Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:36:33.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sustainable agriculture: The wildlife connection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Ann Y. Robinson
Affiliation:
Agricultural Specialist, Izaak Walton League of America, 801 Commerce Drive, Decorah, IA 52101.
Get access

Abstract

Wildlife and fish have much to gain from the movement toward alternative, sustainable agricultural practices. Interrelated reasons for the habitat improvements to be expected from a change to sustainable systems include reduced use of agricultural chemicals, better care of the soil, and reintroduction of greater landscape diversity. The most well-documented benefits would result from reduced use of agrichemicals, which often are toxic and frequently change the structure and composition of available food and cover. The wildlife benefits of erosion prevention and landscape diversification are less well-documented but may be as significant for habitat improvement. The opportunities to enhance habitat using sustainable farming methods are beginning to receive increased attention from wildlife professionals. As a result, efforts are under way to expand use of sustainable methods on farmlands managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Agricultural Law and Policy Institute. 1988. Farming and groundwater: An introduction. Issues Booklet No. 1. Minneapolis, Minnesota.Google Scholar
2.Albers, P. H. 1978. The effects of petroleum on different stages of incubation in bird eggs. Bulletin of Environmental Contaminants Toxicology 19:624630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Anderson, E. W., Franzen, D. L., and Melland, J. E.. 1990. RX grazing to benefit watershed-wildlife-livestock. Rangelands 12(2):105111.Google Scholar
4.Appropriate Technology Transfer for Rural Areas. 1990. ATTRAnews 1(1):14.Google Scholar
5.Appropriate Technology Transfer for Rural Areas. 1991. Wildlife meetings renew managers' interest in SA. ATTRAnews 1(3):1.Google Scholar
6.Balcomb, R. 1983. Secondary poisoning of redshouldered hawks with carbofuran. Journal of Wildlife Management 47(4):11291132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Balcomb, R. 1984. Toxicity of 16 granular insecticides to wild-caught songbirds. Bulletin of Environmental Contaminants Toxicology 33:302307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Bareiss, L. J., Schulz, P., and Guthery, F. S.. 1986. Effects of short-duration and continuous grazing on bob-white and wild turkey nesting. Journal of Range Management 39(3):259260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Barker, R. J., and Waller, G. D.. 1978. Sublethal effects of parathion, methyl parathion, or formulated methoprene fed to colonies of honey bees. Environmental Entomology 7(4):569571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Barker, W. T., Sedivec, K. K., Messmer, T. A., Higgins, K. F., and Hertel, D. R.. 1990. Effects of specialized grazing systems on waterfowl production in southcentral North Dakota. In McCabe, R. (ed.). Trans. North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conf. 55:462474.Google Scholar
11.Bennett, R. S., Bennett, J. K., Meyers, S. M., Marden, B., and Fairbrother, A.. 1990. Effects of organophosphorus compounds on avian reproductive success. In Environmental Contaminants and Their Effects on Biota of the Northern Plains, Proc. North Dakota Wildlife Society symposium, Bismarck, North Dakota.Google Scholar
12.Benson, D., Baker, C. D., Forsyth, B. J., and Castrale, J. S.. 1985. Herbicide (alachlor, atrazine, linuron and paraquat) residues in deer mice inhabiting conventional and minimum tillage row-crop fields. Indiana Academy of Science 94:373380.Google Scholar
13.Berkman, H. E., and Rabeni, C. F.. 1987. Effect of siltation on stream fish communities. Environmental Biology of Fishes 18(4):285294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Best, L. B. 1986. Conservation tillage: Ecological traps for nesting birds? Wildlife Society Bulletin 11:333347.Google Scholar
15.Best, L. B. 1990. Sustaining wildlife in agroecosystems. Leopold Letter 2(4):47. Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
16.Blus, L. J., Staley, C. S., Henny, C. J., Pendleton, G. W., Craig, T. H., Craig, E. H., and Halford, D. K.. 1989. Effects of organophosphorus insecticides on sage grouse in southeastern Idaho. Journal of Wildlife Management 53(4):11391146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Brewer, L. W., Driver, C. J., Kendall, R. J., Zenier, C., and Lacher, T. E.. 1988. Effects of methyl parathion in ducks and duck broods. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 7:375379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Brewer, R. A. 1989. Disulfoton hazards to fish and wildlife: A synoptic review. Research Report, Institute of Wildlife and Environmental Toxicology, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina.Google Scholar
19.Bryan, G., and Pease, J.. 1990. Agricultural pesticides and wildlife: A balancing act. Pamphlet, Iowa State University Extension, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
20.Buhl, K. J., and Faerber, N. L.. 1990. Acute toxicity of selected herbicides and surfactants to larvae of the midge Chironomus riparius. In Environmental Contaminants and Their Effects on Biota of the Northern Plains, Proc. North Dakota Wildlife Society symposium, Bismarck, North Dakota.Google Scholar
21.Cacek, T. 1984. Organic farming: The other conservation farming system. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 39(6):357360.Google Scholar
22.Capel, P. D. 1990. Atmospheric deposition of herbicides in the mid-continental United States. EOS 17:1329.Google Scholar
23.Castrale, J. S. 1987. Pesticide use in no-till row-crop fields relative to wildlife. Indiana Academy of Science 96:215222.Google Scholar
24.Clark, E. H., Haverkamp, J. A., and Chapman, W.. 1985. Eroding Soils: The Off-Farm Impacts. The Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
25.Conover, M. 1987 Surface water quality impacts on aquatic systems in Iowa. In Dahlgren, R. B. and Klaas, E. E. (eds.). Proc. Management Alternatives for Biological Farming Workshop III.Iowa State University,Ames, Iowa. pp. 56–60.Google Scholar
26.Cox, R. L., and Wilson, W. T.. 1984. Effects of Permethrin on the behavior of individually tagged honey bees, Apis millifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Environmental Entomology 13(2):375378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Dahlgren, R. B. 1967. The pheasant decline. South Dakota Dept. of Game, Fish and Parks, Pierre, South Dakota.Google Scholar
28.Dahlgren, R. B. 1984. Alternative Agriculture Systems: benefits to fish and wildlife resources. In Proc. Institute for Alternative Agriculture First Annual Scientific Symposium. Washington, DC. pp. 711.Google Scholar
29.DeSoto National Wildlife Refuge. 1989. Narrative report. Missouri Valley, Iowa.Google Scholar
30.DeSoto National Wildlife Refuge. 1990. Narrative report. Missouri Valley, Iowa.Google Scholar
31.Ducey, J., Rauscher, J., Wiederspan, C., Miller, L., Koehler, A., and Mazour, D.. 1980. A biological comparison of organic and chemical farming. National Academy of Science student paper. Dept. of Forestry, Fisheries and Wildlife, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska.Google Scholar
32.Duffy, M. D. 1991. Energy use and production practices on Iowa farms, 1989. Departmental paper. Dept. of Economics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
33.Edwards, C. A. 1965. Some side-effects from the use of persistent insecticides. Annals of Applied Biology 55:329331.Google Scholar
34.Farris, A. L., Klonglan, E. D., and Nomsen, R. C.. 1977. The ring-necked pheasant in Iowa. Iowa Conservation Commission, Des Moines, Iowa.Google Scholar
35.Finlayson, B. J., and Fagella, G. A.. 1986. Comparison of laboratory and field observation of fish exposed to herbicides molinate and thiobencarb. Trans. of American Fisheries Society 115:882890.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Flach, K. W. 1990. Low-input agriculture and soil conservation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 45(1):4244.Google Scholar
37.Flickinger, E., King, K., Stout, W., and Mohn, M.. 1980. Wildlife hazards from Furadan 3G applications to rice in Texas. Journal of Wildlife Management 44(1):190196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.Forsyth, D. J. 1989. Agricultural chemicals and prairie pothole wetlands: Meeting the needs of the resource and the farmer - a Canadian perspective. Trans. North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conf. 54:5966.Google Scholar
39.Freemark, K., Collins, B., Weseloh, C., Csizy, M., Rogers, C., Harris, W., Cyr, A., and Lepage, D.. 1991. Comparative field study to evaluate impacts of agricultural practices on birds in Canada. Progress report. Canadian Wildlife Service, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
40.Galindo, J., Kendall, R. J., Driver, C. J., and Lacher, T. E. Jr., 1984. The effects of methyl parathion on susceptibility of bobwhite quail to domestic house cat predation. Behavioral and Neurological Biology 43:2136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41.Goodman, L. R., Hansen, D. J., Coppage, D. L., Moore, J. C., and Mathews, E.. 1979. Diazinon: Chronic toxicity to, and brain acetylcholinesterase inhibition in, the sheepshead minnow, Cyprinodon variegatus. Trans. of American Fisheries Society 108:479488.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42.Graber, J. W., and Graber, R. R.. 1983. The declining grassland birds. Illinois Natural History Survey No. 227. Champaign, Illinois.Google Scholar
43.Gremaud, G. K. 1983. Factors influencing bird use of rowcrop fields. M.S. thesis, Dept. Animal Ecology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
44.Grue, C. E., DeWeese, L. R., Mineau, P., Swanson, G. A., Foster, J. R., Arnold, P. M., Huckins, J. N., Sheehan, P. J., Marshall, W. K., and Ludden, A. P.. 1986. Potential impacts of agricultural chemicals on waterfowl and other wildlife inhabiting prairie wetlands: An evaluation of research needs and approaches. Trans. North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conf. 51:357383.Google Scholar
45.Grue, C. E., Tome, M. W., Swanson, G. A., Borthwick, S. M., and DeWeese, L. R.. 1988. Agricultural chemicals and the quality of prairie-pothole wetlands for adult and juvenile waterfowl - what are the concerns? In Proc. National Symposium on Protection of Wetlands from Agricultural Impacts.Colorado State University,Fort Collins, Colorado, pp. 55–64.Google Scholar
46.Grue, C. E., DeWeese, L. R., Swanson, G. A., Borthwick, S. M., and Bunck, C. M.. 1990. Effects of aerial applications of 2,4-D, fenvalerate, and ethyl and methyl parathion on waterfowl inhabiting prairie-pothole wetlands. In Environmental Contaminants and Their Effects on Biota of the Northern Plains, Proc. North Dakota Wildlife Society symposium, Bismarck, North Dakota.Google Scholar
47.Hammerquist-Wilson, M. M., and Crawford, J. A.. 1981. Response of bobwhites to cover changes within three grazing systems. Journal of Range Management 34(3):213215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48.Henny, C. J., Blus, L. J., Kolbe, E. J., and Fitzner, R. E.. 1985. Organophosphate insecticide (famphur) topically applied to cattle kills magpies and hawks. Journal of Wildlife Management 49(3):648658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49.Henny, C. J., and Herron, G.. 1989. DDE, selenium, mercury, and white-faced ibis reproduction at Carson Lake, Nevada. Journal of Wildlife Management 53(4):10321044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50.Hoffman, D. J., Franson, J. C., Pattee, O. H., and Brunck, C. M.. 1985. Survival, growth and histopathological effects of paraquat ingestion in nestling American kestrels. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 14:495500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51.Holechek, J. L., Valdez, R., Schemnitz, S. D., Pieper, R. D., and Davis, C. A.. 1982. Manipulation of grazing to improve or maintain wildlife habitat. Wildlife Society Bull. 10(3):204210.Google Scholar
52.Johansen, C. A. 1977. Pesticides and pollination. Annual Review of Entomology 22:177192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53.Kendall, R. J., Noblet, R., Brewer, L. W., Hooper, M. J., Cobb, G. P., and Brewer, R. A.. 1990. Survivability, movement patterns and blood cholinesterase levels of wild northern bobwhites dosed with Counter. Research report, Institute of Wildlife and Environmental Toxicology, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina.Google Scholar
54.Kevan, P. G., Clark, A., and Thomas, V. G.. 1990. Insect pollinators and sustainable agriculture. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 5(1):1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55.Klaas, E. E. 1982. Effects of pesticides on nontarget organisms. In Dahlgren, R. B. (ed.). Proc. Midwest Agricultural Interfaces With Fish and Wildlife Resources Workshop. Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. pp. 79.Google Scholar
56.Kumar, S., and Pant, S. C.. 1984. Organal damage caused by Aldicarb to a freshwater teleost Barbus conchonius Hamilton. Bulletin of Environmental Contaminants Toxicology 33:5055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
57.Leighton, F. A., and Wobeser, G. A.. 1990. Occurrences of poisoning of wild birds. In Environmental Contaminants and Their Effects on Biota of the Northern Plains, Proc. North Dakota Wildlife Society symposium, Bismarck, North Dakota.Google Scholar
58.Leininger, W. C. (ed.). 1988. Non-chemical alternatives for managing selected plant species in the Western United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Colorado State University Cooperative Extension, Fort Collins, Colorado.Google Scholar
59.Lenat, D. R. 1984. Agriculture and stream water quality: A biological evaluation of erosion control practices. Environmental Management 8(4):333344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
60.Lyon, L. 1991. Personal communication, December 12. Biologist and National Pest Management Coordinator, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
61.Martin, P. A., and Solomon, K. R.. 1990. Potential effects of carbofuran during the initial upland brood movement of mallard ducklings. In Environmental Contaminants and Their Effects on Biota of the Northern Plains, Proc. North Dakota Wildlife Society symposium, Bismarck, North Dakota.Google Scholar
62.Menzel, B. 1982. Farming impacts on fishery resources. In Dahlgren, R. B. (ed.). Proc. Midwest Agricultural Interfaces with Fish and Wildlife Resources Workshop. Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. pp. 2729.Google Scholar
63.Messmer, T. A. 1990. Influence of grazing treatments on nongame birds and vegetation structure in southcentral North Dakota. Ph.D. dissertation. Dept. of Animal and Range Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota.Google Scholar
64.National Coalition Against the Misuse of Pesticides. 1991. Technical report 6(6):2.Google Scholar
65.National Research Council. 1989. Alternative Agriculture. Board on Agriculture. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
66.Papendick, R. I., Elliott, L. F., and Dahlgren, R. B.. 1986. Environmental consequences of modern production agriculture: How can alternative agriculture address these issues and concerns? American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 1(1):310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
67.Potts, G. R. 1985. Herbicides and the decline of the partridge: An international perspective. In British Crop Protection Conference—Weeds 983–990.Google Scholar
68.Rabb, G. B. 1990. Declining amphibian populations. Species: Newsletter of the Species Survival Commission, IUCN, World Conservation Union 13 & 14:3334.Google Scholar
69.Rattner, B. A., and Franson, J. C.. 1983. Methyl parathion and fenvalerate toxicity in American kestrels: Acute physiological responses and effects of cold. Canadian Journal of Physiological Pharmacology 62:787792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
70.Root, T. 1991. Personal communication, June 14. Farming coordinator, DeSoto Bend National Wildlife Refuge, Missouri Valley, Iowa.Google Scholar
71.Sedivec, K., Barker, W., and Nyren, P.. 1989. Effects of grazing systems on upland nesting waterfowl species in southcentral North Dakota. North Dakota State University. 1989 Grass and Beef Research Review, pp. 1820.Google Scholar
72.Sedivec, K. K., Messmer, T. A., Barker, W. T., Higgins, K. F., and Hertel, D. R.. 1990. Nesting success of upland nesting waterfowl and sharptailed grouse in specialized grazing systems in southcentral North Dakota. In Proc. of the Symposium Can Livestock Be Used as a Tool to Enhance Wildlife Habitat?43rd Annual Meeting, Society for Range Management,Reno, Nevada.Google Scholar
73.Smith, P. W. 1971. Illinois streams: A classification based on their fishes and an analysis of factors responsible for disappearance of native species. Illinois Natural History Survey Biol. Notes 76. Champaign, Illinois.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
74.Stickel, W. 1973 Effects on wildlife of newer pesticides and other pollutants. Proc. 53rd Annual Conference, Western Assoc. of State Game and Fish Commissioners,Salt Lake City, Utah. pp. 484–493.Google Scholar
75.Stinson, E. R., and Bromley, P. T.. 1991. Pesticides and wildlife: A guide to reducing impacts on animals and their habitat. Virginia Dept. of Game and Inland Fisheries (Pub. 420–004), Blacksburg, Virginia.Google Scholar
76.Tome, M. W., and Grue, C. E.. 1990a. Spray deposit in the wetland emergent zone following an aerial application of ethyl parathion to sunflowers in North Dakota. In Environmental Contaminants and Their Effects on Biota of the Northern Plains. Proc. North Dakota Wildlife Society symposium, Bismarck, North Dakota.Google Scholar
77.Tome, M. W., and Grue, C. E.. 1990b. Effects of an aerial application of ethyl parathion on selected aquatic invertebrate populations inhabiting prairie pothole wetlands. In Environmental Contaminants and Their Effects on Biota of the Northern Plains, Proc. North Dakota Wildlife Society symposium, Bismarck, North Dakota.Google Scholar
78.Trautman, C. G. 1982. History, ecology and management of the ring-necked pheasant in South Dakota. South Dakota Dept. of Game, Fish and Parks, Pierre, South Dakota.Google Scholar
79.Turnbull, R., Johnson, F., Hernandez, M., Wheeler, W., and Toth, J.. 1989. Pesticide residues in fulvous whistling-ducks from south Florida. Journal of Wildlife Management 53:10521057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
80.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1989. Carbofuran: A special review technical support document. Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
81.U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1989. Endangered species technical bulletin 14(12):17.Google Scholar
82.U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1990. Administrative manual, pest management policy and responsibilities, release no. 30–5. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
83.U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1991. Region 6 herbicide use report - 1980 through 1990. Refuges and Wildlife, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
84.Vance, D. R. 1976. Changes in land use and wildlife populations in southeastern Illinois. Illinois Wildlife Society Bulletin 4:121136.Google Scholar
85.Virginia Dept. of Agriculture and Consumer Services. 1991. Board seeks emergency regulation against pesticide (news release May 10). Richmond, Virginia.Google Scholar
86.Ware, B. W., Cahill, W. P., Gerhardt, P. G., and Witt, J. M.. 1970. Pesticide drift IV, ontarget deposits. Journal of Economic Entomology 61:19821983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
87.Warner, R. E. 1991. Illinois farm programs: Long-term impacts on terrestrial ecosystems and wildlife-related recreation, tourism, and economic development. Report prepared for Illinois Dept. of Energy and Natural Resources, Research and Planning Division, Springfield, Illinois.Google Scholar
88.Warner, R. E., and Etter, S. L.. 1989. Hay cutting and the survival of pheasants: A longterm perspective. Journal of Wildlife Management 53(2):455461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
89.Way, M. J., and Scopes, N. E.. 1965. Side effects of some soil-applied systemic insecticides. Annals of Applied Biology 55:340341.Google Scholar
90.Wilson, R. 1991. Personal communication, July 10. Wildlife specialist, Appropriate Technology Transfer for Rural Areas, Fayetteville, Arkansas.Google Scholar