Article contents
A Special Chamber of the International Court of Justice — An Alternative to Ad Hoc Arbitration
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2017
Extract
Litigation of contentious cases before the International Court of Justice has in some instances been a lengthy and comparatively expensive procedure. However, it is not necessarily the Court or its procedure that produces this situation, because governments parties to litigation sometimes feel it is important to retain a number of advocates to plead, and they agree on comparatively long periods for the preparation of written pleadings. Comparing this procedure with ad hoc arbitration before a referee and two arbitrators, the latter looks comparatively swift and inexpensive. However, there are as yet unused possibilities for the International Court to adjudicate cases on a basis comparable in time and expense to ad hoc arbitration. The use of the Court for what might be less important cases would also contribute to its institutional development.
- Type
- Notes and Comments
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1968
References
1 Discussed in Hudson, The Permanent Court of International Justice 1920-1942, Sec. 392 (1943).
- 5
- Cited by