Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T06:29:49.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Special Chamber of the International Court of Justice — An Alternative to Ad Hoc Arbitration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Extract

Litigation of contentious cases before the International Court of Justice has in some instances been a lengthy and comparatively expensive procedure. However, it is not necessarily the Court or its procedure that produces this situation, because governments parties to litigation sometimes feel it is important to retain a number of advocates to plead, and they agree on comparatively long periods for the preparation of written pleadings. Comparing this procedure with ad hoc arbitration before a referee and two arbitrators, the latter looks comparatively swift and inexpensive. However, there are as yet unused possibilities for the International Court to adjudicate cases on a basis comparable in time and expense to ad hoc arbitration. The use of the Court for what might be less important cases would also contribute to its institutional development.

Type
Notes and Comments
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Discussed in Hudson, The Permanent Court of International Justice 1920-1942, Sec. 392 (1943).