Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T20:09:50.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explaining the Variable Utility of Disjointed Incrementalism: Four Propositions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Ian Lustick
Ian Lustick*
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Much of mainstream organization theory has been concerned with the implications for organizational design and policy process of high levels of uncertainty or complexity in task environments. Decentralization, disjointed incrementalist decision strategies, and quasi-market coordinative mechanisms have been advanced as rational responses to the complexity of most problems in the socio-political sphere. This article presents and illustrates four conditions which reduce the relative utility of this approach as a means of coping with uncertainty. The propositions are shown to be implicit in the logic of “muddling through,” and are used to help explain/predict the evolution of relatively centralized and planned organizations in certain types of complex task environments.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 74 , Issue 2 , June 1980 , pp. 342 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, Graham (1971). Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Argyris, Chris, and Simon, Herbert (1973). Public Administration Review 33, Nos. 3–4.Google Scholar
Braybrooke, David, and Lindblom, Charles (1963). A Strategy of Decision. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
“Cancer and the Workplace: ‘A Disaster’” (1978). Science News Sept. 30, 1978, p. 150.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dorfman, Robert, and Dorfman, Nancy (1977). Economics of the Environment. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
“Gene-splicing Risks Assessed Low” (1979). Science News, 03 10, 1979, p. 150.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert, and Waldner, Ilmar (1979). “Thinking Big, Thinking Small, and Not Thinking at All.” Public Policy 27:1–24.Google Scholar
Halberstam, David (1972). The Best and the Brightest. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Halperin, Morton H. (1974). Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Landau, Martin (1969). “Redundancy, Rationality and the Problem of Duplication and Overlap.” Public Administration Review 29: 346–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, Martin (1973). “On the Concept of a Self-Correcting Organization.” Public Administration Review 33: 533–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaPorte, Todd, ed. (1975). Organized Social Complexity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles (1959). “The Science of ‘Muddling Through.’” Public Administration Review 19: 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Charles (1964). “Contexts for Change and Strategy: A Reply.” Public Administration Review 24: 157–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Charles (1965). The Intelligence of Democracy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles (1975). “The Sociology of Planning: Thought and Social Interaction.” In Bornstein, Morris (ed.), Economic Planning, East and West. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 23–60.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles (1977). Politics and Markets. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
March, James, and Simon, Herbert (1958). Organizations. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
“Recombinant DNA Guidelines Relaxed” (1978). Science News, Dec. 23, 30, 1978, p. 437.Google Scholar
Schulman, Paul R. (1975). “Nonincremental Policy Making: Notes Toward an Alternative Paradigm.” American Political Science Review 69: 1354–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert (1965). “The Architecture of Complexity.” General Systems Yearbook 10: 63–76.Google Scholar
Thompson, James D., and Tuden, Arthur (1959). “Strategies, Structures, and Processes of Organizational Decision.” Comparative Studies in Administration. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, James D. (1967). Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Thompson, Victor (1971). Decision Theory, Pure and Applied. New York: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wittfogel, Karl (1957). Oriental Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.