Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:03:46.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Atomic Theory of Society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

William Orton*
Affiliation:
Smith College

Extract

In few affairs is political wisdom so put to the test as in the treatment of institutions that are growing old. Age in these cases has little to do with mere antiquity: the forms of social life are subject to no set term of years. It is a matter of continuing adaptability. Some institutions, like the British monarchy, possess this attribute in an astounding degree. Others, like the House of Lords, betray a hardening of the arteries that bodes ill for their survival in times of rapid change. For the speed of social change affects not only their physical and conceptual environment; it acts also upon, and through, the temper of the politicians and the public. In such periods society will sometimes administer a sudden coup de grâce to its more recalcitrant institutions, abolishing at one stroke both the abuses they have inflicted and the garnered wisdom they enshrine. The loss involved in these moments is seldom evident until long after, when it has to be made good ab ovo.

To such moods the Gallic genius is peculiarly liable; and it was in one of them that the French crashed open the gates of the nineteenth century and nailed the atomic theory of society to the lintel. “There are no longer any guilds in the state, but only the private interest of each individual and the general interest. No one may arouse in the citizens any intermediate interest, or separate them from the public weal by corporate sentiment.”

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Pic, , Traité élémentaire de législation industrielle, III, 4Google Scholar.

2 Éloge de Gournay, Schelle, , Oeuvres, vol. iGoogle Scholar. (Refs. are to Schelle's edn., throughout.) See also Higgs, , Physiocrats, p. 67Google Scholar.

3 Article Fondation: Oeuvres, vol. i.

4 Schelle, , Oeuvres, vol. iGoogle Scholar.

5 St.Léon, , Histoire des corporations de métiers, vol. 6, p. 3Google Scholar.

6 See Henri Sée, La France économique et sociale au XVIII siècle, ch. 6.

7 Mémoire: Oeuvres, vol. v.

8 St. Léon, loc cit.

9 Text in Oeuvres, vol. 5. Complete trans. in Shepherd, Turgot and the Six Edicts.

10 Quoted in Oeuvres, vol. 5.

11 In his History of the Revolution. See Léon Say, Turgot, ch. 8.

12 Say, op. cit., ch. 3.

13 Shepherd, op. cit., ch. 2.

14 L'Ancien Régime, vol. 3, p. 1Google Scholar.

15 Oeuvres, vol. 5.

16 Oeuvres, ch. 5.

17 Quoted in Say, op. cit., ch. 8.

18 Industrial Democracy, vol. 2, p. 566Google Scholar.

19 Cf. Pic, op. cit., Intro., ch. 3.

20 Anderson's trans. in Constitutions and Documents.

21 See St. Léon, op. cit., vol. 7, p. 1.

22 St. Léon, loc. cit.

23 Traité, vol. 3, p. 4Google Scholar.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.