Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Carpenter, Daniel
and
Ting, Michael M.
2005.
The political logic of regulatory error.
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 10,
p.
819.
Kim, Junseok
and
Gerber, Brian
2005.
Bureaucratic Leverage over Policy Choice: Explaining the Dynamics of State‐Level Reforms in Telecommunications Regulation.
Policy Studies Journal,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 4,
p.
613.
Gehlbach, Scott
2005.
The Consequences of Collective Action: An Incomplete-Contracts Approach.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Cook, Daniel M.
and
Bero, Lisa A.
2006.
Identifying Carcinogens: The Tobacco Industry and Regulatory Politics in the United States.
International Journal of Health Services,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 4,
p.
747.
Gehlbach, Scott
2006.
The Consequences of Collective Action: An Incomplete‐Contracts Approach.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 3,
p.
802.
Yackee, Jason Webb
and
Yackee, Susan Webb
2006.
A Bias Towards Business? Assessing Interest Group Influence on the U.S. Bureaucracy.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 68,
Issue. 1,
p.
128.
Carpenter, Daniel
and
Ting, Michael M.
2007.
Regulatory Errors with Endogenous Agendas.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 51,
Issue. 4,
p.
835.
Carpenter, Daniel
and
Sin, Gisela
2007.
Policy Tragedy and the Emergence of Regulation: The Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938.
Studies in American Political Development,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 2,
p.
149.
Gordon, Sanford C.
and
Hafer, Catherine
2007.
Corporate Influence and the Regulatory Mandate.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 69,
Issue. 2,
p.
300.
VOLDEN, CRAIG
TING, MICHAEL M.
and
CARPENTER, DANIEL P.
2008.
A Formal Model of Learning and Policy Diffusion.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 102,
Issue. 3,
p.
319.
Warren, Patrick L.
2008.
Allies and Adversaries: The Roles of Appointees in Administrative Policymaking under Separation of Powers.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Colares, Juscelino F.
2008.
An Empirical Examination of Product and Litigant-Specific Theories for the Divergence between NAFTA Chapter 19 and U.S. Judicial Review.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
GILAD, SHARON
2008.
EXCHANGE WITHOUT CAPTURE: THE UK FINANCIAL OMBUDSMAN SERVICE’S STRUGGLE FOR ACCEPTED DOMAIN.
Public Administration,
Vol. 86,
Issue. 4,
p.
907.
Eom, Jiyong
and
Sweeney, James L.
2009.
A Theory of Interest Group Proposals in Agency Rulemaking.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Carrell, Scott E.
and
Hauge, Janice A.
2009.
Politics and the implementation of public policy: The case of the US military housing allowance program.
Public Choice,
Vol. 138,
Issue. 3-4,
p.
367.
FLINDERS, MATTHEW
2009.
REVIEW ARTICLE: THEORY AND METHOD IN THE STUDY OF DELEGATION: THREE DOMINANT TRADITIONS.
Public Administration,
Vol. 87,
Issue. 4,
p.
955.
ZIBLATT, DANIEL
2009.
Shaping Democratic Practice and the Causes of Electoral Fraud: The Case
of Nineteenth-Century Germany.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 103,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Carpenter, Daniel
2009.
Government and Markets.
p.
164.
Carpenter, Daniel
2010.
Institutional Strangulation: Bureaucratic Politics and Financial Reform in the Obama Administration.
Perspectives on Politics,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 3,
p.
825.
Carpenter, D.
Moffitt, S. I.
Moore, C. D.
Rynbrandt, R. T.
Ting, M. M.
Yohai, I.
and
Zucker, E. J.
2010.
Early Entrant Protection in Approval Regulation: Theory and Evidence from FDA Drug Review.
Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 3,
p.
515.
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.