Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:12:20.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Power and Social Exchange*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

David A. Baldwin
David A. Baldwin*
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the basic social science concepts of “power” and “social exchange” in order to determine the possibility and desirability of integrating them. It is argued that: (1) all exchange relationships can be described in terms of conventional power concepts without twisting the common-sense notions that underlie such concepts; (2) most–but not necessarily all–power relationships can be described in terms of exchange terminology; (3) there are some advantages to conceiving of power in this way; (4) recent social exchange theorists have neither illuminated nor recognized most of these advantages. After a preliminary examination of the concepts of “power” and “exchange,” the discussion focuses on the analytical and conceptual problems associated with volition, exchange media, asymmetry, sanctions, and authority.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 72 , Issue 4 , December 1978 , pp. 1229 - 1242
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An earlier version of this article was presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., September, 1977. The author would like to thank the following colleagues who provided helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper: Harry Eckstein, Henry Ehrmann, Raymond Hall, David Kipnis, Roger Masters, Felix Oppenheim, Melvin Snyder, and Denis Sullivan.

References

Ardrey, Robert (1966). The Territorial Imperative. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Baldwin, David A. (1971a). “Money and Power.” Journal of Politics 33:578–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, David A. (1971b). “The Power of Positive Sanctions.” World Politics 24:19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, David A. (1971c). “The Costs of Power.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 15:145–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, David A. (1971d). “Inter-Nation Influence Revisited.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 15:471–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, Peter M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. (1963). “Towards a Pure Theory of Threat Systems.” American Economic Review 53:424–34.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. (1965). “The Economics of Human Conflict.” In McNeil, Elton B. (ed.), The Nature of Human Conflict. Englewood Cuffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, pp. 172–91.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Dorwin (1965). “Influence, Leadership, Control.” In March, James (ed.), Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally, pp. 1–47.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Dorwin, ed. (1959). Studies in Social Power. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Institute for Group Dynamics.Google Scholar
Catlin, George E. G. (1927). The Science and Method of Politics. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Catlin, George E. G. (1930). A Study of the Principles of Politics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chadwick-Jones, J. K. (1976). Social Exchange Theory: Its Structure and Influence in Social Psychology. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Curry, Robert L., and Wade, Larry L. (1968). A Theory of Political Exchange: Economic Reasoning in Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1957). “The Concept of Power.” Behavioral Science 2:201–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1976). Modern Political Analysis, 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1968). “Power.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 12. New York: Free Press, pp. 405–15.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. and Lindblom, Charles E. (1953). Politics, Economics, and Welfare. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Dahlström, Edmund (1966). “Exchange, Influence and Power.” Acta Sociologica 9:237–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahrendorf, Ralf (1958). “Out of Utopia: Toward a Reorientation of Sociological Analysis.” The American Journal of Sociology 64:115–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, Karl W. (1963). The Nerves of Government. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry (1973). “Authority Patterns: A Structural Basis for Political Inquiry.” American Political Science Review 67:1142–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, John C. (1962). “Measurement of Social Power, Opportunity Costs, and the Theory of Two-person Bargaining Games.” Behavioral Science 7:67–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harsanyi, John C. (1969). “Rational Choice Models of Political Behavior vs. Functionalist and Conformist Theories.” World Politics 21:513–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homans, George C. (1964). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms, rev. ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Ilchman, Warren F. (1971). Comparative Public Administration and “Conventional Wisdom.” Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Ilchman, Warren F. and Uphoff, Norman T. (1969). The Political Economy of Change. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter (1974). “Conflict, Power and Relative Deprivation.” American Political Science Review 68:1569–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasswell, Harold D., and Kaplan, Abraham (1950). Power and Society. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Konrad (1966). On Aggression. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
March, James G. (1955). “An Introduction to the Theory and Measurement of Influence.” American Political Science Review 49:431–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G. (1966). “The Power of Power.” In Easton, David (ed.), Varieties of Political Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, pp. 39–70.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger D. (forthcoming). “Of Marmots and Men: Human Altruism and Animal Behavior.” In Wispé, Lauren (ed.), Sympathy, Altruism and Helping. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Jack H. (1968). “Some Questions About the Concept of Power.” Behavioral Science 13:129–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagel, Jack H. (1975). The Descriptive Analysis of Power. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Felix E. (1961). Dimensions of Freedom. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheim, Felix E. (forthcoming). “‘Power’ Revisited.” Journal of Politics.Google Scholar
Palumbo, Dennis J. (1975). “Organization Theory and Political Science.” In Greenstein, Fred and Polsby, Nelson (ed.), Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 2. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, pp. 319–69.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott (1963). “On the Concept of Political Power.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 107:232–62.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott and Smelser, Neil J. (1956). Economy and Society: A Study of the Integration of Economic and Social Theory. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. (1957). Models of Man. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Thibaut, John W., and Kelley, Harold H. (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Waldman, Sidney R. (1972). Foundations of Political Action: An Exchange Theory of Politics. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1947; first published 1922). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Translated by Henderson, A. M. and Parsons, Talcott; edited by Parsons, Talcott. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
White, Ralph K. (1970). Nobody Wanted War: Misperception in Vietnam and Other Wars. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Wrong, Dennis H. (1968). “Some Problems in Defining Social Power.” American Journal of Sociology 73:673–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.