Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-2jptb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-24T06:16:22.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Primary Elections—Legislation of 1909–1910

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Leon E. Aylsworth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes on Current Legislation
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , February 1912 , pp. 60 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1912

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hereafter in this summary the term state will be applied to all nine without distinction.

2 See “Notes” in this Review, II, 271–72, 417–21; III, 561–62; IV, 569–71.

3 Ia., Kans., Mo., Nebr., No. Dak., Okla., So. Dak., Wash., Wis.

4 Idaho also requires three nominees for state offices at the last general election.

5 The secretary of state, treasurer, and comptroller.

6 Corresponding to district attorneys or state's attorneys in other states.

7 In Ariz, and N. H. the important judicial positions are filled by appointment.

8 Md. by act of 1908, while Mich, reënacts the provision of her law of 1907.

9 Provided the party vote equals ten per cent of the total vote of the state.

10 The Hinman-Green bill, before the New York legislature in 1909 and 1910, provided for the designation by party committees of candidates for nomination, who were to have first place on the primary ballot, but it failed to become a law.

11 Those of Ariz., Calif., Colo., Mich., Nev., N. H.

12 See “Notes” in this Review, III, 563–65, for a more complete treatment.

13 In Maryland this ground had already been covered in her corrupt practices act of 1908.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.