Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:27:08.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 818 F.2d 1473, 1477.

2 717 F.2d 1295 (9th Cir. 1983).

3 Affidavit of Mr. Benigno Alas, 818 F.2d at 1501 (Nelson, J., dissenting).

4 818 F.2d at 1480 (emphasis in original).

5 Id.

6 Id. at 1478.

7 Id. at 1481. The act of state doctrine provides that “the courts of one country will not sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another done within its own territory.” Underhill v. Hernandez, 168 U.S. 250, 252 (1897).

8 818 F.2d at 1482 (quoting Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba, 425 U.S. 682, 706 (1976) (opinion of White, Powell and Rehnquist, JJ., and Burger, C.J.)) (emphasis in original).

9 See Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398 (1964).

10 818F.2dat 1486.

11 Id. at 1488.

12 Id.

13 Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 806 F.2d 344 (2d Cir. 1986) (refusing to apply act of state doctrine), summarized in 81 AJIL 417 (1987).