Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T05:33:13.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

U.S. Supreme Court Applies International Intermodal Through Bill of Lading, Sends Claim for Damages in U.S. Rail Crash to Japanese Courts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v. Regal–Beloit Corp (S.Ct. June 21, 2010), at http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08–l 553.pdf.

2 Id. at 20.

3 46 U.S.C. §30701 note. COGSA governs the terms of bills of lading issued by ocean carriers engaged in U.S. foreign trade.

4 The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Kirby, 543 U. S. 14 (2004), that a domestic rail carrier can invoke bill of lading provisions allowed by COGSA, notwithstanding contrary state law requirements.

5 49 U.S.C. §11706.

6 Regal–Beloit Corp. v. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd., 557 F.3d 985, 991 (9th Cir. 2009).

8 Justice Kennedy authored the Court’s opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Thomas, Breyer, and Alito. Justice Sotomayor dissented, joined by Justices Stevens and Ginsburg.

9 Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v. Regal–Beloit Corp., slip op. at 12.

10 Id at 13, 17–18.