Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T02:13:07.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

United States v. Maine et al.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Alona E. Evans
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 69 , Issue 2 , April 1975 , pp. 432 - 435
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Prepared by Mr. Donald E. Karl, Harvard Law School.

1 43 U.S.C. §§1301-15.

2 43 U.S.C. §§1331-43.

3 Florida filed a motion for severance on the ground that its asserted rights were based on factual issues wholly distinct from those of the other States. At the recommendation of the special master, the Supreme Court granted the motion. 403 U.S. 949 (1971).

4 332 U.S. 19 (1947); 42 AJIL 209 (1948).

5 339 U.S. 699 (1950).

6 339 U.S. 707 (1950); 44 AJIL 770 (1950).

7 United States v. Louisiana, 363 U.S. 1 (1960).

8 Fulton, T., The Sovereignty of the Sea (1911)Google Scholar.

9 [1876-77] 2 Ex. D. 63.