Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:59:29.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coercion and (Global) Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

LAURA VALENTINI
LAURA VALENTINI*
Affiliation:
Queen's College, University of Oxford
*
Laura Valentini is Junior Research Fellow in Politics, Queen's College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK OX1 4AW. (laura.valentini@queens.ox.ac.uk).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, I develop a new account of the liberal view that principles of justice (in general) are meant to justify state coercion, and consider its implications for the question of global socioeconomic justice (in particular). Although contemporary proponents of this view deny that principles of socioeconomic justice apply globally, on my newly developed account this conclusion is mistaken. I distinguish between two types of coercion, systemic and interactional, and argue that a plausible theory of global justice should contain principles justifying both. The justification of interactional coercion requires principles regulating interstate interference; that of systemic coercion requires principles of global socioeconomic justice. I argue that the proposed view not only helps us make progress in the debate on global justice, but also offers an independently compelling and systematic account of the function and conditions of applicability of justice.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 105 , Issue 1 , February 2011 , pp. 205 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abizadeh, Arash. 2008. “Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders.” Political Theory 36 (1): 37–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Scott. 2006. “Coercion.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2006/entries/coercion/ (accessed October 31, 2010).Google Scholar
Barry, Brian. 1991. Liberty and Justice: Essays in Political Theory 2. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles. 1975. “Justice and International Relations.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (4): 360–89.Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles. 1983. “Cosmopolitan Ideals and National Sentiment.”Journal of Philosophy 80 (10): 591–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitz, Charles. 1999. Political Theory and International Relations, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blake, Michael. 2001. “Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 30 (3): 257–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, Gillian. 2009. Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caney, Simon. 2005. Justice beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Ian. 1999. A Measure of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 1983. “The Structure of Proletarian Unfreedom.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (1): 3–33.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 1991. “Capitalism, Freedom and the Proletariat.” In Liberty, ed. Miller, David. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua and Sabel, Charles. 2006. “Extra Rempublicam Nulla Justitia?” Philosophy and Public Affairs 34 (2): 147–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietsch, Peter. N.d. “Rethinking Sovereignty in International Fiscal Policy.” Review of International Studies. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Dietsch, Peter. 2011. “Tax Competition and Its Effects on Domestic and Global Justice.” In Social Justice, Global Dynamics: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, eds. Banai, Ayelet, Ronzoni, Miriam, and Schemmel, Christian. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gallie, W. B. 1956. “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of The Aristotelian Society 56: 167–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grewal, David Singh. 2008. Network Power: The Social Dynamics of Globalization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew. 2001. “Global Inequality and International Institutions.”Metaphilosophy 32 (1/2): 34–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Aaron. 2005a. “Power in Social Organization as the Subject of Justice.”Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (1): 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Aaron. 2005b. “Distributive Justice without Sovereign Rule: The Case of Trade.”Social Theory and Practice 31 (4): 533–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julius, A. J. 2006. “Nagel's Atlas.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 34 (2): 176–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. [1797] 1965. The Metaphysical Elements of Justice, Part I of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. John Ladd. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Kutz, Christopher. 2000. Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamond, Grant. 2000. “The Coerciveness of Law.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20 (1): 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, Christian, and Pettit, Philip. 2011. Group Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, Joan. 1988–89. “Bargaining Advantages and Coercion in the Market.” Philosophy Research Archives 14: 23–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meckled-Garcia, Saladin. 2008. “On the Very Idea of Cosmopolitan Justice: Constructivism and International Agency.” Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (3): 245–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, David. 1983. “Constraints on Freedom.” Ethics 94 (1): 66–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, David. 1991. Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, David. 1995. On Nationality. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Miller, David. 2002. “Caney's ‘International Distributive Justice’: A Response.” Political Studies 50 (5): 974–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, David. 2007. National Responsibility and Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, David. 2010. “Why Immigration Controls Are Not Coercive: A Reply to Arash Abizadeh.” Political Theory 38 (1): 111–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Richard. 1998. “Cosmopolitan Respect and Patriotic Concern.”Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (3): 202–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moellendorf, Darrel. 2002. Cosmopolitan Justice. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Moellendorf, Darrel. 2005. “The World Trade Organization and Egalitarian Justice.” Metaphilosophy 36 (1/2): 145–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 2005. “The Problem of Global Justice.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2): 113–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardin, Terry. 2005. “Justice and Coercion.” In International Society and Its Critics, ed. Bellamy, Alex J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 247–64.Google Scholar
Nardin, Terry. 2006. “International Political Theory and the Question of Justice.” International Affairs 82 (3): 449–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1969. “Coercion.” In Philosophy, Science, and Method: Essays in Honor of Ernest Nagel, eds. Morgenbesser, S., Suppes, P., and White, M.. New York: St Martin's, 440–72.Google Scholar
OECD. 1998. Harmful Tax Competition: An Emerging Global Issue. OECD Report.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Onora. 1991. “Which Are the Offers You Can't Refuse?” In Violence, Terrorism, and Justice, eds. Frey, R. G. and Morris, Christopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 170–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orrù, Elisa, and Miriam, Ronzoni. N.d. “Which Supranational Sovereignty? Criminal and Socio-economic Justice Compared.” Review of International Studies. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism. A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pevnick, Ryan. 2008. “Political Coercion and the Scope of Distributive Justice.” Political Studies 56 (2): 339–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. 1989. Realizing Rawls. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. 1992. “Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty.” Ethics 103 (1): 48–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. 2002. World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms. Cambridge, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1996. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999a. A Theory of Justice, rev. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999b. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur. 2004. “Authority and Coercion.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 32 (1): 2–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Mathias. 2005. “Do We Owe the Global Poor Assistance or Rectification?” Ethics and International Affairs 19 (1): 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Mathias. 2006. “What to Say about the State?”Social Theory and Practice 32 (4): 671–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronzoni, Miriam. 2009. “The Global Order: A Case of Background Injustice? A Practice-dependent Account.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 37 (3): 229–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sangiovanni, Andrea. 2007. “Global Justice, Reciprocity, and the State.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (1): 3–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. 2001. Boundaries and Allegiances: Problems of Responsibility and Justice in Liberal Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph. 2005. “The Overselling of Globalization.” In Globalization: What's New? ed. Weinstein, Michael M.. New York: Columbia University Press, 228–61.Google Scholar
Stilz, Anna. N.d. “Collective Responsibility and the State.” Journal of Political Philosophy. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Tan, Kok-Chor. 2004. Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism and Patriotism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentini, Laura. 2009. “Cosmopolitan or Social Liberal? Review of D. Miller, National Responsibility and Global Justice.” Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric 1 (2): 50–53.Google Scholar
Valentini, Laura. 2010. “Review of Gillian Brock, Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13. https://springerlink3.metapress.com/content/u058kq21506v0864/resource-secured/?target=fulltext.pdf&sid=xkwe1b45nttqgw45ixyzid55&sh=www.springerlink.com (accessed October 31, 2010).Google Scholar
Valentini, Laura. N.d. “Global Justice and Practice-dependence: Conventionalism, Institutionalism, Functionalism.” Journal of Political Philosophy. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1991. “Homelessness and the Issue of Freedom.” U.C.L.A. Law Review 39: 295–324.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. [1922] 1968. Economy and Society. eds. Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus. New York: Bedminster Press.Google Scholar
Wenar, Leif. 2002. “The Legitimacy of Peoples.” In Global Justice and Transnational Politics: Essays on the Moral and Political Challenges of Globalization, eds. Greiff, Pablo De and Cronin, Ciaran. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertheimer, Alan. 1987. Coercion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wolff, Robert P. [1970] 1998. In Defense of Anarchism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2004. “Responsibility and Global Labor Justice.” Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (4): 365–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2006. “Responsibility and Global Justice: A Social Connection Model.” Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1): 102–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, David. 1981. “Coercive Wage Offers.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (2): 121–45.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.