Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T01:24:35.536Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Application of Forum Non Conveniens Doctrine to Arbitral Award Proceeding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2017

Sean D. Murphy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 97 , Issue 1 , January 2003 , pp. 208
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Monegasque de Reassurances v. Nak Naftogaz of Ukraine, 311 F.3d 488 (2d Cir. 2002).

2 See Monegasque de Reassurances v. Nak Naftogaz of Ukraine, 158 F. Supp.2d 377, 387-88 (S.D.N.Y. 2001).

3 Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, June 10, 1958, 21 UST 2517, 330 UNTS 38. The Convention is implemented in the United States by 9 U.S.C. §§1330, 1602-1611 (2000).

4 311 F.3d at 496 (citation omitted).