Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T02:08:49.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Russian Reinsurance Company Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

Edwin D. Dickinson
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , October 1925 , pp. 753 - 756
Copyright
Copyright © by the American Society of International Law 1925

References

1 “Recent Recognition Cases,” this JOURNAL, Vol. 19, p. 263 (April, 1925).Google Scholar

2 Sokoloff «. National City Bank, (1924) 239 N. Y. 158;Google Scholar Fred S. James & Co. v. Second Russian Insurance Co. (1925) 239 N. Y. 248.Google Scholar

3 (1925) 240 N. Y. 149;Google Scholar 147 N. B. 703.Google Scholar

4 In recent English cases it was argued before the House of Lords that Soviet nationalization decrees had terminated the corporate existence of Russian banks, but the House of Lords was not satisfied that the Soviet decrees were intended to have this effect. Russian Commercial and Industrial Bank v. Comptoir d'Escompte de Mulhouse, [1925] A. C. 112;

5 (1925) 207 N. Y. Supp. 574.Google Scholar

6 147 N. E. 703, 706.Google Scholar

7 147 N. E. 703, 708.Google Scholar

8 147 N. E. 703, 705.Google Scholar