Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T00:44:44.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Richard Rorty, Liberalism and the Politics of Redescription

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Keith Topper
Keith Topper
Affiliation:
California State University, Long Beach
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent years Richard Rorty has sought to develop an alternative to the familiar rationalist and natural rights “vocabularies” of liberalism. Unlike most critics of classical liberalism, however, Rorty eschews attempts to argue against these vocabularies, and instead seeks to persuade his readers by redescribing the aspirations of a liberal society in a more “attractive” way. I assess Rorty's redescriptive practice through an analysis of his ideal liberal polity. I contend that although Rorty defends redescription as an alternative to “normal” philosophical and theoretical argument, his redescriptive efforts fail on their own terms: not only does it appear that there is no redescription in his descriptions, but he proves incapable of offering any insights into or exits from pressing problems in contemporary liberal societies. This, I submit, can be traced back to his unwillingness to investigate and redescribe power and power relations.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 89 , Issue 4 , December 1995 , pp. 954 - 965
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barber, Benjamin. 1992. An Aristocraat of Everyone: The Politics of Education and the Future of America. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy. 1989. Reclaiming Reality. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1988. Homo Academicus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bouveresse, Jacques. 1992. “Sur quelques conséquences indésirables du pragmatisme.” In Lire Rorty, ed. Cometti, Jean-Pierre. Combas: Editions de l'Éclat.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert, and Hall, Harrison. 1992. Introduction to Heidegger: A Critical Reader, ed. Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Hall, Harrison. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy. 1987. Democratic Education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
King, Jeff. 1990. ‘Ontology, Reflexivity, and Policy: Toward a Post-Cartesian Politics.” Presented at the annual meeting of the New York State Political Science Association, Albany.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1991. Liberalism, Community, and Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCumber, John. 1990. “Reconnecting Rorty: The Situation of Discourse in Richard Rorty's Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity.” Diacritics 20:2–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Parker, Rozsika, and Pollock, Griselda. 1981. Old Mistresses. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1987. Introduction to Feminist Challenges, ed. Pateman, Carole and Gross, Elizabeth. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1989. The Disorder of Women. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1983. Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis; University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1986a. “The Contingency of Selfhood.” London Review of Books, 8 May, pp. 11–14.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1986b. “The Contingency of Community.” London Review of Books, 24 July, pp. 10–14.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1987. “Posties.” London Review of Books, 3 September, pp. 11–12.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1989a. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1989b. “Education, Socialization, and Individuation.” Liberal Education 75:2–9.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1990a. “Diary.” London Review of Books, 8 February, p. 21.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1990b. “Truth and Freedom: A Reply to Thomas McCarthy.” Critical Inquiry 16:633–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1991a. Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1991b. Essays on Heidegger and Others: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1992. “Heidegger, Contingency, and Pragmatism.” In Heidegger: A Critical Reader, ed. Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Hall, Harrison. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. 1984. Ordinary Vices. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. 1989. “The Liberalism of Fear.” In Liberalism and the Moral Life, ed. Rosenbloom, Nancy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1992. “The Politics of Recognition.” In Multiculturalism and “The Politics of Recognition,” ed. Gutmann, Amy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Topper, Keith. 1994. Sciences of Uncertainty: Perspectives on Naturalism, Politics, and Power. Ph.D. diss. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
West, Cornel. 1993a. Keeping Faith. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
West, Cornel. 1993b. Prophetic Thought in Postmodern Times. Monroe, ME: Common Courage.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.