Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-24T23:31:50.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Presidential Influence in an Era of Congressional Dominance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2016

JON C. ROGOWSKI
JON C. ROGOWSKI*
Affiliation:
Washington University in St. Louis
*
Jon C. Rogowski is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Campus Box 1063, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130 (jrogowski@wustl.edu).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research on presidential power focuses almost exclusively on the modern era, while earlier presidents are said to have held office while congressional dominance was at its peak. In this article, I argue that nineteenth-century presidents wielded greater influence than commonly recognized due to their position as head of the executive branch. Using an original dataset on the county-level distribution of U.S. post offices from 1876 to 1896, I find consistent evidence that counties represented by a president’s copartisans in the U.S. House received substantially more post offices than other counties, and that these advantages were especially large under divided government and in electorally important states. These results are robust across model specifications and when examining the Senate. The findings challenge key components of the congressional dominance and modern presidency theses, and have important implications for scholarship on interbranch relations, bureaucratic politics, and American political development.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 110 , Issue 2 , May 2016 , pp. 325 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adler, William D. 2013. “Generalissimo of the Nation”: War Making and the Presidency in the Early Republic.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 43 (2): 412–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alger, Russell Alexander. 1901. The Spanish American War. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Bailey, Jeremy D. 2007. Thomas Jefferson and Executive Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Christopher R., Burden, Barry, and Howell, William G.. 2010. “The President and the Distribution of Federal Spending.” American Political Science Review 104 (4): 783–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Cameron. 2014. “The Post Office Window.” Stanford University Typescript.Google Scholar
Bryce, James. 1995 (1888). The American Commonwealth. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P. 2000. “State Building through Reputation Building: Policy Innovation and Coalitions of Esteem at the Post Office, 1883–1912.” Studies in American Political Development 14 (2): 121–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Networks, Reputations and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Christenson, Dino, Kriner, Douglas L., and Reeves, Andrew. 2014. “Presidential Politics and the Influence of Federal Spending on Senate Elections.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, August 28–31.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey. 1982. “The Impact of the Modern Presidency on Presidential Success in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 7 (4): 515–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey E. 2012. The President’s Legislative Policy Agenda, 1789–2002. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushing, Marshall. 1893. The Story of Our Post Office: The Greatest Government Department in All Its Phases. Boston: A.M. Thayer and Company.Google Scholar
Deering, Christopher J., and Smith, Steven S.. 1997. Committees in Congress. Washington, DC: CQ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Santis, Vincent. 1963. “American Politics in the Gilded Age.” The Review of Politics 25 (4): 551–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dynes, Adam, and Huber, Gregory A.. 2015. “Partisanship and the Allocation of Federal Spending: Do Same-Party Legislators or Voters Benefit from Shared Party Affiliation?” American Political Science Review 109 (1): 172–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Richard J., and Walker, Alexis. 2007. “Policy Speech in the Nineteenth Century Rhetorical Presidency: The Case of Zachary Taylor’s 1849 Tour.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 37 (2): 248–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John A. 1974. Pork Barrel Politics: Rivers and Harbors Legislation, 1947–1968. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, Dorothy G. 1945. “Congressional Dictation of Local Appointments.” Journal of Politics 7 (1): 25–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Wayne E. 2003. Morality and the Mail in Nineteenth-Century America. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Gailmard, Sean, and Patty, John W.. 2012. Learning While Governing: Expertise and Accountability in the Executive Branch. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Galvin, Daniel J. 2014. “Presidents as Agents of Change.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 44 (1): 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galvin, Daniel J., and Shogan, Colleen. 2004. “Presidential Politicization and Centralization Across the Modern-Traditional Divide.” Polity 36 (3): 477–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenstein, Fred I. 1982. The Hidden-Hand Presidency: Eisenhower as Leader. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Howell, William G., Jackman, Saul P., and Rogowski, Jon C.. 2013. The Wartime President. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Scott C. 2000. Presidents, Parties, and the State: A Party System Perspective on Democratic Regulatory Choice, 1884–1936. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Scott C. 2005. The Evolution of the Presidency: Between the Promise and the Fear. In Institutions of American Democracy: The Executive Branch, eds. Aberbach, Joel D. and Peterson, Mark A.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
James, Scott C. 2006. “Patronage Regimes and American Party Development from ‘The Age of Jackson’ to the Progressive Era.” British Journal of Political Science 36 (1): 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, Richard R. 1995. Spreading the News: The American Postal System from Franklin to Morse. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katznelson, Ira, and Lapinski, John S.. 2006. “At the Crossroads: Congress and American Political Development.” Perspectives on Politics 4 (2): 243–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Morton. 1977. Affairs of State: Public Life in Late Nineteenth-Century America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kernell, Samuel, and McDonald, Michael P.. 1999. “Congress and America’s Political Development: The Transformation of the Post Office from Patronage to Service.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 792–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinghard, Daniel P. 2005. “Grover Cleveland, William McKinley, and the Emergence of the President as Party Leader.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 35 (4): 736–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinghard, Daniel P. 2010. The Nationalization of American Political Parties, 1880–1896. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korzi, Michael J. 2004. A Seat of Popular Leadership: The Presidency, Political Parties, and Democratic Government. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Kriner, Douglas L., and Reeves, Andrew. 2015. “Presidential Particularism and Divide-the-Dollar Politics.” American Political Science Review 109 (1): 155–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapinski, John S. 2008. “Policy Substance and Performance in American Lawmaking, 1877–1994.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (2): 235–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laracey, Mel. 2002. Presidents and the People: The Partisan Story of Going Public. College Station, TX: Texas A & M University Press.Google Scholar
Letters and Messages of Rutherford B. Hayes, President of the United States . 1881. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Levitt, Steven D., and Snyder, James M. Jr. 1995. “Political Parties and the Distribution of Federal Outlays.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 958–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1972. “Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice.” Public Administration Review 32 (4): 298–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1986. The Personal President: Power Invested, Promise Unfulfilled. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mashaw, Jerry L. 2010. “Federal Administration and Administrative Law in the Gilded Age.” Yale Law Journal 119 (7): 1362–472.Google Scholar
Mayo, Laurence, ed. 1923. America of Yesterday as Reflected in the Journal of John Davis Long. Boston: The Atlantic Monthly Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan M. 2000. “Presidential Pork: Executive Veto Power and Distributive Politics.” American Political Science Review 84 (1): 117–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mebane, Walter R., and Wawro, Gregory J.. 2002. “Presidential Pork Barrel Politics.” Cornell University.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry. 1985. “The Politicized Presidency.” In The New Direction in American Politics, ed. Chubb, John and Peterson, Paul G.. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 1987. “An Assessment of the Positive Theory of ‘Congressional Dominance’.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 12 (4): 475–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, Terry, and Howell, William. 1999. “The Presidential Power of Unilateral Action.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15 (1): 132–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neustadt, Richard E. 1990. Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents: The Politics of Leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Parker, George F. 1909. Recollections of Grover Cleveland. New York: The Century Company.Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. 1968. “The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 62 (1): 144–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. 1983. Consequences of Party Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rogowski, Jon C. 2015. “Presidential Incentives, Bureaucratic Control, and Party Building in the Republican Era.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 45 (4): 796–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1987. “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.” American Political Science Review 81 (1): 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1993. “America’s First Social Security System: The Expansion of Benefits for Civil War Veterans.” Political Science Quarterly 108 (1): 85–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 1982. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 1992. “Franklin Roosevelt and the Modern Presidency.” Studies in American Political Development 6 (2): 322–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 1993. The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to George Bush. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 2002. “Presidency and American Political Development: A Third Look.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 32 (4): 743–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Robert M., and Bickers, Kenneth N.. 1995. Perpetuating the Pork Barrel: Policy Subsystems and American Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Charles H. 1989. Budget Reform Politics: The Design of the Appropriations Process. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, William A. 1899. Ohio In Congress From 1803 To 1901. Columbus, OH: The 20th Century Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Wawro, Gregory J., and Katznelson, Ira. 2014. “Designing Historical Social Scientific Inquiry: How Parameter Heterogeneity Can Bridge the Methodological Divide between Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (2): 526–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. 1979. “A Rational Choice Perspective on Congressional Norms.” American Journal of Political Science 23 (2): 245–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Leonard D. 1958. The Republican Era: 1869–1901. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E., and Carpenter, Daniel P.. 2003. “Executive Power in American Institutional Development.” Perspectives on Politics 1 (3): 495–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Rick K. 1986. “An Empirical Test of Preferences for the Political Pork Barrel: District Level Appropriations for River and Harbor Legislation, 1889–1913.” American Journal of Political Science 30 (4): 729–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. 1885. Congressional Government: A Study in American Politics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. 1908. Constitutional Government in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Christopher J. 2011. “Connecting the President and the People: Washington’s Neutrality, Genet’s Challenge, and Hamilton’s Fight for Public Support.” Journal of the Early Republic 31 (3): 435–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Rogowski supplementary material

Tables A.1-A.7

Download Rogowski supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 339.7 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.