Hostname: page-component-66644f4456-mv4w6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-13T10:36:48.405Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Struggle between “Religion and Nonreligion”: Jefferson, Backus, and the Dissonance of America's Founding Principles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2007

J. JUDD OWEN
J. JUDD OWEN
Affiliation:
Emory University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The prevailing view of both the U.S. Supreme Court and liberal theory in America is that liberal principles are neither essentially religious nor essentially secular, but somehow foundationally neutral, or in the words of the Court neutral between “religion and nonreligion.” This essay challenges the cogency of this view through a comparative examination of two strong defenders of religious freedom from the American revolutionary era: Thomas Jefferson and Isaac Backus. Jefferson, the Enlightenment rationalist, and Backus, the Calvinist-Baptist, may initially seem tailor-made for this foundational neutrality, but closer examination reveals that religious freedom for them was not only an extension of their radically opposed views on religion but also an instrument for the promotion of those views throughout society. The ambiguity of America's founding principles is best understood, not through the notion of neutrality, but as the product of a yet unsettled struggle between devout religion and secular Enlightenment.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 101 , Issue 3 , August 2007 , pp. 493 - 503
Copyright
© 2007 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Backus Isaac. 1871. A History of New England with Particular Reference to the Denomination of Christians called Baptists. Two Volumes. Newton, MA: Backus Historical Society.
Backus Isaac. 1968. Isaac Backus on Church, State, and Calvinism: Pamphlets, 1754–1789. Edited by William G. McLoughlin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cooke J. W. 1973. “Jefferson on Liberty.” Journal of the History of Ideas 34 (Fall): 563– 76.Google Scholar
Dienstag Joshua Foa. 1996a. “Between History and Nature: Social Contract Theory in Locke and the Founders.” Journal of Politics 58 (November): 985– 1009.Google Scholar
Dienstag Joshua Foa. 1996b. “Serving God and Mammon: The Lockean Sympathy in Early American Political Thought.” American Political Science Review 90 (September): 497– 511.Google Scholar
Dreisbach Daniel L. 2002. Thomas Jefferson and the Wall of Separation between Church and State. New York: New York University Press.
Hamburger Philip. 2002. Separation of Church and State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Hunter James Davison. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books.
Jefferson Thomas. 1904. The Writings of Thomas Jefferson. 20 volumes. ed. Albert Ellery Bergh and Andrew A. Lipscomb. Washington, DC: Thomas Jefferson Memorial Association.
Jefferson Thomas. 1943. The Complete Thomas Jefferson. Edited by Saul K. Padover. New York: Tudor.
Koch Adrienne. 1943. The Philosophy of Thomas Jefferson. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lindsay Thomas. 1991. “James Madison on Religion and Politics: Rhetoric and Reality.” American Political Science Review 85 (December): 1321– 37.Google Scholar
Luebke Fred C. 1943. “The Origins of Thomas Jefferson's Anti-Clericalism.” Church History 32 (September): 344– 56.Google Scholar
Macedo Stephen. 1990. Liberal Virtues. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Macedo Stephen. 1998. “Transformative Constitutionalism and the Case of Religion: Defending the Moderate Hegemony of Liberalism.” Political Theory 18 (February): 56– 80.Google Scholar
Macedo Stephen. 2000. Democracy and Distrust. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McConnell Michael. 1990. “The Origins and Historical Understanding of Free Exercise of Religion.” Harvard Law Review 103 (May): 1409– 1517.Google Scholar
McLoughlin William G. 1967. Isaac Backus and the American Pietistic Tradition. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
McLoughlin William G. 1968. “Isaac Backus and the Separation of Church and State in America.” American Historical Review 73 (June): 1392– 1413.Google Scholar
Newlin Claude. 1962. Philosophy and Religion in Colonial America. New York: Greenwood Press.
Owen J. Judd. 1999. “Church and State in Stanley Fish's Antiliberalism.” American Political Science Review 93 (December): 911– 24.Google Scholar
Owen J. Judd. 2001. Religion and the Demise of Liberal Rationalism: The Foundational Crisis of the Separation of Church and State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Owen J. Judd. nd. The Democratic Soul: Religious Transformation and Civic Life in Tocqueville and the Enlightenment. Manuscript on file with the author.
Pangle Thomas L. 1988. The Spirit of Modern Republicanism: The Moral Vision of the American Founders and the Philosophy of Locke. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rawls John. 1985. “Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 14 (Summer): 223– 51.Google Scholar
Rawls John. 1996. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Richards Peter Judson. 2001. “‘A Clear and Steady Channel’: Isaac Backus and the Limits of Liberty.” Journal of Church and State 43 (Summer): 447– 82.Google Scholar
Rorty Richard. 1991. Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sheldon Garrett Ward. 1991. The Political Philosophy of Thomas Jefferson. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Wolfe Alan. 1999. One Nation After All. New York: Pengui.
Yarbrough Jean. 1991. “Race and the Moral Foundation of the American Republic: Another Look at the Declaration and the Notes on Virginia.” Journal of Politics 53 (February): 90– 105.Google Scholar
Yarbrough Jean. 1998. American Virtues: Thomas Jefferson on the Character of a Free People. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.