Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T03:26:56.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transparency in International Law. Edited by Andrea Bianchi and Anne Peters. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013. Pp. xx, 620. Index. $140, £90.

Review products

Transparency in International Law. Edited by Andrea Bianchi and Anne Peters. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013. Pp. xx, 620. Index. $140, £90.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Geir Ulfstein
Geir Ulfstein*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law, University of Oslo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Recent Books on International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 109 , Issue 2 , April 2015 , pp. 448 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, July 25, 1998, UN Doc. ECE/CEP/43, 38 ILM 517 (1999), at http://www.unece.org/env/pp/welcome.html.

2 Prosecutor v. Simicć, Case No. IT-95-9-PT, Decision on Testimony of a Witness, para. 74 (July 27, 1999) (“conclud[ing] that the ICRC has a right under customary international law to non-disclosure of the Information”).

3 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Art. 73, July 17, 1998, 2187 UNTS 90 (noting in part that “[i]f the originator is not a State Party and refuses to consent to disclosure, the requested State shall inform the Court that it is unable to provide the document or information because of a pre-existing obligation of confidentiality to the originator”).

4 E.g., Claude-Reyes v. Chile, Merits, Reparations & Costs, Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (ser. C) No. 151, para. 174 (Sept. 19, 2006), at http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_l5l_ing.pdf; Társaság a Szabadságjogokért v. Hungary, App. No. 37374/05, paras. 37—39 (Eur. Ct. H.R.Apr. 14, 2009), at http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=00l-92171#{“itemid”:[“001-92171”]}.

5 Human Rights Comm., General Comment No. 34, Art. 19: Freedoms of Opinion and Expression, para.