Hostname: page-component-6dbcb7884d-t8hx9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T05:22:48.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Oklahoma Court Addresses Proof of Prejudice for Failure to Provide Consular Access

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 100 , Issue 2 , April 2006 , pp. 462 - 463
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Avena (Mex.v.U.S.) (Int’l Ct.Justice Mar.31, 2004),43 ILM 581 (2004); see Sean, D. Murphy, Contemporary Practice of the United States, 98 AJIL 364 (2004)Google Scholar.

2 See Sean, D. Murphy, Contemporary Practice of the United States, 98 AJIL 581 (2004)Google Scholar; John, R. Crook, Contemporary Practice of the United States, 99 AJIL 695 (2005)Google Scholar.

3 Torres v. State, 120 P.3d 1184, 1186-87 (Okla. Crim. App. 2005) (footnotes omitted).