No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017
1 Osorio v. Dole Food Co., No. 07–22693, 2009 U.S. Dist. Lexis 99981 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 20,2009); see Edvard, Pettersson, Dole Doesn’t Have to Pay Nicaraguan Verdict, U.S. Judge Rules (Oct. 21, 2009)Google Scholar, at http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&sid=a5nlMjavvtrM.
2 Osorio v. Dole Food Co., 2009 U.S. Dist. Lexis 99981, at *13–14.
3 Id. at *15 (citation omitted).
4 Id. at *28.
5 Fla. Stat. §§55.601–55.607 (2009).
6 Osorio v. Dole Food Co., No. 07–22693–CIV, 2009 U.S. Dist. Lexis 713 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 5, 2009).
7 Osorio v. Dole Food Co., 2009 U.S. Dist. Lexis 99981, at *6.
8 Id.at *11.
9 Id. at *42–50.
10 Id. at *63 (“It appears, therefore, that the majority of plaintiffs who recovered in this case suffered from injuries for which, according to the unrefuted medical testimony presented to the Court, there is no medical evidence that DBCP is capable of causing.”).
11 Id. at*56.
12 Id. at *77 (citation omitted).
13 Id. at*78–99.
14 Id. at *106 (citation omitted).
15 Id. at *114–15.