Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T10:07:10.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indonesian Nationalization Measures—An Intervention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

B. A. Wortley
B. A. Wortley*
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Comments
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , July 1961 , pp. 680 - 683
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Baade, Hans W., “Indonesian Nationalization Measures before Foreign Courts — A Reply,” 54 A.J.I.L. 801 (1960)Google Scholar; Martin Domke, “Indonesian. Nationalization Measures before Foreign Courts,” 54 ibid. 305.

2 See Wortley, , “Pirata Non Mutat Dominium,” 24 British Year Book of International Law 258 (1947)Google Scholar.

3 H. A. Smith, “Booty of War,” 23 ibid. 227 (1946).

4 See Downey, Wm. G. Jr., “Captured Enemy Property : Booty of War and Seized Enemy Property,” 44 A.J.I.L. 488, at 497 (1950)Google Scholar.

5 See Wortley, B. A., “The General Principles of Private International Law,” 94 Hague Academy of International Law, Recueil des Cours 85, at 192-252 (1958, II)Google Scholar.

6 Katzarov’s argument ín his work, Théorie de la Nationalisation (Paris, 1960), that nationalization is sui generis, is far from convincing, as the writer of this note tries to show in a review published in the International and Comparative Law Quarterly, April, 1961, p. 370.