Article contents
United States Abstains on Security Council Resolution Authorizing Referral of Darfur Atrocities to International Criminal Court
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017
Abstract
- Type
- Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2005
References
1 See Crook, John R., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 99 AJIL 501 (2005)Google Scholar; France Offers, U.S. a Dilemma on Sudan, Wash. Post, Mar. 24, 2005, at A16 Google Scholar; Hoge, Warren, France Asking U.N. to Refer Darfur to International Court, N.Y. Times, Mar. 24, 2005, at A3 Google Scholar; Hoge, Warren, U.N. Votes to Send any Sudan War Crimes Suspects to [International Criminal] Court, N.Y. Times, Apr. 1, 2005, at A6 Google Scholar; Lynch, Colum, U.N. Council’s Resolution on Atrocities in Sudan Is Passed, Wash. Post, Apr. 1, 2005, at A21 Google Scholar; Turner, Mark, US Compromise Allows Darfur Atrocities to Be Referred to ICC, Fin. Times, Apr. 2, 2005, at 3 Google Scholar; Lengthening the Arm of Global Law, Economist, Apr. 9, 2005, at 38 Google Scholar
2 USUN Press Release, Explanation of Vote by Ambassador Anne W. Patterson, Acting U.S. Representative to the United Nations, on the Sudan Accountability Resolution, in the Security Council (Mar. 31, 2005), at <http://www.usunnewyork.usmission.gov>.
3 Sudanese President Vows to Defy U.N. Vote, Wash. Post, Apr. 3, 2005, at A30 Google Scholar. On the ICC’s view of matters, see Simons, Marlise, Sudan Poses First Big Trial for World Criminal Court, N.Y. Times, Apr. 29, 2005 at A10 Google Scholar.
- 6
- Cited by