Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:59:59.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Applicability of Article VI, Section 22, of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Terry D. Gill
Terry D. Gill*
Affiliation:
Institute of Public International Law , University of Utrecht
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
International Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 84 , Issue 3 , July 1990 , pp. 742 - 746
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Feb. 13, 1946, 21 UST 1418, TIAS No. 6900, 1 UNTS 4.

2 The request was made pursuant to Article 96, paragraph 2 of the United Nations Charter and in accordance with General Assembly Resolution 89 (I) of December 11, 1946, on a priority basis.

3 Judges Oda, Evensen and Shahabuddeen appended separate opinions to the decision.

4 Sub-Comm’n Res. 1985/12 (Aug. 29).

5 Sub-Comm’n Dec. 1987/112 (Sept. 4).

6 1989 ICJ Rep. 177, 183, para. 19.

7 Sub-Comm’n Res. 1988/37 (Sept. 1).

8 1989 ICJ Rep. at 184, para. 23.

9 Id. at 185, para. 24.

10 Id.

11 Id.

12 Id. at 187, para. 27.

13 Id. at 188, para. 29.

14 Interpretation of Peace Treaties, 1950 ICJ Rep. 65, 71 (Advisory Opinion of Mar. 30).

15 1989 ICJ Rep. at 189, para. 31.

16 Id. at 190, para. 35.

17 Western Sahara, 1975 ICJ Rep. 12, 25, paras. 32–33 (Advisory Opinion of Oct. 16)(considerations of judicial propriety might impel the Court to refuse an opinion when consent is lacking).

18 1989 ICJ Rep. at 190–91, paras. 37–39.

19 Id. at 194, para. 47.

20 Id. at 195, para. 49.

21 Id., para. 51.

22 Id. at 197, para. 55.

23 Id. at 198, para. 59.

24 Id. at 200, para. 1 (Oda, J., sep. op.) (emphasis in original).

25 Id. at 208, para. 23.

26 1989 ICJ Rep. at 210–11 (Evensen, J., sep. op.).

27 1989 ICJ Rep. at 219 (Shahabuddeen, J., sep. op.).

28 Id. at 221.