Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:57:49.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Racial Redistricting and African-American Representation: A Critique of “Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress?”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

David Lublin
David Lublin*
Affiliation:
American University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Contrary to Cameron, Epstein, and O'Halloran's article (1996), (1) racial redistricting remains vital to the election of African Americans to the U.S. House, and (2) the tradeoff between black descriptive and substantive representation is actually greater in the South than in the North. Substantive and methodological errors explain why they arrived at their findings. Specifically, their analysis ignores the effect of the presence of Latinos on the election of African Americans. Ironically, due to the very policy assessed in the article, Cameron, Epstein, and O'Halloran's data set does not allow them to examine the link between the racial composition of a district and the ideology of its representative. In addition, they do not consider that racial redistricting not only changes the aggregation of seats into votes but also indirectly boosts the Republican share of votes and seats.

Type
Forum
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 93 , Issue 1 , March 1999 , pp. 183 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bositis, David A. 1997. “The Future of Majority-Minority Districts and Black and Hispanic Legislative Representation.” Washington, DC: Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies.Google Scholar
Cameron, Charles, Epstein, David, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 1996. “Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress? American Political Science Review 90(12):794–812.Google Scholar
Davidson, Chandler, and Grofman, Bernard, eds. 1994. Quiet Revolution in the South: The Impact of the Voting Rights Act 1965–1990. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gay, Claudine. 1996. “Race and Political Context: The Impact of Black Congressional Representation on the Voting Behavior of White and Black Constituents.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and King, Gary. 1990. “Estimating the Incumbency Advantage without Bias.” American Journal of Political Science 34(11):1142–64.Google Scholar
Giles, Micheal W., and Buckner, Melanie A.. 1993. “David Duke and Black Threat: An Old Hypothesis Revisited.” Journal of Politics 55(08):702–13.Google Scholar
Grofman, Bernard, Griffin, Robert, and Glazer, Amihai. 1992. “The Effect of Black Population on Electing Democrats and Liberals to the House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17(08):365–79.Google Scholar
Grofman, Bernard, and Handley, Lisa. 1989. “Minority Population and Black and Hispanic Congressional Successes in the 1970s and 1980s.” American Politics Quarterly 17(10):436–45.Google Scholar
Grofman, Bernard, and Handley, Lisa. 1995. “1990s Issues in Voting Rights.” Mississippi Law Journal 65(2):205–70.Google Scholar
Handley, Lisa, Grofman, Bernard, and Arden, Wayne. 1998. “Electing Minority-Preferred Candidates to Legislative Office: The Relationship between Minority Percentages in Districts and the Election of Minority-Preferred Candidates.” In Race and Redistricting in the 1990s, ed. Grofman, Bernard. New York: Agathon. Pp. 13–38.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C., and Kernell, Samuel. 1983. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lublin, David. 1997a. “The Election of African Americans and Latinos to the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Politics Quarterly 25(3):269–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lublin, David. 1997b. The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lublin, David, and Tate, Katherine. 1995. “Racial Group Competition in Urban Elections.” In Classifying by Race, ed. Peterson, Paul E.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Pp. 245–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lublin, David, and Voss, D. Stephen. 1998. “The Partisan Impact of Voting Rights Law: A Reply to Pamela S. Karlan.” Stanford Law Review 50(3):765–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sleeper, Jim. 1997. Liberal Racism. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Swain, Carol M. 1993. Black Faces, Black Interests: The Representation of African Americans in Congress. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thernstrom, Stephen, and Thernstrom, Abigail. 1997. America in Black and White: One Nation Indivisible. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Voss, D. Stephen. 1996. “Beyond Racial Threat: Failure of an Old Hypothesis in the New South.” Journal of Politics 58(11): 1156–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.