Raats, P.A.C.. 1986. Experiences with deep tillage in the Netherlands. Soil Tillage Res. 7:273283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Ross, C.W. 1986. The effect of subsoiling and irrigation on potato production. Soil Tillage Res. 7:315325.Google Scholar
25.Russell, E.W. 1956. The effects of very deep ploughing and of subsoiling on crop yields. J. Agric. Sci. (Cambridge) 48:129144.Google Scholar
26.Schmidt, C.P., and Belford, R.K.. 1994. Increasing the depth of soil disturbance increases yields of direct drilled wheat on the sandplain soils of Western Australia. Australian J. Experimental Agric. 34:777781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Smith, L.A. 1995. Cotton response to deep tillage with controlled traffic on clay. Trans. Amer. Soc. Agric. Engin. 38:4550.Google Scholar
28.Soane, G.C., Goodwin, R.J., Marks, M.J., and Spoor, G.. 1987. Crop and soil response to subsoil loosening, deep incorporation of phosphorus and potassium fertilizer and subsequent soil management on a range of soil types. Part 2: Soil structural conditions. Soil Use Management 3:123130.Google Scholar
29.Stone, D.A. 1982. The effects of subsoil loosening and deep incorporation of nutrients on yield of broad beans, cabbage, leek, potatoes, and red beet. J. Agric. Sci. (Cambridge) 98:297306.Google Scholar
30.Stone, P. 1990. John Jeavons: Digging up the future. Mother Earth News:4551.Google Scholar
31.Swain, R.W. 1975. Subsoiling. In Soil Physical Conditions and Crop Production. MAFF Technical Bulletin, Vol. 29. HMSO, London, England. pp. 189204.Google Scholar
32.Tonge, P. 1987. Feeding the world. The Christian Science Monitor. October 16.Google Scholar
33.Vepraskas, M.J., Busscher, W.J., and Edwards, J.H.. 1995. Residual effects of deep tillage vs. no-till on corn root growth and grain yield. J. Production Agric. 8:401405.Google Scholar