Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:13:14.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Independent Candidates and Political Representation in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2018

SACHA KAPOOR  and
ARVIND MAGESAN
SACHA KAPOOR*
Affiliation:
Erasmus University Rotterdam
ARVIND MAGESAN*
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
*
Sacha Kapoor is an Assistant Professor, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics H09-22, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands (kapoor@ese.eur.nl).
Arvind Magesan is an Associate Professor, University of Calgary, Department of Economics, 2500 University Way NW, Calgary AB, T2N1N4, Canada (arvindmagesan@gmail.com).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We estimate the causal effect of independent candidates on voter turnout and election outcomes in India. To do this, we exploit exogenous changes in the entry deposit candidates pay for their participation in the political process, changes that disproportionately excluded candidates with no affiliation to established political parties. A one standard deviation increase in the number of independent candidates increases voter turnout by more than 6 percentage points, as some voters choose to vote rather than stay home. The vote share of independent candidates increases by more than 10 percentage points, as some existing voters switch who they vote for. Thus, independents allow winning candidates to win with less vote share, decrease the probability of electing a candidate from the governing coalition by about 31 percentage points, and ultimately increase the probability of electing an ethnic-party candidate. Altogether, the results imply that the price of participation by independents is constituency representation in government.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 112 , Issue 3 , August 2018 , pp. 678 - 697
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank the editors, three thoughtful reviewers, Victor Aguirregabiria, Maarten Bosker, Branko Bŏsković, Pamela Campa, Benoit Crutzen, Robert Dur, Giovanni Facchini, Jean-Guillaume Forand, Francisco Gonzales, Francesca Jensenius, Ricardo Pique, Anthony Sayers, Dana Sisak, Otto Swank, Scott Taylor, Cecilia Testa, Vincent Rebeyrol, and Yu Wang for their feedback. Miguel Olivo-Villabrille and James Conley provided outstanding research assistance. This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC). Replication files are available at the American Political Science Review Dataverse: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AJHFHU.

References

REFERENCES

Afzal, Madiha. 2014. “Do Barriers to Candidacy Reduce Political Competition? Evidence from a Bachelor’s Degree Requirement for Legislators in Pakistan.” Public Choice 161 (1–2): 51–72.Google Scholar
Anckar, Carsten. 1997. “Determinants of Disproportionality and Wasted Votes.” Electoral Studies 16 (4): 501–15.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Gerber, Alan. 1996. “The Effects of Filing Fees and Petition Requirements on U.S. House Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 21 (2): 249–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asher, Sam, and Novosad, Paul. 2017. “Politics and Local Economic Growth: Evidence from India.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 9 (1): 229–73.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Mukulika. 2015. Why India Votes? New Delhi: Routledge.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S.. 1958. “Competition and Democracy.” The Journal of Law and Economics 1: 105–9.Google Scholar
Berry, Richard. 2008. Independent: The Rise of the Non-Aligned Politician. Exeter: Societas Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, Kaushik. 2014. “Strategic Entry and the Relationship between Number of Independent and Non-Independent Candidates: A Study of Parliamentary Elections in India.” Asian Journal of Political Science 22 (1): 93–112.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, Kaushik, and Mitra, Subrata K.. 2014. “More Can Be Less: Hyper Plurality of Candidates, the Rationality of Electoral Choice, and Need for Electoral Reform in India.” India Review 13 (1): 15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhavnani, Rikhil R. 2009. “Do Electoral Quotas Work After they are Withdrawn? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in India.” American Political Science Review 1 (103): 23–5.Google Scholar
Bhavnani, Rikhil R. 2017. “Do the Effects of Temporary Ethnic Group Quotas Persist? Evidence from India.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 9 (3): 105–23.Google Scholar
Bolleyer, Nicole, and Weeks, Liam. 2009. “The Puzzle of Non-Party Actors in Party Democracy: Independents in Ireland.” Comparative European Politics 7 (3): 299–324.Google Scholar
Brancati, Dawn. 2008. “Winning Alone: The Electoral Fate of Independent Candidates Worldwide.” The Journal of Politics 70 (3): 648–62.Google Scholar
Brollo, Fernanda, and Nannicini, Tommaso. 2012. “Tying Your Enemy’s Hands in Close Races: The Politicals of Federal Transfers in Brazil.” American Political Science Review 106 (4): 742–61.Google Scholar
Burgess, Robin, Jedwab, Remi, Miguel, Edward, Morjaria, Ameet, and Miguel, Gerard Padro I. 2015. “The Value of Democracy: Evidence from Road Building in Kenya.” American Economic Review 105 (6): 1817–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cancela, João, and Geys, Benny. 2016. “Explaining Voter Turnout: A Meta-Analysis of National and Subnational Elections.” Electoral Studies 42: 264–75.Google Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan. 2004. Why Ethnic Parties Succeed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clots-Figueras, Irma. 2011. “Women in Politics: Evidence from the Indian States.” Journal of Public Economics 95 (7-8): 664–90.Google Scholar
Coats, R. Morris, and Dalton, Thomas R.. 1992. “Entry Barriers in Politics and Uncontested Elections.” Journal of Public Economics 49 (1): 75–90.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1987. “Electoral Equilibrium Under Alternative Voting Institutions.” American Journal of Political Science 31 (1): 82–108.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. New Haven, CT: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Delimitation Commission of India. 2008. Changing Face of Electoral India. Technical report.Google Scholar
Drometer, Marcus, and Rincke, Johannes. 2009. “The Impact of Ballot Access Restrictions on Electoral Competition: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” Public Choice 138 (3): 461–74.Google Scholar
Duflo, Esther and Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra. 2004. “Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India.” Econometrica 72 (5): 1409–43.Google Scholar
Ehin, Piret, Madise, Ülle, Solvak, Mihkel, Raagepera, Rein, Vassil, Kristjan, and Vinkel, Priit. 2013. “Independent Candidates in National and European Elections.” Accessed December 20, 2017. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank.Google Scholar
Gentzkow, Matthew. 2006. “Television and Voter Turnout.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 121 (3): 931–72.Google Scholar
Grofman, Bernard and Lijpart, Arend. 1986. Electoral Laws and their Political Consequences, Vol. 1. New York: Algora Publishing.Google Scholar
Hall, Andrew B., and Snyder, James M.. 2015. “Information and Wasted Votes: A Study of U.S. Primary Elections.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 10: 433–59.Google Scholar
Hersch, Philip L., and McDougall, Gerald S.. 1994. “Campaign War Chests as a Barrier to Entry in Congressional Races.” Economic Inquiry 32 (4): 630–41.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, John, Batta, Anna, and Sortor, Angela. 2013. “Political Parties, Independents and the Electoral Market in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Party Politics 19 (5): 695–712.Google Scholar
Iyer, Lakshmi, Mani, Anandi, Mishra, Prachi, and Topalova, Petia. 2012. “The Power of Political Voice: Women’s Political Representation and Crime in India.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 4 (4): 165–93.Google Scholar
Jensenius, Francesca R. 2015. “Development from Representation? A Study of Quotas for Scheduled Castes in India.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 7 (3): 196–220.Google Scholar
Khemani, Stuti. 2007. “Does Delegation of Fiscal Policy to an Independent Agency Make a Difference? Evidence from Intergovernmental Transfers in India.” Journal of Development Economics 82: 464–84.Google Scholar
Kumar, Sanjay. 2009. “Patterns of Political Participation: Trends and Perspective.” Economic and Political Weekly 44 (39).Google Scholar
Kumar, Sanjay, and Banerjee, Souradeep. 2017. “Low Levels of Electoral Participation in Metropolitan Cities.” Economic and Political Weekly 52 (45).Google Scholar
Laakso, Markku and Taagepera, Rein. 1979. “The “Effective” Number of Parties: “A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12 (1): 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law Commission of India. 2015. Electoral Reforms. Technical Report 255.Google Scholar
Lizzeri, Alessandro, and Persico, Nicola. 2009. “A Drawback of Electoral Competition.” Journal of the European Economic Association 1: 1318–48.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1992. “A Deliberative Theory of Interest Representation.” The Politics of Interests: Interest Groups Transformed 32–57. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Moser, Robert G. 1999. “Independents and Party Formation: Elite Partisanship as an Intervening Variable in Russian Politics.” Comparative Politics 1: 147–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myerson, Roger. 1993. “Incentives to Cultivate Favored Minorities Under Alternative Electoral Systems.” American Political Science Review 87 (4): 856–69.Google Scholar
Nichter, Simeon. 2008. “Vote Buying or Turnout Buying? Machine Politics and the Secret Ballot.” American Political Science Review 102 (1): 19–31.Google Scholar
Osborne, Martin J., and Slivinski, Al. 1996. “A Model of Political Competition with Citizen-Candidates.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 111 (1): 65–96.Google Scholar
Owen, Diana, and Dennis, Jack. 1996. “Anti-Partyism in the USA and Support for Ross Perot.” European Journal of Political Research 29: 383–400.Google Scholar
Pande, Rohini. 2003. “Can Mandated Political Representation Increase Policy Influence for Disadvantaged Minorities? Theory and Evidence from India.” The American Economic Review 93 (4): 1132–51.Google Scholar
Rogowski, Jon C. 2016. “Presidential Influence in an Era of Congressional Dominance.” American Political Science Review 110 (2): 325–41.Google Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J. 1982. “Economic Adversity and Voter Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 26 (1): 25–46.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1968. Representational Systems. In International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences. Vol. 13, New York: Mcmillan, 470–5.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Verba, Sidney. 1979. Injury to Insult: Unemployment, Class, and Political Response. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shue, Kelly, and Luttmer, Erzo F.P.. 2009. “Who Misvotes? The Effect of Differential Cognition Costs on Election Outcomes.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 1 (1): 229–57.Google Scholar
Stratmann, Thomas. 2005. “Ballot Access Restrictions and Candidate Entry in Elections.” European Journal of Political Economy 21 (1): 59–71.Google Scholar
Tavits, Margit, and Annus, Taavi. 2006. “Learning to Make Votes Count: The Role of Democratic Experience.” Electoral Studies 25 (1): 72–90.Google Scholar
Thachil, Tariq, and Teitelbaum, Emmanuel. 2015. “Ethnic Parties and Public Spending: New Theory and Evidence from the Indian States.” Comparative Political Studies 48 (11): 1389– 420.Google Scholar
Tullock, Gordon. 1965. “Entry Barriers in Politics.” American Economic Review 55 (1/2): 458–66.Google Scholar
Ujhelyi, Gergely, Chatterjee, Somdeep, and Szabó, Andrea. 2017. “‘None of the Above’ Votes in India and the Consumption Utility of Voting.” Working paper.Google Scholar
Weeks, Liam. 2016. “Why Are There Independents in Ireland?” Government and Opposition 51 (4): 580–604.Google Scholar
Wright, Gerald C., and Schaffner, Brian F.. 2002. “The Influence of Party: Evidence from the State Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 96 (2): 367–79.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Kapoor and Magesan dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AJHFHU
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Kapoor and Magesan supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Kapoor and Magesan supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 439.5 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.