Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-t27h7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-23T20:41:59.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of a Presidential Election Game

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Chester Spatt
Chester Spatt
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Communications
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 70 , Issue 4 , December 1976 , pp. 1221 - 1223
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 1221 note 1 See Banzhaf, John, “One Man, 3.312 Votes: A Mathematical Analysis of the Electoral College,” Villanova Law Review, 13 (Winter, 1968), 304–332Google Scholar.

page 1221 note 2 See p. 85 of Shapley, Lloyd S., “Political Science: Voting and Bargaining Games,” pp. 37–92Google Scholar in Notes of Lectures on Mathematics in the Behavioral Sciences: Lectures Given at the 1973 MAA Summer Seminar at Williams College, Williamstown, Massachusetts. Notes by Selby, Henry A., Mathematical Association of America, 1973Google Scholar.

page 1222 note 3 See Banzhaf, p. 308.

page 1222 note 4 See Owen, Guillermo, “Political Games,” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 18 (Sept., 1971), 345–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar. This is also discussed at pp. 76–78 of Shapley.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.