Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:57:41.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Interpose Your Friendly Hand”: Political Supports for the Exercise of Judicial Review by the United States Supreme Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2005

KEITH E. WHITTINGTON
KEITH E. WHITTINGTON
Affiliation:
Princeton University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The exercise of constitutional review by an independent and active judiciary is commonly regarded as against the interest of current government officials, who presumably prefer to exercise power without interference. In this article, I advance an “overcoming obstructions” account of why judicial review might be supported by existing power holders. When current elected officials are obstructed from fully implementing their own policy agenda, they may favor the active exercise of constitutional review by a sympathetic judiciary to overcome those obstructions and disrupt the status quo. This provides an explanation for why current officeholders might tolerate an activist judiciary. This dynamic is illustrated with case studies from American constitutional history addressing obstructions associated with federalism, entrenched interests, and fragmented and cross-pressured political coalitions.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 99 , Issue 4 , November 2005 , pp. 583 - 596
Copyright
© 2005 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman Bruce. 1991. We the People: Foundations, vol. 1. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Adams Charles Francis, Jr. 1875. “The Granger Movement.” North American Review 120 (April): 394– 423.Google Scholar
Albright Robert C. 1954. “Southerners Assail High Court Ruling.” Washington Post, 18 May, 2.Google Scholar
Albright Robert C. 1956. “Rest of Party Might Just Write Off the South.” Washington Post, 1 April, E1.Google Scholar
Andrews Edmund L. 1995. “Senate Supports Severe Penalties on Computer Smut.” The New York Times, 15 June, A1.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1890. “Notes of Recent Decisions: Regulation of Railway Fares.” American Law Review 24 (May–June): 516– 18.
Arnold R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Baker v. Carr. 1962. 369 U.S. 186.
Banning Lance. 1995. The Sacred Fire of Liberty: James Madison and the Founding of the Federal Republic. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Barrow Deborah J., Gary Zuk, and Gregory Gryski. 1996. The Federal Judiciary and Institutional Change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Bensel Richard F. 2000. The Political Economy of American Industrialization, 1877–1900. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Berman William. 1970. The Politics of Civil Rights in the Truman Administration. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Bryant Howard, and David Plotnikoff. 1996. “How the Decency Fight Was Won.” San Jose Mercury News, 3 March, 1D.Google Scholar
Burns James MacGregor. 1963. The Deadlock of Democracy: Four-Party Politics in America. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bush George W. 2002. Statement on Signing the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002. Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents, vol. 38, no. 13, p 517.Google Scholar
Caldeira Gregory A. 1986. “Neither the Purse Nor the Sword: Dynamics of Public Confidence in the Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 80 (December): 1209– 26.Google Scholar
Caldeira Gregory A., and Donald J. McCrone. 1982. “Of Time and Judicial Activism.” In Supreme Court Activism and Restraint, eds. Stephen Halpern and Charles Lamb. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Casper Jonathan D. 1976. “The Supreme Court and National Policy Making.” American Political Science Review 70 (March): 50– 63.Google Scholar
Cleveland Grover. 1933. Letters of Grover Cleveland, ed. Allan Nevins. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Clinton William J. 1997. Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton, 1996. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Clinton William J. 1998. Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton, 1997. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Colegrove v. Green, 1946. 328 U.S. 549
1894. Congressional Record. 53rd Cong., 2nd sess., vol. 26, pt. 7.
1995. Congressional Record. 104th Cong., 1st sess., vol. 141, pt. 3.
Cortner Richard C. 1970. The Apportionment Cases. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
Cox Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dahl Robert. 1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6 (Fall): 284– 95.Google Scholar
De Figueiredo John M., and Emerson Tiller. 1996. “Congressional Control of the Courts: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Expansion of the Federal Judiciary.” Journal of Law and Economics 39 (October): 435– 62.Google Scholar
Delton Jennifer A. 2002. Making Minnesota Liberal: Civil Rights and the Transformation of the Democratic Party. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Deudney Daniel. 1995. “The Philadelphia System: Sovereignty, Arms Control, and Balance of Powers in the American States-Union, Circa 1787–1861.” International Organization 49 (Spring): 191– 228.Google Scholar
Dillon John F., ed. 1903. John Marshall: Life, Character, and Judicial Services as Portrayed in the Centenary and Memorial Addresses and Proceedings throughout the United States on Marshall Day. 2 vols. Chicago: Callaghan and Company.
Dyer v. Abe. 1956. 138 F. Supp. 220 (D. Hawaii).
Eggert Gerald G. 1974. Richard Olney: Evolution of a Statesman. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Elster Jon. 2000. Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment, and Constraints. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Employers' Liability Cases. 1907. 207 U.S. 463.
Epstein Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Ferejohn John. 1999. “Independent Judges, Dependent Judiciary: Explaining Judicial Independence.” Southern California Law Review 72 (January/March): 353– 84.Google Scholar
Field Stephen J. 1890. “The Centenary of the Supreme Court of the United States.” American Law Review 24 (May–June): 351– 68.Google Scholar
Fiorina Morris P. 1986. “Legislator Uncertainty, Legislative Control, and the Delegation of Legislative Power.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 2 (Spring): 33– 51.Google Scholar
Fleming Roscoe. 1959. “America's Rotten Boroughs.” Nation, 10 January, 26– 27.Google Scholar
Frymer Paul. 1999. Uneasy Alliances: Race and Party Competition in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Frymer Paul. 2003. “Acting When Elected Officials Won't: Federal Courts and Civil Rights Enforcement in U.S. Labor Unions, 1935–85.” American Political Science Review 97 (August): 483– 99.Google Scholar
Gates John B. 1987. “Partisan Realignment, Unconstitutional State Polities, and the U.S. Supreme Court: 1837–1964.” American Journal of Political Science 31 (May): 259– 80.Google Scholar
Gates John B. 1992. The Supreme Court and Partisan Realignment: A Macro- and Microlevel Perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Gibbons v. Ogden. 1824. 22 U.S. 1.
Gillman Howard. 2002. “How Parties Can Use the Courts to Advance Their Agendas: Federal Courts in the United States, 1875–91.” American Political Science Review 96 (September): 511– 24.Google Scholar
Gillon Steven M. 1987. Politics and Vision: The ADA and American Liberalism, 1947–85. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ginsburg Tom. 2003. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Graber Mark A. 1993. “The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary.” Studies in American Political Development 7 (Spring): 35– 73.Google Scholar
Graber Mark A. 1998. “Federalist or Friends of Adams: The Marshall Court and Party Politics.” Studies in American Political Development 12 (October): 229– 66.Google Scholar
Graber Mark A. 2000. “The Jacksonian Origins of Chase Court Activism.” Journal of Supreme Court History 25 (March): 17– 39.Google Scholar
Hamilton Alexander. 1961. “Federalist No. 78.” In The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, ed. Clinton Rossiter. New York: New American Library.
Hansen John Mark. 1991. Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919–81. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hendrickson David C. 2003. Peace Pact: The Lost World of the American Founding. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Hirschl Ran. 2004. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and the Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
James Scott C. 2000. Presidents, Parties, and the State: A Party-System Perspective on Democratic Regulatory Choice, 1884–1936. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Johnsen Dawn E. 2003. “Ronald Reagan and the Rehnquist Court on Congressional Power: Presidential Influences on Constitutional Change.” Indiana Law Journal 78 (Winter/Spring): 363– 412.Google Scholar
Keck Thomas M. 2004. The Most Activist Supreme Court in History: The Road to Modern Judicial Conservatism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kennedy John F. 1958. “The Shame of the States.” New York Times Magazine, 18 May, 12, 37– 40.Google Scholar
Kennedy John F. 1963. Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: John F. Kennedy, 1962. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Kennedy John F. 1964. Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: John F. Kennedy, 1963. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Kennedy John Pendleton. 1850. Memoirs of the Life of William Wirt, Attorney-General of the United States, New and Revised Edition. 2 vols. Philadelphia: Lea and Blanchard.
Kiewiet D. Roderick, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Klarman Michael J. 1996. “Rethinking the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Revolutions.” Virginia Law Review 82 (February): 1– 67.Google Scholar
Klarman Michael J. 1997. “Majoritarian Judicial Review: The Entrenchment Problem.” Georgetown Law Journal 85 (February): 491– 553.Google Scholar
Knapp Fred. 1997. “Exon Laments Porn Ruling Internet.” Lincoln Journal Star, 27 June, A1.Google Scholar
Krehbiel Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Kutler Stanley I. 1968. Judicial Power and Reconstruction Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Landes William, and Richard Posner. 1975. “The Independent Judiciary in an Interest-Group Perspective.” Journal of Law and Economics 18 (December): 875– 911.Google Scholar
Lewis Anthony. 1958. “Legislative Apportionment and the Federal Courts.” Harvard Law Review 71 (April): 1057– 98.Google Scholar
Lindsay John J. 1962. “The Underprivileged Majority.” Nation, 10 March, 208– 10.Google Scholar
Lovell George I. 2003. Legislative Deferrals Statutory Ambiguity, Judicial Power, and American Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Madison James. 1910. The Writings of James Madison, ed. Gaillard Hunt. Vol. 9. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons.
Madison James. 1961. “Federalist No. 39.” In The Federalist Papers, by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, ed. Clinton Rossiter. New York: New American Library.
Marshall Burke. 1964. Federalism and Civil Rights. New York: Columbia University Press.
Martin John Barlow. 1977. Adlai Stevenson and the World: The Life of Adlai E. Stevenson. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Martin John Frederick. 1979. Civil Rights and the Crisis of Liberalism: The Democratic Party, 1945–1976. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Matusow Allen J. 1984. The Unraveling of America: A History of Liberalism in the 1960s. New York: Harper and Row.
Maxfield Sylvia. 1997. Gatekeepers of Growth: The International Political Economy of Central Banking in Developing Countries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission. 2003. 540 U.S. 93.Google Scholar
McCubbins Mathew D., and Thomas Schwartz. 1984. “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms.” American Journal of Political Science 28 (February): 165– 79.Google Scholar
McMahon Kevin J. 2003. Reconsidering Roosevelt on Race: How the Presidency Paved the Road to Brown. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Melnick R. Shep. 1994. Between the Lines: Interpreting Welfare Rights. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Moravcsik Andrew. 2000. “The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe.” International Organization 54 (Spring): 217– 52.Google Scholar
Moustafa Tamir. 2003. “The Judicialization of Politics in Egypt.” Law and Social Inquiry 28 (Fall): 883– 930.Google Scholar
Nagel Stuart S. 1965. “Court-Curbing Periods in American History.” Vanderbilt Law Review 18 (June): 925– 44.Google Scholar
Neuberger Richard L. 1941. “Our Gerrymandered States.” Nation, 1 February, 127– 28.Google Scholar
Pickerill J. Mitchell. 2004. Constitutional Deliberation in Congress: The Impact of Judicial Review in a Separated System. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Pickerill J. Mitchell, and Cornell W. Clayton. 2004. “The Rehnquist Court and the Political Dynamics of Federalism.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (June): 233– 48.Google Scholar
Pollack v. Farmers' Loan and Trust. 1895a. 157 U.S. 429.Google Scholar
Pollack v. Farmers' Loan and Trust. 1895b. 158 U.S. 601.Google Scholar
Powe Lucas A., Jr. 2000. The Warren Court and American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Powers Fred Perry. 1890. “Recent Centralizing Tendencies in the Supreme Court.” Political Science Quarterly 5 (September): 389– 410.Google Scholar
Rakove Jack N. 1996. Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution. New York: Vintage Press.
Ramseyer J. Mark. 1994. “The Puzzling (In)dependence of Courts: A Comparative Approach.” Journal of Legal Studies 23 (June): 721– 47.Google Scholar
Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union. 1997. 521 U.S. 844.Google Scholar
Reston James. 1952. “Governor Says ‘No.’” New York Times, 31 March, 1.Google Scholar
Reynolds v. Sims. 1964. 377 U.S. 533.
Richardson James D. 1908. A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents, 1789–1907. 11 vols. New York: Bureau of National Literature and Art.
Rogers James R. 2001. “Information and Judicial Review: A Signaling Game of Legislative-Executive Interaction.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (January): 84– 99.Google Scholar
Rosenberg Gerald N. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rosenberg Gerald N. 1992. “Judicial Independence and the Reality of Political Power.” Review of Politics 54 (Summer): 369– 98.Google Scholar
Rowe James, Jr. 1995. “The Politics of 1948.” In Documentary History of the Truman Administration, edited by Dennis K. Merrill. Vol. 14. Bethesda, MD: University Publications of America.
Schattschneider E.E. 1975. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.
Schwartz Bernard. 1983. Super Chief: Earl Warren and His Supreme Court—A Judicial Biography. New York: New York University Press.
Schwartz John. 1996. “Language on ‘Indecency’ Sparks Telecommunications Bill Protest.” Washington Post, 5 February, A8.Google Scholar
Shapiro Martin. 1999. “The Success of Judicial Review.” In Constitutional Dialogues in Comparative Perspective, ed. Sally J. Kenney, William M. Reisinger, and John C. Reitz. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Skowronek Stephen. 1993. The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to George Bush. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sowell Randy L. 1992. “Judicial Vigor: The Warren Court and the Kennedy Administration.” Ph.D. diss. University of Kansas.
Special to The New York Times. 1954. “Tennessee Race is Growing Heated.” The New York Times, 25 July, 60.
Special to The New York Times. 1960. “U.S. Asks High Court Review of Tennessee Apportionment.” The New York Times, 20 April, 25.
Special to The New York Times. 1962. “Capital is Split on Apportioning.” The New York Times, 28 March, 1.
Spriggs James F., II, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 1995. “Calling It Quits: Strategic Retirement on the Federal Courts of Appeal, 1893–1991.” Political Research Quarterly 48 (September): 573– 97.Google Scholar
Stephenson Donald Grier, Jr. 1999. Campaigns and the Court: The U.S. Supreme Court in Presidential Elections. New York: Columbia University Press.
Stimson James A., Michael B. Mackuen, and Robert S. Erikson. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review 89 (September): 543– 65.Google Scholar
Summers Festus P. 1953. William L. Wilson and Tariff Reform: A Biography. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Sundquist James L. 1983. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States, Revised Edition. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
1894. The New York Times. “Mr. Cockran's Final Effort,” 31 January, 6.
1895a. The New York Times. “Psychology of the Supreme Court,” 2 May, 4.
1895b. The New York Times. “Democratic Doctrine Destroys the Populist Income Tax,” 21 May, 4.
1896. The New York Times. “Clevelandism Again,” 21 November, 4.
Omaha World Herald. 1997. “Exon's Decency Act a Good Try, But Sleaze Difficult to Fight,” 29 June, 12b.
Tiedeman Christopher G. 1886. A Treatise on the Limitations of Police Powers in the United States. St. Louis: F.H. Thomas Law Book Co.
Truman Harry S. 1964. Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: 1948. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Truman Harry S. 1968. Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: 1952–1953. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Tushnet Mark. Forthcoming. “The Supreme Court and the National Political Order: Collaboration and Confrontation.” In The Supreme Court in American Political Development, ed. Ronald Kahn and Ken I. Kersch. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Vanberg Georg. 2001. “Legislative-Judicial Relations: A Game Theoretic Approach to Constitutional Review.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (April): 346– 61.Google Scholar
Voigt Stefan, and Eli M. Salzberger. 2002. “Choosing Not to Choose: When Politicians Choose to Delegate Powers.” Kyklos 55 (2): 289– 310.Google Scholar
Warren Charles. 1926. The Supreme Court in United States History. 2 vols. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
Warren Earl. 1977. The Memoirs of Earl Warren. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Weaver R. Kent. 1986. “The Politics of Blame Avoidance.” Journal of Public Policy 6 (4): 371– 98.Google Scholar
Weingast Barry R. 1997. “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law.” American Political Science Review 91 (June): 245– 63.Google Scholar
Welsh Orville. 1932. “The Democratic Revolution.” Nation, 30 November, 523– 24.Google Scholar
Weisberg Jacob. 1996. “Strange Webfellows.” Slate, 14 December (http://slate.msn.com/id/2257).Google Scholar
White Walter. 1948. A Man Called White: The Autobiography of Walter White. New York: Viking.
Whittington Keith E. 2001a. “The Road Not Taken: Dred Scott, Judicial Authority, and Political Questions.” Journal of Politics 63 (May): 365– 91.Google Scholar
Whittington Keith E. 2001b. “Presidential Challenges to Judicial Supremacy and the Politics of Constitutional Meaning.” Polity 33 (Spring): 365– 95.Google Scholar
Whittington Keith E. 2001c. “Taking What They Give Us: Explaining the Court's Federalism Offensive.” Duke Law Journal 51 (October): 477– 520.Google Scholar
Whittington Keith E. 2003. “Legislative Sanctions and the Strategic Environment of Judicial Review.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 1 (July): 446– 74.Google Scholar
Whittington Keith E., and Daniel P. Carpenter. 2003. “Executive Power in American Institutional Development.” Perspectives on Politics 1 (September): 495– 513.Google Scholar
Whittington Keith E. Forthcoming. “Preserving the ‘Dignity and Influence of the Court’: Political Supports for Judicial Review in the United States.” In The Art of the State: Rethinking Political Institutions, ed. Ian Shapiro and Stephen Skowronek. New York: New York University Press.
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.