No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 May 2017
1 The legislation of various countries is reproduced in League of Nations Document,C. 352, M. 126, 1927, pp. 17-28.
2 To this end, two large volumes, entitled The Law of the Associated Press, were published in New York in 1919.
3 See, for example, Chicago Board of Trade v. Christie Grain & Stock Co. (1905), 198 U. S. 236; Hunt v. N. Y. Cotton Exchange (1907), 205 U. S. 323; National Tel. News Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co. (1902), 119 Fed. 294; Chicago Board of Trade v. Tucker (1915), 221 Fed. 305.
4 Exchange Tel. Co., Ltd. v. Central News, Ltd. [1897], 2 Ch. 48.
5 See Tribune Co. of Chicago v. Associated Press (1900), 116 Fed. 126; Chicago Record-Herald Co. v. Tribune Association (1921), 275 Fed. 797.
6 (1918), 248 U. S. 205.
7 See Tribune Co. of Chicago v. Associated Press (1900), 116 Fed. 126.
8 See the excellent study, “La Convention de Berne et le Droit de Reproduction en matiere de Joumaux et de Publications Piriodiqv.es,”Le Droit d'Auteur, 1926, pp. 73-82.
9 See La Propriété IndustrieUe, 1925, pp. 225-226.
10 See League of Nations Document, C. 352, M. 126, 1927.
11 League of Nations Document, Conf. E. P. 13, General, 1927, 15.
12 For later action by the Council and Assembly of the League of Nations concerning the report of the Conference of Press Experts, see League of Nations Official Journal, 1927, pp. 1103-1108, and ibid., Spec. Supp. No. 53, p. 34. See, also, League of Nations Document, C. L. 20. 1928.